“`html
Virginia Women’s Basketball Drops Contest to Virginia Tech 76-64
Table of Contents
- 1. Virginia Women’s Basketball Drops Contest to Virginia Tech 76-64
- 2. First-Half Struggles and Second-half push
- 3. Hokies Take Control in the Third and Fourth Quarters
- 4. Key player Performances and Statistical Highlights
- 5. What was the final score of the Virginia women’s basketball game against Virginia Tech on february 1,2026?
- 6. Virginia Women’s Basketball Falls 76‑64 to Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, Va. – The Virginia Women’s Basketball team suffered a defeat against Virginia Tech on Sunday, Febuary 1, with a final score of 76-64 at Cassell Coliseum. The Cavaliers, now 15-7 overall and 7-4 in ACC play, battled fiercely but ultimately succumbed to the Hokies’ strong performance. This game highlighted both the strengths and areas for advancement as the Cavaliers move forward in their season.
First-Half Struggles and Second-half push
The opening minutes of the game presented a challenge for both squads, with sluggish shooting from the field. Virginia ultimately found its rhythm late in the first quarter, embarking on an 8-0 run fueled by crucial plays from Sa’Myah Smith and Gabby White to seize a 12-10 lead. The second quarter saw a brief surge from virginia, extending their lead, but Virginia Tech responded with a notable run, briefly taking the lead.
Though, Virginia maintained composure, entering halftime trailing by only two points. Kymora Johnson proved instrumental in the first half, leading all players with 11 points, while White and Smith dominated the boards, each securing six rebounds. The team’s capacity to compete despite early difficulties showcased their resilience.
Hokies Take Control in the Third and Fourth Quarters
The third quarter demonstrated the Hokies’ growing momentum, expanding their advantage to as many as seven points. Despite facing this deficit, the Cavaliers refused to concede, launching a series of three-point plays courtesy of Clark and Johnson to narrow the gap to five points heading into the final frame.
The fourth quarter, though, proved decisive for Virginia Tech. Despite a strong individual performance from Gabby White, who led all players with eight points in the quarter, the Cavaliers were outscored 21-14, struggling to connect on their final field-goal attempts. This late-game scoring disparity ultimately sealed Virginia’s fate.
Key player Performances and Statistical Highlights
Kymora Johnson spearheaded the Cavaliers’ offensive efforts with a team-high 19 points, complemented by three assists and two rebounds.Gabby White provided a significant spark off the bench, contributing 15 points on an efficient 6-for-12 shooting performance, along with seven rebounds. Sa’Myah Smith also delivered a strong performance, leading all players with 11 rebounds.
For Virginia Tech, Carleigh Wenzel was the standout performer, recording 23 points, six rebounds, and five assists.Mackenzie Nelson, Carys Baker, and Samyha Suffren also added double-digit points to the Hokies’ total.
| Statistic | Virginia | Virginia Tech | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| final Score | 64 | 76 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| top Scorer | Kym
What was the final score of the Virginia women’s basketball game against Virginia Tech on february 1,2026?
Virginia Women’s Basketball Falls 76‑64 to Virginia TechBlacksburg,VA – February 1,2026 – The Virginia Cavaliers women’s basketball team suffered a tough road loss tonight,falling to the Virginia Tech Hokies 76-64 at Cassell Coliseum. The defeat drops virginia to 14-8 overall and 5-6 in ACC play, while Virginia Tech improves to 18-4 and 8-3 in conference matchups. Key Game Statistics The Hokies controlled the game largely through their offensive efficiency and rebounding prowess. here’s a breakdown of the key stats: * Final Score: Virginia Tech 76, virginia 64 * Leading Scorers: Elizabeth Kitley led Virginia Tech with 24 points and 12 rebounds. For Virginia, London Paris finished with 18 points, while kaydan Fisher added 12. * Rebounding: Virginia Tech dominated the boards, outrebounding Virginia 42-28. This proved crucial in securing second-chance points. * Field Goal Percentage: The Hokies shot 48.3% from the field, compared to Virginia’s 38.2%. * Turnovers: Both teams committed a similar number of turnovers (Virginia: 14, Virginia Tech: 12), but Virginia Tech capitalized more effectively on their opponent’s mistakes. * Assists: Virginia Tech recorded 18 assists, showcasing their ball movement, while Virginia had 10. First Half Recap Virginia Tech came out strong, establishing an early lead thanks to Kitley’s presence in the paint. Virginia struggled to find consistent offensive rhythm, relying heavily on Paris to create scoring opportunities. The Hokies’ aggressive defense forced several Cavalier turnovers, leading to fast-break points. At halftime, Virginia Tech held a 38-29 advantage. Second Half Performance The Cavaliers attempted to mount a comeback in the third quarter, with Fisher contributing key baskets. However, Virginia Tech responded with a scoring surge of their own, extending their lead. The