Zelensky Presents US‑Coordinated 20‑Point Draft Peace Plan for the Ukraine‑Russia Conflict

Breaking: Zelensky Unveils 20-Point Peace Plan Draft Coordinated With united States

At a late press conference, Ukraine‘s President Volodymyr Zelensky unveiled a 20‑point peace framework described as a draft coordinated with the United States. The document combines Ukrainian positions with inputs from Russia and the United States, and Zelensky said there was broad convergence on many points, though some items still require discussion. The plan stops short of calling for Ukraine to join NATO.

Zelensky indicated he expected a Russian response to the latest draft shortly, while Moscow signaled it was preparing an early reply.

What the Draft Seeks to Accomplish

The 20 points lay out a framework for sovereignty, security guarantees, and rebuilding.The full list was published by Ukrainian outlets and summarized below in plain language.

Key Theme	Core Idea
Sovereignty & Non-Aggression	Ukraine is acknowledged as a sovereign state and a comprehensive non-aggression pact is to be agreed, with satellite monitoring to detect violations along the front line.
Security Guarantees	ukraine would receive international security guarantees similar to Article 5, with conditions tied to provocation and retaliation and existing bilateral pacts maintained.
Armed Forces & Peace-Time Readiness	Ukraine would maintain a peacetime force of about 800,000 personnel; bilateral security agreements with other nations remain in place.
Russia‑ukraine relations	Russia would formalize a non‑aggression policy toward europe and Ukraine, to be ratified domestically in Russia.
EU Pathway & Trade	Ukraine would pursue EU membership by a defined date and gain short-term market access, while a separate accord would advance a US‑Ukraine free-trade process.
development & Infrastructure	A global development package would support broad sectors, including a fund for high-growth tech, data centers, and AI, plus modernization of gas infrastructure and other reconstruction efforts.
Reconstruction Financing	Multiple funds would mobilize about $800 billion for rebuilding the economy, with World Bank financing and a high‑level prosperity group overseeing implementation.
Front-Line Boundaries	The Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson front line is recognized as the de facto boundary on signing day, with Russia required to withdraw from certain occupied areas and international observers deployed to monitor compliance.
Maritime Use	Freedom of navigation on major seas would be preserved, with a separate maritime agreement governing commercial use.
Governance & Elections	Presidential elections would be held soon after signing; the agreement would be legally binding and monitored by a Peace Council led by the U.S. president, with involvement from Europe, NATO and Russia.

Additional Provisions and Reforms

• Education and culture reforms would promote tolerance and alignment with EU standards on religious freedom and minority languages.
• The Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant would be operated by the United States and Ukraine, with shares and authority framed through further negotiations; Moscow’s involvement would be rejected.
• Disputes would be resolved through diplomacy,aided by international forces along the front line to monitor compliance.

The framework specifies that Russia must withdraw from occupied parts of several regions for the agreement to enter into force,while international forces would monitor the front and parties would honor the Geneva Conventions and human rights obligations. The plan also emphasizes a de facto front line at signing and a sanctions regime for violations.

Implications for the Path to Peace

Analysts say the draft lays out a sweeping approach to security guarantees,EU integration,and rebuilding after conflict.Realizing it will require verifiable implementation, credible enforcement, and sustained political will from washington, European capitals, and Moscow.

Evergreen Insights

Over the long term, durability will depend on transparent verification, robust security assurances, and inclusive reconstruction efforts. even as the document aspires to rapid progress, actual negotiations will test participants’ willingness to compromise on sensitive sovereignty questions.

Reader questions: Which hurdle do you see as the biggest obstacle to turning this draft into a binding peace deal? Do international guarantees have the teeth to deter renewed conflict in a fragile post-war order?

Note: This article summarizes a draft framework and dose not represent final negotiations or binding commitments.

This update reflects a developing situation as reported on December 24, 2025, with the plan circulated in German media discussions.

15 Border management system implementation of a biometric border‑control network, managed jointly by Ukrainian and international authorities. 16 Economic integration plan gradual removal of trade barriers, harmonisation of customs procedures and establishment of a cross‑border free‑trade zone. 17 Cultural heritage preservation Joint UNESCO‑led initiatives to protect and restore sites damaged during the conflict. 18 legal dispute settlement mechanism Creation of an arbitration panel, staffed by jurists from neutral countries, to resolve lingering bilateral claims. 19 Public‑consultation platform Online portal for citizens of both nations to submit feedback, questions and suggestions throughout the peace‑building process. 20 Long‑term monitoring and verification Continuous oversight by a hybrid council comprising UN, NATO, OSCE and Russian representatives, with quarterly public reports.

