Home » News » UnitedHealth’s HouseCalls Under Scrutiny as DOJ Investigates

UnitedHealth’s HouseCalls Under Scrutiny as DOJ Investigates

by

Healthcare Giant UnitedHealth Faces Headwinds, Slashes Earnings Forecast

breaking news: UnitedHealth Group (UNH) has considerably lowered its adjusted earnings per share (EPS) outlook for the current year, a move that has sent ripples through the healthcare sector. The company now anticipates adjusted EPS to fall between $21.50 and $22.50, a stark contrast to its previous projection of at least $24.50. This downward revision follows a similar cautionary signal from fellow insurer molina Healthcare, which has also adjusted its financial guidance.

Molina Healthcare’s Challenging Quarter: Adding to the sector’s concerns,molina Healthcare recently revised its full-year EPS forecast downwards to a range of $21.50 to $22.50. For the second quarter of 2025 specifically,Molina is now projecting adjusted earnings of approximately $5.50 per share.

Centene Corporation’s Precedent: This trend of lowered expectations was preceded by Centene Corporation (CNC). In early July, Centene withdrew its financial outlook, citing persistently high medical costs and unexpected shifts in enrollment. The announcement led to significant stock price declines for Centene, with industry peers like UnitedHealth and molina afterward experiencing similar market reactions.

UnitedHealth’s Market Performance and Valuation: The challenges facing the sector are reflected in unitedhealth’s stock performance. Year-to-date, UNH shares have seen a decline of 40.2%,underperforming the broader industry’s 31.1% drop. From a valuation perspective, UnitedHealth is currently trading at a forward P/E ratio of 12.82, which is higher than the industry average of 11.64. The stock holds a B Value Score according to Zacks.

Analyst Estimates and Outlook: Current analyst consensus estimates UnitedHealth’s 2025 earnings at $21.85 per share, indicating a important 21% decrease compared to the previous year. Consequently, UnitedHealth currently carries a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell).

Evergreen insights for Investors:

Sector-Wide Pressures: The downward revisions from multiple major health insurers like Molina and Centene, and now UnitedHealth, signal potential systemic issues within the healthcare industry. Investors should monitor the underlying causes, such as rising medical costs and enrollment volatility, as these could continue to impact profitability across the sector.
Importance of Guidance: Earnings guidance is a crucial indicator of a company’s future performance. Significant downward revisions,as seen with UnitedHealth,often signal that previously anticipated growth drivers are faltering or that unexpected headwinds have emerged.
Valuation Amidst Decline: While UnitedHealth’s stock has declined, its forward P/E ratio remains above the industry average. This suggests that the market may still be pricing in a higher level of expected future earnings than what is currently being forecasted. Investors should carefully assess whether the current valuation adequately reflects the revised outlook and the ongoing sector challenges.
Analyst Ratings as Indicators: A “Strong Sell” rating from a reputable analyst firm like Zacks often serves as a warning to investors. It suggests that, based on current data and analysis, the stock is considered overvalued or facing significant basic challenges that are likely to lead to further price depreciation.
Diversification and Risk Management: This news underscores the importance of diversification in investment portfolios, especially within cyclical or sensitive sectors like healthcare. Spreading investments across different industries and asset classes can definitely help mitigate the impact of adverse news affecting a single company or sector.
Long-Term vs.Short-Term: While short-term performance can be volatile, understanding the long-term structural factors affecting the healthcare industry is crucial.Changes in regulatory policy, advancements in medical technology, and demographic shifts can all have lasting impacts on profitability. Investors should consider these broader trends when making investment decisions.

What are the specific allegations of fraud related to unitedhealth’s HouseCalls program and how do they connect to medicare Advantage risk adjustment?

UnitedHealth’s HouseCalls Under Scrutiny as DOJ Investigates

what is UnitedHealth’s HouseCalls Program?

UnitedHealth Group’s HouseCalls is an in-home health assessment program designed to proactively identify health risks and connect members with appropriate care. Registered nurses and paramedics visit members’ homes to conduct thorough health evaluations, including:

physical Assessments: Measuring vital signs like blood pressure, heart rate, and weight.

Medication Reconciliation: Reviewing current medications to ensure accuracy and identify potential interactions.

Fall Risk Assessments: Evaluating home environments for potential hazards.