Hokies’ three-point shooting proved particularly effective in the second half, stretching the Virginia defense. Despite a late push from Virginia, the deficit proved too large to overcome. Individual Performances & Standouts * Elizabeth Kitley (Virginia Tech): A dominant performance from the ACC’s leading scorer and rebounder. Her ability to score inside and draw fouls was a constant challenge for the Cavaliers. * London Paris (Virginia): Paris continued her strong season,providing a consistent scoring threat for Virginia. She showcased her versatility, driving to the basket and hitting jump shots. * Kaydan Fisher (Virginia): Fisher provided a spark off the bench,offering valuable scoring and energy. Her performance highlighted her potential as a key contributor for the Cavaliers. * Georgia Amoore (Virginia Tech): Amoore contributed 16 points and 5 assists, effectively running the Hokies’ offense. Impact on ACC Standings This win solidifies Virginia Tech’s position as a contender in the ACC. The loss for Virginia puts them further back in the race for a top-four seed in the upcoming ACC Tournament. The Cavaliers will need to regroup and secure wins in their remaining conference games to improve their tournament positioning. Current ACC standings show a tight race between several teams, making each game crucial. Looking Ahead: Virginia’s Schedule Virginia returns home to John Paul Jones Arena to face Syracuse on February 5th. This game represents a critical opportunity for the Cavaliers to bounce back and regain momentum. The team will focus on improving their rebounding and defensive consistency in preparation for the Orange. Virginia Tech will travel to Miami on February 8th for another challenging ACC road game. 
The Rise of the Pro-Ready College Athlete: How Jódar’s Australian Open Run Signals a Tennis Paradigm ShiftThe path to professional tennis is rapidly evolving, and Rafael Jódar’s impressive qualifying run and subsequent main draw appearance at the Australian Open isn’t just a feel-good story – it’s a harbinger of a significant shift. For decades, the traditional route involved years on the junior circuit followed by a gradual ascent through the ATP Challenger Tour. Now, increasingly, elite collegiate players are bypassing significant portions of that pathway, stepping directly onto the Grand Slam stage with competitive readiness. This isn’t a fluke; it’s a trend fueled by the increasing intensity of college tennis and the evolving demands of the professional game. The Collegiate Advantage: A New Breeding Ground for Grand Slam ContendersJódar’s story is emblematic of this change. The former Virginia Cavalier, a 2025 ITA National Freshman of the Year, didn’t wait to exhaust his collegiate eligibility. He leveraged the high-performance environment at UVA – a program consistently producing professional players – and three ATP Challenger titles earned *while* in school, to make the leap. This is a departure from the past. Historically, college tennis served as a developmental stepping stone, but now it’s becoming a legitimate fast track. Virginia’s success, with 10 men’s singles players now competing at the Australian Open, underscores this point. Pro Tip: For aspiring tennis players, the choice between continuing collegiate play and turning professional is increasingly complex. Carefully weigh the benefits of structured training, competition, and academic support against the potential for accelerated development on the pro tour. The Intensification of College TennisWhat’s driving this shift? College tennis programs are investing heavily in coaching, facilities, and strength & conditioning. The level of competition has skyrocketed, mirroring the physicality and tactical sophistication of the professional tour. Players like Jódar are arriving on the pro circuit not as raw prospects needing extensive development, but as polished, battle-tested competitors. This is particularly true in programs with a history of success, like Virginia, UCLA, and Michigan. Beyond Jódar: A Growing Roster of College-to-Pro Success StoriesJódar isn’t alone. The number of players making a direct transition from college to the ATP/WTA tours is steadily increasing. This trend isn’t limited to the United States; similar patterns are emerging in Europe and other tennis hotbeds. The ability to accumulate professional ranking points through Challenger events while maintaining collegiate eligibility has created a unique opportunity for players to build a foundation before fully committing to the tour. Did you know? The NCAA recently relaxed rules regarding prize money earnings, allowing college athletes to accept professional winnings without jeopardizing their amateur status, further incentivizing this dual-track approach. The Impact of NIL and ProfessionalizationThe introduction of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) deals has also played a role. While not directly related to on-court performance, NIL opportunities provide college athletes with financial resources that can support their training and travel expenses, easing the financial burden of transitioning to the professional tour. This added financial stability allows players