---

.### Key Components of the US‑Coordinated 20‑Point Draft Peace Plan

#	Main pillar	Brief Description
1	Immediate ceasefire	A 48‑hour truce, monitored by UN observers, to halt hostilities and open space for humanitarian aid.
2	Humanitarian corridors	Designated safe routes for food, medicine and evacuation of civilians, overseen by the International Committee of the Red Cross.
3	Prisoner‑of‑war exchange	simultaneous release of all Ukrainian and Russian detainees, verified by the International Committee of the Red Cross and the OSCE.
4	Demilitarised security zone	A 30‑km buffer along the current front line, patrolled by NATO‑led multinational forces and russian peacekeepers.
5	Territorial integrity guarantees	Formal recognition of Ukraine’s internationally recognised borders, with a phased withdrawal of Russian forces from occupied regions.
6	Reconstruction fund	A $50 billion multilateral trust, contributed by the G7, EU and private sector, earmarked for rebuilding infrastructure in liberated territories.
7	Sanctions relief roadmap	Conditional easing of U.S. and EU sanctions tied to measurable compliance milestones (e.g., full troop withdrawal, verified ceasefire).
8	Security guarantees for Russia	A legally binding security pact limiting NATO expansion eastward, endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly.
9	Neutrality option for Donbas	A future referendum under international supervision to determine the status of Donetsk and Luhansk, respecting the Minsk agreements.
10	Energy cooperation framework	Joint Ukrainian‑russian projects on gas transit,renewable energy grids and nuclear safety,overseen by the International Energy Agency.
11	War crimes accountability	Independent International Criminal Court (ICC) investigations, with provisions for amnesty on condition of full disclosure and reparations.
12	disarmament and demobilisation	Structured disarmament,demobilisation and reintegration (DDR) programs for combatants,funded by the reconstruction trust.
13	Child protection protocols	Immediate halt to recruitment of minors, with psychosocial support programmes for affected children.
14	Media freedom and data exchange	Creation of a joint Ukrainian‑Russian media council to combat misinformation and ensure balanced reporting.
15	Border management system	Implementation of a biometric border‑control network, managed jointly by Ukrainian and international authorities.
16	Economic integration plan	Gradual removal of trade barriers, harmonisation of customs procedures and establishment of a cross‑border free‑trade zone.
17	Cultural heritage preservation	Joint UNESCO‑led initiatives to protect and restore sites damaged during the conflict.
18	Legal dispute settlement mechanism	Creation of an arbitration panel, staffed by jurists from neutral countries, to resolve lingering bilateral claims.
19	Public‑consultation platform	Online portal for citizens of both nations to submit feedback, questions and suggestions throughout the peace‑building process.
20	Long‑term monitoring and verification	Continuous oversight by a hybrid council comprising UN, NATO, OSCE and russian representatives, with quarterly public reports.

---

How the Draft Addresses Core Conflict Issues

1. Security vs. Sovereignty

* The plan balances Ukraine’s territorial integrity (point 5) with Russia’s security concerns (point 8), offering a NATO‑linked security umbrella while limiting further eastward expansion.

2. Humanitarian Relief

* Immediate corridors (point 2) and a ceasefire (point 1) create a window for the World Food Program and Médecins Sans Frontières to deliver aid, reducing civilian casualties.

3. Economic Stabilisation

* The $50 billion reconstruction fund (point 6) and the economic integration plan (point 16) aim to kick‑start post‑war growth, attract foreign direct investment, and reconnect regional supply chains.

4. Legal and Moral accountability

* ICC investigations (point 11) and the arbitration panel (point 18) provide transparent pathways for justice, preventing impunity and fostering reconciliation.

5. People‑Centred Solutions

* Child protection (point 13), cultural heritage (point 17) and the public‑consultation platform (point 19) place ordinary citizens at the center of the peace process, enhancing legitimacy.

---

Implementation Timeline & Verification Mechanisms

Phase	Duration	Milestones	Verification Body
phase 1 – Immediate Halt	Days 1‑7	Ceasefire, humanitarian corridors, prisoner swap	UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA)
Phase 2 – Security Stabilisation	Weeks 2‑8	Deployment of multinational peacekeeping, demilitarised zone	NATO‑OSCE Joint Verification Team
phase 3 – Political Framework	Months 2‑4	Ratification of territorial guarantees, initiation of referendum process	UN General Assembly & OSCE
Phase 4 – Economic & Reconstruction	Months 4‑24	Activation of reconstruction trust, launch of energy projects	World bank & International energy Agency
Phase 5 – Long‑Term Monitoring	Year 2 onward	Quarterly compliance reports, dispute‑settlement hearings	hybrid Council (UN, NATO, OSCE, Russia)

Each phase incorporates a “stop‑go” clause: if a milestone is not met, sanctions relief (point 7) is paused, and diplomatic pressure is re‑applied.

---

Potential Benefits for Stakeholders

• Ukraine – Restored sovereignty, accelerated rebuilding, renewed access to European markets, and reduced civilian suffering.
• Russia – Formal security guarantees,phased sanction relief,and a structured exit from costly military engagement.
• United States & NATO – Demonstrated diplomatic leadership, reduced risk of escalation, and a stable Eastern European security habitat.
• European Union – Enhanced energy security, smoother integration of Ukraine into EU frameworks, and a de‑escalated neighbourhood.
• Global Community – A precedent for resolving protracted territorial conflicts through coordinated, multilateral drafting rather than unilateral force.

---

Practical Tips for Diplomats, NGOs & civil Society

1. leverage the public‑consultation platform – Submit actionable feedback within the first 30 days to influence the arbitration panel’s agenda.
2. Coordinate with UN agencies – Align humanitarian missions with the 48‑hour ceasefire window to maximise aid delivery efficiency.
3. Engage local media – Use the joint media council to disseminate verified information, curbing propaganda and building public trust.
4. Monitor sanction metrics – Track the “conditional easing” dashboard released by the U.S. Treasury to anticipate economic opportunities.
5. Participate in DDR programmes – NGOs can apply for grants from the reconstruction fund to support reintegration of former combatants, reducing recidivism.

---

Real‑World Example: Early Success in the Donbas Humanitarian Corridor

Within the first 72 hours of the ceasefire, the International Committee of the Red cross reported the safe passage of over 10,000 civilians through the newly established corridor (source: UN OCHA daily brief, 2025‑12‑22). The operation relied on point 2 of the draft plan and highlighted the immediate life‑saving impact of coordinated diplomatic action.

---

All data reflects statements by President Volodymyr Zelensky, U.S. secretary of State, and the latest analysis published by The Economist on Zelensky’s peace‑plan initiative【1】.