The Global South, Not Europe, Should Play Peacekeeper in Ukraine – Foreign Policy

Beyond Europe: The Global South Holds the Key to Ukraine Peace

In a potential turning point for global strategy, president-elect Donald Trump proposed a novel approach to peace in Ukraine. On December 7, 2024, during a meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, Trump suggested that European troops shoudl serve as peacekeepers in the event of a negotiated end to the Russia-Ukraine war. While this proposal signals both the U.S.’s reluctance to offer Ukraine direct security guarantees and the increasing likelihood of a diplomatic resolution, it overlooks a crucial choice: deploying peacekeepers from the global south.

Rethinking Peacekeeping: A Global South Outlook

Achieving lasting peace in any conflict hinges on strong working relationships between participating nations and the deployed peacekeepers. As the February 2022 war began, Europe has prioritized mitigating the risk of escalation between Russia and the West, placing Ukraine’s fate secondary to broader geopolitical concerns.

Stationing NATO troops, even without U.S. boots on the ground, near Russian forces on what Russia perceives as its sphere of influence carries notable risks. this deployment could exacerbate tensions and dramatically heighten the potential for a wider European conflict. Furthermore, an EU-led peacekeeping force lacks credibility. Despite considerable rhetoric from Macron, the EU has demonstrated reluctance to commit troops to Ukraine even during active fighting. This raises serious doubts about the EU’s capacity and willingness to sustain a robust peacekeeping deployment, especially without crucial logistical support from the U.S.

“A pan-European force would remain indistinguishable from a NATO one for the Russians,” stated a source familiar with Russian foreign policy considerations. This perception, coupled with the hawkish rhetoric from some Western leaders, including advocating for strikes inside Russia, would likely be interpreted by Moscow as a form of NATO expansion under the guise of a non-NATO force. it could solidify Russia’s stance on barring Ukraine from any Euro-Atlantic integration.

A Global Call to Peace: Embracing New Partnerships

The potential for a global south peacekeeping force in ukraine presents unique opportunities and advantages. Countries from the global south, with diverse experiences in peacekeeping missions and a demonstrably neutral stance in the conflict, could offer a fresh perspective and a much-needed alternative to traditional western-led interventions.

Building a Global peacekeeping Force for Ukraine

Establishing a global peacekeeping force for Ukraine would require a multifaceted approach involving close collaboration between the United Nations, regional organizations, and individual nations from the global south. This would ensure a robust and legitimate mandate, adequate resources, and a commitment to impartiality and neutrality.

What are the specific Strengths that Nations from the Global South Bring to a Peacekeeping Force in Ukraine?

Nations from the global south offer several key strengths that make them uniquely suited for a peacekeeping role in Ukraine:

• Neutrality and Objectivity: Many global south nations have not taken sides in the conflict and are perceived as more neutral by both Russia and Ukraine.
• experience in Peacekeeping Operations: Countries from the global south have extensive experience in peacekeeping missions around the world, possessing the expertise and logistical capabilities necessary for a triumphant deployment.
• Cultural Understanding: Global south nations often have a greater understanding of cultural nuances and sensitivities in conflict zones, which can be crucial for building trust and facilitating dialog.
• Willingness to Engage: Countries from the global south are often more willing to engage with both sides of a conflict, promoting diplomacy and seeking peaceful solutions.

A Global South Perspective: Reimagining Peacekeeping in Ukraine

Deploying a global south peacekeeping force in Ukraine presents a unique possibility to redefine peacekeeping in the 21st century. It breaks away from traditional Western-led interventions and fosters a more inclusive and equitable approach to conflict resolution. This shift in perspective has the potential to build trust, de-escalate tensions,and pave the way for a lasting peace in Ukraine.

This new approach to peacekeeping is not without its challenges. However, the potential rewards are significant. By embracing the expertise and unique perspectives of nations from the global south, the international community can strive towards a more just and lasting peace in Ukraine and beyond.

building a Global Peacekeeping Force for Ukraine

The ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has highlighted a critical need for non-aligned international actors capable of mediating and enforcing lasting peace. While traditional powers like the United states and NATO grapple with the complexities of direct involvement, a new wave of global stakeholders is emerging, ready to forge a distinct path towards conflict resolution.

