Reporter Cai Yifang / Comprehensive Report
Mainland male star Tong Zhuo revealed that he cheated in his college entrance examination in 2020. After verification by relevant units, not only the college graduation certificate was cancelled, but his father’s official position was also implicated. However, he recently accused himself of being “cheated” and sued the recruitment center. On the 13th, he even revealed suspicious details of the other party and asked the judiciary to give him a chance to defend himself.
▲Tong Zhuo’s acting career was completely destroyed in 2020 due to rumors of exam fraud. (Photo/Retrieved from Weibo/Tongzhuo)
Tong Zhuo responded to netizens’ questions on Weibo on the 13th. First, he believed that the Shanxi Provincial Recruitment Center was suspected of making false statements during the court trial. Go to Tongzhuo’s registration and sign the documents”, but Tongzhuo revealed that the 2013 college entrance examination (university examination) only has on-site registration, and there is no online registration method. In the application form’, the candidate category is the previous year. During the process of entering and studying in the Chinese Academy of Drama, I filled in the relevant resume, and I did not fill in the so-called false high school status.” He questioned and said, “Why is this enough proof for me? Is the most direct material (“College Entrance Examination Information Confirmation Form”) missing for the new year or the previous year?”
[廣告]Please read on…
▲Tongzhuo responded to the key points about reporting to the recruitment center. (Photo/Retrieved from Weibo/Tongzhuo)
The second point, Tong Zhuo pointed out that the recruitment center did not follow the normal procedures and did not fulfill the obligation to inform him when he punished him. He only learned about it through the Internet. According to the “Administrative Punishment Law”, the recruitment center is suspected of violating the regulations. “The administrative organ cannot deprive me of my procedural rights on the grounds that I cannot be found.
In the end, Tong Zhuo said that during the court session, his lawyer mentioned that the admissions center made an administrative penalty decision on the wrong object, the evidence for punishment was insufficient, the statutory triggering conditions were expanded without authorization, and the punishment had expired. The content and basis of his punishment were seriously inconsistent with his own experience and memory, so he spoke out publicly and demanded a trial by the judiciary.
Many netizens expressed their support for Tongzhuo’s PO article, believing that “people suing officials” was already difficult, and hoped that Tongzhuo could persevere. He “gets cheap and sells well”, “does a thief and shouts to catch a thief”.
▲ Tong Zhuo responded. (Photo/Retrieved from Weibo/Tongzhuo)