Chronic Condition Management: Providing support and education for individuals with conditions like diabetes and heart disease.

Preventive Screening Referrals: Connecting members with recommended screenings and vaccinations.

The program aims to improve member health outcomes, reduce hospital readmissions, and lower overall healthcare costs. It’s a key component of UnitedHealth’s broader strategy to shift towards value-based care and preventative medicine. Though, recent Department of Justice (DOJ) scrutiny casts a shadow over these intentions.

The DOJ Investigation: Allegations and Concerns

The Department of Justice launched a formal investigation into unitedhealth’s HouseCalls program in early July 2025,focusing on allegations of systematically inflating risk scores to justify higher payments from medicare Advantage.This investigation centers around claims that HouseCalls assessments were not always conducted with the necessary medical necessity, and that data collected was sometimes inaccurate or misrepresented.

Key concerns driving the DOJ investigation include:

Risk Adjustment Fraud: medicare Advantage plans receive payments based on the health risk of their enrolled members. Higher risk scores translate to higher payments. The DOJ alleges UnitedHealth intentionally inflated these scores through HouseCalls.

Medical Necessity concerns: The core question is whether the in-home visits and subsequent diagnoses were genuinely necessary for the member’s health, or were primarily conducted to gather data for risk adjustment.

Data Accuracy: Reports suggest inconsistencies in the data collected during HouseCalls visits, raising questions about the reliability of the details used for risk scoring.

Potential for Overbilling: Inflated risk scores directly lead to overbilling of the Medicare program, perhaps costing taxpayers billions of dollars.

Medicare advantage and Risk adjustment: A Primer

understanding the DOJ’s concerns requires a grasp of how Medicare Advantage (MA) works and the role of risk adjustment.

medicare Advantage allows private insurance companies, like UnitedHealth, to offer Medicare benefits. These plans are paid a fixed amount per member by the government.

Risk adjustment is a system designed to account for the varying health needs of individuals enrolled in MA plans. It adjusts payments to plans based on the health status of their members. Individuals with chronic conditions or complex health needs are assigned higher risk scores, resulting in increased payments to the plan. This is intended to incentivize plans to enroll and care for sicker individuals.

However,the system is vulnerable to abuse. If a plan can artificially inflate risk scores, it can receive higher payments without actually providing more care. This is where the allegations against UnitedHealth’s HouseCalls program come into play.

UnitedHealth’s Response and Potential Consequences

UnitedHealth has publicly stated its commitment to cooperating fully with the DOJ investigation. The company maintains that its HouseCalls program is designed to improve member health and that all assessments are conducted in accordance with applicable regulations.

Though, the potential consequences of the investigation are critically important:

Financial Penalties: If found liable, UnitedHealth could face significant fines and penalties.

Reputational Damage: The investigation has already damaged UnitedHealth’s reputation and could erode trust among members and stakeholders.

Program Modifications: The DOJ may require UnitedHealth to modify its HouseCalls program to ensure greater accuracy and medical necessity.

Criminal Charges: In severe cases, individuals within unitedhealth could face criminal charges related to fraud.

Increased Regulatory Scrutiny: The investigation is likely to lead to increased scrutiny of all Medicare Advantage plans and their risk adjustment practices.

Impact on Patients and Healthcare Access

The DOJ investigation raises concerns about the potential impact on patients. While the program aims to improve care, the allegations suggest a focus on financial gain over patient well-being.

Erosion of Trust: Patients may become hesitant to participate in in-home health assessments if they fear their data will be used inappropriately.

Disruption of Care: If the HouseCalls program is significantly altered or suspended, it could disrupt care for members who rely on the service.

Broader Implications for Preventative Care: The investigation could discourage other healthcare providers from investing in preventative care programs if they fear similar scrutiny.

What’s Next? The Timeline and Key Developments

the DOJ investigation is ongoing as of July 10, 2025. Key developments to watch include:

document Requests and Subpoenas: The DOJ is highly likely to issue numerous document requests and subpoenas to unitedhealth and its employees.

Witness Interviews: Investigators will interview current and former UnitedHealth employees, and also members who have participated in the HouseCalls program.

Data Analysis: The DOJ will conduct a thorough analysis of HouseCalls data to identify any patterns of fraud or abuse.

* Potential Whistleblower Testimony: Whistleblower lawsuits could provide additional evidence to support the DOJ’s investigation.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.