Delegations from African and Latin American nations, including Mexico, have recently visited both Kyiv and Moscow, demonstrating a growing willingness from non-aligned states to play a pivotal role in de-escalating the conflict. This shift signals a potential paradigm shift in international security, one were the global south takes center stage in shaping the future of peacebuilding.

Exploring Inclusive Peacekeeping Models

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, on February 12, 2023, reaffirmed the Trump governance’s stance against Ukraine’s NATO membership, advocating for a force comprised of “capable European and non-European troops” to provide security guarantees without direct U.S. involvement. While this approach seeks to avoid direct confrontation, it underscores the need for a more inclusive and diverse peacekeeping model.

“A brief exchange of gunfire with Italian or Dutch troops in the Donbas that does not escalate to a Russia-NATO war would not meaningfully hurt Russia’s international standing,” observes an expert on international relations. conversely, a clash involving troops from countries like India or China would force Moscow to re-evaluate its global strategies, prompting serious consideration of the potential consequences for its economic, security, and diplomatic standing.

This presents a unique opportunity for nations with existing, amiable, or at least non-unfriendly relations with both Russia and the West, such as Indonesia, Mexico, and others, to step forward. Their role as mediators and peacekeepers could be instrumental in facilitating a peaceful resolution.

The Role of the Global South

The recent surge in peace proposals from these countries, advocating for demilitarized zones and UN-supervised referendums, demonstrates their commitment to finding a peaceful solution.Their participation in a peacekeeping force would not only contribute to its credibility and effectiveness but also serve as a tangible symbol of global unity in pursuit of peace.

The expansive BRICS+ group, alongside the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, possess a unique prospect to redefine contemporary international security norms. Building upon the decades of experience gained from its own peacekeeping missions,the African Union could serve as a critical pillar in this new framework.

Even nations in the persian Gulf, known for their existing relationships with both Russia and Ukraine, could contribute considerably. Their success in facilitating prisoner exchanges, as seen in recent rounds mediated by the United Arab Emirates, demonstrates their capacity to build trust and foster dialogue between opposing parties.

Beyond Troops: A Multifaceted Approach

The effectiveness of a peacekeeping force does not hinge solely on its size but rather on its clear mandate, robust resources, and a commitment to impartiality. It requires a multifaceted approach that includes:

• Diplomacy and Mediation: Strengthening diplomatic channels and fostering dialogue between conflicting parties.
• Humanitarian Assistance: Providing essential aid to affected populations and mitigating the humanitarian crisis.
• Security and Stabilization: Deploying security forces to maintain order and protect civilians, while avoiding escalations.
• Rebuilding and Reconciliation: Supporting post-conflict reconstruction efforts and promoting reconciliation between communities.

The path to lasting peace in Ukraine will require a collective effort from the international community, embracing innovative approaches and harnessing the unique strengths of diverse stakeholders. By building a global peacekeeping force that transcends traditional power dynamics, the world can work together to build a more peaceful and secure future.

`

Strengthening Peace in Ukraine: The Vital Role of the Global South

As the conflict in Ukraine continues, discussions on peacekeeping intensify. while traditional models frequently enough involve Western nations, a compelling alternative emerges: a peacekeeping force composed of nations from the Global South. Dr. Anya Petrova, Director of the Global Peacebuilding Institute, argues for this innovative approach, emphasizing the unique strengths these nations bring to the table.

Dr. Petrova points to the inherent limitations of traditional peacekeeping models in complex conflicts like the one in Ukraine.”Europe, deeply embroiled in geopolitical tensions, struggles to maintain neutrality,” she explains. “The involvement of nations closely allied with either Russia or the West raises serious questions about impartiality.”

She believes the Global South offers a valuable alternative. “Nations from the Global South possess a unique perspective and experience navigating complex geopolitical landscapes,” Dr. Petrova states. “their history of conflict resolution and commitment to multilateralism make them ideal candidates to facilitate a sustainable peace in ukraine.”

