Home » Economy » UN Peacekeeping in Congo Faces Renewal Amid Controversy

UN Peacekeeping in Congo Faces Renewal Amid Controversy

by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief

UN Peacekeeping Mandate in Congo Faces Renewal Amidst Controversy

UN Peacekeeping in Congo Faces Renewal Amid Controversy

The United Nations peacekeeping mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo, known as MONUSCO, faces a crucial juncture as its mandate undergoes renewal at the UN Security Council in New York. After 25 years in the region, the mission has drawn criticism from the Congolese population and is now initiating a gradual disengagement from the volatile eastern provinces.

Eastern Congo Remains Plagued by Violence as Withdrawal Begins

Despite the planned withdrawal, the eastern region continues to grapple with persistent violence perpetrated by various armed groups, highlighting the complex challenges facing the peacekeeping force. Just as discussions regarding MONUSCO’s future intensify, the UN Security Council convened to assess the security situation in the eastern DRC.

The renewal of the mandate comes amidst a backdrop of escalating violence and humanitarian concerns. While MONUSCO has played a significant role in protecting civilians and supporting peace processes, its presence has also sparked debate about its effectiveness and long-term contribution to stability in the region.

Ghana’s Opposition Leader Wins Presidential Election

In other African news, Ghana’s former president, John Mahama, has emerged victorious in the presidential election, securing 56% of the vote and defeating the ruling party’s candidate and incumbent vice president, Mahamudu Bawumia.

The results, announced by the Electoral Commission on Monday, mark a significant shift in the Ghanaian political landscape. Mahama, who previously served as president from 2012 to 2017, campaigned on promises of economic revival and job creation.

French Court Convicts Journalist for Rwanda Genocide Denial

In a landmark legal case, Franco-Cameroonian journalist Charles Onana and his editor were convicted by a Paris criminal court for contesting the Rwandan genocide. The decision followed a complaint lodged by survivors’ groups, who denounced what they perceived as negationist passages in one of Onana’s books published in 2019.

During his trial, Onana maintained his innocence and asserted that his writings represented a legitimate exploration of historical debate rather than an attempt to deny the genocide. However, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, highlighting the legal and ethical implications of Holocaust and genocide denial.

Onana has announced his intention to appeal the conviction, reiterating his commitment to freedom of speech and historical research. The case has reignited discussions about the boundaries of historical inquiry and the responsibility of journalists and writers when addressing sensitive topics like genocide.

What are the main criticisms leveled against MONUSCO’s performance over its 25-year presence in the DRC?

##​ Announcer:

Tonight on the show, we are talking about the⁢ challenging decision⁤ before the‍ UN Security Council: renew ⁣the‌ mandate for MONUSCO, the peacekeeping force ⁤in​ the Democratic Republic of Congo, or allow⁣ it to wind down after ⁤25 years? Joining us tonight to discuss this ⁣complex ⁢issue is‌ Dr. Marie N’Jumba, an expert on⁣ conflict resolution in sub-Saharan Africa.

Dr. N’Jumba,⁢ thank you for being​ wiht us. ‍The⁣ situation in eastern Congo is dire,‌ with ongoing violence fuelled by numerous armed groups.Critics argue‌ that MONUSCO has failed to ⁤stem the tide of violence and has even become‌ a target itself.

What⁤ are your thoughts ​on the effectiveness of MONUSCO​ after two and a half decades?

##

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.