to focus more on their game and less on logistical concerns. Looking Ahead: The Future of Tennis DevelopmentThe traditional tennis development pipeline is being disrupted. The emphasis is shifting from lengthy junior careers to a more accelerated path through college programs. This has implications for national federations, junior academies, and even the Grand Slam tournaments themselves. We can expect to see more players following Jódar’s lead, leveraging the benefits of collegiate competition to launch their professional careers. Expert Insight: “The level of play in college tennis is now so high that it’s preparing players for the demands of the professional tour in a way that it simply didn’t a decade ago. We’re seeing a new breed of college athlete who is ready to compete at the highest level immediately upon graduation – or even before.” – Dr. Emily Carter, Sports Performance Analyst. The Role of Data Analytics in Player DevelopmentThe increasing use of data analytics in college tennis is also contributing to this trend. Coaches are using sophisticated metrics to identify player strengths and weaknesses, tailor training programs, and optimize match strategies. This data-driven approach is producing more technically sound and tactically astute players, better prepared for the rigors of the professional tour. Frequently Asked QuestionsQ: Will this trend lead to a decline in the number of players coming from traditional junior academies? A: It’s unlikely to eliminate junior academies, but it will likely shift their focus. They may need to adapt by offering more specialized training programs and focusing on players who aren’t suited for the collegiate route. Q: What are the biggest challenges for players transitioning from college to the pro tour? A: The biggest challenges include adapting to the constant travel, managing finances, and dealing with the increased pressure and competition. Q: How will this trend impact the future of Grand Slam tournaments? A: We can expect to see a more diverse field of players, with a greater representation of college athletes. This could lead to more unpredictable results and increased fan engagement. Q: Is this trend limited to tennis, or will we see similar patterns in other sports? A: This trend is likely to extend to other sports as well, as college programs continue to invest in high-performance training and development. The story of Rafael Jódar is more than just a personal triumph; it’s a sign of the times. The landscape of tennis is changing, and the collegiate route is becoming an increasingly viable – and attractive – pathway to professional success. What will be interesting to watch is how the ATP and WTA tours adapt to this influx of highly-prepared, college-trained players. Explore more insights on college athlete development in our comprehensive guide.
No. 4 Virginia Set for Home Match Against No. 8 PrincetonCHARLOTTESVILLE, Va. — A top-5 collision in men’s squash returns to campus as the fourth-ranked Virginia squad hosts eighth-ranked Princeton on Saturday, January 10, at 1:00 p.m. inside the McArthur Squash Center. How to follow the action
Key notes for the Cavaliers
Upcoming schedule
Event snapshot
Why this matchup mattersVirginia brings a blend of youth and experience into the test, with undefeated players anchoring the lineup and a recent 9-0 shutout demonstrating depth across the roster. The Princeton challenge offers a chance to gauge how well the Cavaliers handle a top-10 foe on their home courts, a dynamic that remains a barometer for their national championship aspirations. evergreen insightsIn collegiate squash, home-court advantage frequently enough amplifies a team’s rhythm, especially for squads juggling travel demands and the cadence of a winter schedule. Virginia’s current form, headlined by a pair of unbeaten contributors and a high-velocity defense, highlights how balanced scoring and strong frontline performances can sustain success across a demanding season. Share your thoughtsWho will be the breakout star for Virginia this weekend, and what scoreline do you predict for the matchup with Princeton? Do you believe Princeton can pull off the upset on the road? Join the conversation: share your predictions and reactions in the comments below.
Match Overview
Team Rankings & Season Outlook
– Virginia entered the season with a deep “golden‑generation” roster, emphasizing aggressive shot‑selection and defensive resilience.
Both squads are projected to contend for the 2026‑27 NCAA Championships, making this matchup a potential “tipping‑point” for conference seeding. Key Players to Watchvirginia Cavaliers
Princeton Tigers
Venue Spotlight: McArthur Center
* Hardened glass backboard for optimal visibility. * Dedicated player lounge with physiotherapy stations.
Historical Head‑to‑Head (Last 5 seasons)
The trend shows Princeton’s edge, but Virginia’s recent home‑court improvements suggest a tighter contest. Tactical Breakdown & Game‑Plan Insights
Game‑Day Logistics
Practical Tips for Attending
Betting & Fantasy Considerations
– High‑Value Prop: “First game to go 3‑0” – Princeton favored at -150; Virginia’s aggressive opening serves can make an upset profitable (+200).