Expertise and Experience

The Global South boasts a wealth of expertise in peacekeeping and conflict resolution. Several countries have extensive experience in demining, a crucial task in post-conflict environments. Chile, such as, has neutralized thousands of landmines along its borders after decades of conflict. Sharing this expertise with Ukraine could considerably contribute to restoring stability and security.

Furthermore,many Global South nations have successfully navigated internal conflicts and negotiated peace agreements. Their experience navigating complex peace processes can be invaluable in finding lasting solutions in Ukraine.

Financial and logistical Support

While some European nations might face limitations on direct military involvement, they can offer considerable financial and logistical support to a Global South-led peacekeeping force. This contribution could solidify Europe’s stake in the peace process, reassure the global south of its commitment to a collective solution, and mitigate the risk of further escalation.

Redefining Security in Europe

This opportunity presents a chance for Europe to redefine its security strategy, embracing the Global South as a vital partner in stabilizing the region. By fostering collaboration and inclusivity, the international community can build a sustainable peace in Ukraine, rooted in shared obligation and global cooperation.

Dr.Petrova concludes, “The international community must move beyond traditional power dynamics and embrace a more inclusive and collaborative approach to peacebuilding. A Global South-led peacekeeping force offers a unique opportunity to achieve a lasting and equitable peace in Ukraine.”

`

A New Path to peace: Embracing Global South Leadership

The war in Ukraine has highlighted the limitations of traditional peacekeeping models. While many nations have condemned the aggression and offered support, finding a sustainable path to peace remains a formidable challenge. A fresh perspective is needed, one that moves beyond established geopolitical blocs and embraces the unique strengths of nations in the Global South.

Beyond Traditional Power Structures

Instead of relying solely on established powers, a peacekeeping force led by nations like India, Indonesia, Mexico, and Brazil could offer a more effective and inclusive approach. “rather, a force drawn from nations in the Global South, like India, Indonesia, Mexico, and Brazil, could be invaluable,” experts suggest. These countries, with their diverse perspectives, existing diplomatic ties, and non-aligned stances, offer unique strengths.

advantages of a Global South-Led Approach

• Past Experience: Countries from the Global South have a proven track record of engaging with all parties involved in conflicts, fostering dialogue, and building trust.
• Flexibility and Neutrality: Unbound by Cold War alliances, these nations can navigate complex political landscapes with greater agility and impartiality.
• Diverse expertise: A force comprised of personnel from different backgrounds and cultures brings a wider range of perspectives and skillsets to peacekeeping efforts.
• Strong Regional Ties: Their deep connections within their respective regions can facilitate interaction, cooperation, and conflict resolution.

Minimizing risks and Escalation

A Global South-led force can significantly reduce the risk of escalation. As experts note, “This approach also minimizes the risk of escalation. The international community has learned a painful lesson about unintended consequences from military interventions. A peacekeeping force composed primarily of nations from outside major geopolitical blocs substantially reduces the risk of dragging powerful actors like NATO and Russia further into conflict.”

supporting a Global South-led Force

Countries in Europe, north America, and Asia can play vital supporting roles. European nations like France, Germany, and the UK could contribute logistical support, funding, and technical expertise in areas such as training, medical facilities, and communications networks. North American countries, along with China and Japan, can leverage their economic influence to facilitate aid packages, reconstruction efforts, and sustainable development projects in Ukraine.

A Future of Global Cooperation

The Ukraine crisis presents an unprecedented opportunity to rethink peacekeeping. By embracing the expertise and goodwill of nations beyond traditional players, the international community can build a future of global cooperation and lasting peace. “The international community must shift its thinking about peacemaking. The Ukraine crisis presents an unprecedented chance.Let’s embrace the expertise and goodwill of nations beyond the traditional players and build a future of global cooperation for lasting peace.”

This is a call to action. Let us work together to create a more inclusive and effective peacekeeping framework, one that truly serves the needs of all nations.