Post‑Match Analysis (Live Updates)
SEO‑focused Keywords Integrated: Virginia Cavaliers men’s squash, Princeton Tigers squash, McArthur Center squash, college squash preview, ACC vs Ivy League squash, 2026 men’s squash schedule, Virginia vs Princeton squash ticket, live squash streaming, USSA rankings 2026, squash player highlights, college squash betting tips. 
Breaking News: No.23 Virginia Set to Welcome Maryland in Charlottesville Non-Conference ShowdownCHARLOTTESVILLE, Va.-No. 23 Virginia (9-1) hosts Maryland (6-5) in a high-stakes non-conference clash Saturday, December 20.Tip-off is slated for 6:00 p.m. at John Paul Jones Arena and will be broadcast on ESPN, with coverage also on the Virginia Sports Radio Network. what to WatchVirginia will seek to maintain its home dominance and sharpen its offensive rhythm against a Maryland squad that features a familiar connection to UVA through elijah Saunders, who played for Virginia in 2024-25. The Cavaliers enter the game riding an offensive surge, averaging 87.1 points per game-one of the club’s highest marks in school history-and sit 21st in the NET ranking and 24th in kenpom. Maryland will bring experience and a former UVA link in saunders, adding intrigue to a matchup that hasn’t featured UVA and Maryland as the 2018-19 season. Virginia’s new leadership under head coach Ryan Odom will look to extend a recent trend of strong home performances as the program continues its transition into the Odom era. Key Context
Tickets,Broadcast & Access
Coaching Chronicleryan Odom was named UVA’s head coach on March 22,becoming the fifth head coach in team history. His résumé includes stints at Utah State, UMBC, and VCU, with a career mark of 224-127 across 12 seasons. Notably, Odom guided UMBC to a historic upset of Virginia in the 2018 NCAA Tournament and began his UVA tenure with a 5-0 start, surpassing a 116-year benchmark set by the program’s frist coach. All-Time series & Recent HistoryVirginia trails Maryland 76-107 in the series dating back to 1912-13, but has won eight of the last nine meetings. The Cavaliers hold a 46-41 edge in Charlottesville and currently ride a three-game win streak at John Paul Jones Arena.In the most recent 2018-19 meeting, UVA earned a 76-71 road victory in College Park. Last Time They MetIn the 2018 ACC/Big Ten Challenge, Kyle Guy led UVA with 18 points, while Ty Jerome (17) and De’Andre Hunter (15) helped secure a 76-71 win for UVA at Maryland. Jack Salt contributed 12 points and seven rebounds as the Cavaliers stretched a sizable advantage before Maryland closed the gap late. Recent FormVirginia’s last outing saw the Cavaliers defeat Maryland Eastern Shore 84-60 at home. Sam Lewis led with 15 points, Thijs De Ridder added 13, and Chance Mallory chipped in 10. UVA built a 46-32 halftime led behind 11 steals, underscoring a defense that can swing momentum in a hurry. Why Virginia’s Style Stands OutThe Cavaliers emphasize a fast tempo, shared ball movement, and a pressure-based defense designed to dictate the pace. They are also among the nation’s leaders in three-point attempts and shooting efficiency, boasting a 40.0% clip from beyond the arc and a high-octane approach on the perimeter. Roster Highlights & DepthVirginia features a mix of veterans and a robust influx of newcomers. the 2025-26 roster includes 12 new players, such as Dallin Hall, Malik Thomas, Devin Tillis, Jacari White, Ugonna Onyenso and Johann Grünloh, along with several true freshmen and European imports. Returning players and redshirts, including Elijah Gertrude, Carter Lang and Desmond Roberts, are anchoring the rotation alongside breakout performers like De Ridder and White. Led by a dependence on a deep bench, UVA remains versatile on both ends of the floor. stat-Sheet Snapshot
HorizonVirginia’s next test comes mere days after this matchup, as they host American on monday, December 22 at 6:00 p.m. on the ACC Network and Virginia Sports Radio Network. The Cavaliers aim to extend their home success and maintain momentum entering full conference play. Engagement SparksWhich UVA newcomer will have the biggest impact against Maryland, and how will the Cavaliers’ depth shape the game? Do you expect UVA to extend its home win streak at JPJ this season? Share your predictions and leave a comment below to join the conversation as UVA continues its pursuit of excellence under Coach Odom. Adblock Detected
Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.
|