1. “Lawyer Un” Exposes Fan Clubs Sending 500,000 Baht to “Lawyer Tam” for Uncle Phon’s Case, But Money Not Received 2. Evidence Shows Fan Clubs Transferring Money to “Lawyer Tam” for Uncle Phon’s Case, But “Lawyer Un” Claims 500,000 Baht Not Received 3. Fan Clubs Help “Lawyer Tam” with Uncle Phon’s Case by Sending 500,000 Baht, but “Lawyer Un” Reveals Money Not Received

Attorney Un has presented evidence that fan clubs had transferred money amounting to 500,000 baht to Attorney Tam for Uncle Phon’s case but did not receive it. On April 1, 2023, Attorney An submitted evidence claiming to be a transfer slip of money for Uncle Phon’s case, where fans from abroad transferred 500,000 baht to Lawyer Tam. Lawyer Tam had requested 300,000 baht from the client and claimed it as risk cost. It is said that Uncle Phon’s name was mentioned in some parts of the statement, which resulted in a fan club sending the proof of transfer of 400,000 baht to Lawyer Tam from the US and 100,000 baht from a fan club in Canada. After discussing Uncle Phon’s case, Lawyer Tam sent a quote of 3 million baht, which the fan clubs deemed too expensive, resulting in the amount being reduced to 2 million baht. Fans from the US thereafter invited donations through Lawyer Tam’s foundation’s account to raise funds for Uncle Phon’s fan club. Attorney Un called out Lawyer Tam’s behavior, and made a complaint to the President of the Lawyers Council in Bangkok. It is expected that Lawyer Tam’s behavior would be examined for any violation of lawyers’ conduct or matters detrimental to the dignity of the lawyer.

Ouch out loud 3 times! ‘Lawyer Un’ reveals evidence of fan clubs transferring money to Lawyer Tam 500,000 baht to help with Uncle Phon’s case, but did not receive the money.

On April 1, 2023, Mr. Pattarapong Supaksorn or Attorney An brought evidence claiming to be a money transfer slip that “Uncle Phon” fans abroad transferred money to help with the case of Uncle Phon in the amount of 5. 100,000 baht into the account “People’s Lawyer Team Foundation for Youth and Society” of Sitra Bianbangkerd or Lawyer Tum after Lawyer Tum has come out to announce the case of the complaint alleging that the money was demanded 3 Hundred thousand baht from the client, claiming that it is a risk cost But in some parts of the statement, there was mention of the case of Uncle Phon or Mr. Chaiphon Wipha that during the 6 months that Kok Kok did not have a job, the family was in trouble.

But when he came out to post on social media about Lawyer Tam’s behavior who called for a risk of 3 hundred thousand baht from the client, there was a fan club of Uncle Phon, abbreviated T, who was in the United States. sent the proof of the money transfer slip to see that there was a transfer of money to lawyer Tam 4 hundred thousand baht, and the fan club in Canada, abbreviated N, transferred money to lawyer Tam another 1 hundred thousand baht, a total of 5 hundred thousand baht

After that, there was a discussion about how much would Uncle Phon’s case be. Lawyer Tam then assessed And sent a quote that was 3 million baht, fans in America and Canada said that 3 million baht was too much, so they agreed to reduce it to 2 million baht, which lawyer Tam told the fan club to transfer money to the foundation’s account. lawyer for the people

After that, fans in America There was an invitation to raise funds for Uncle Phon’s fan club. Let’s help donate via money transfer to the account of Lawyer Tam’s foundation. which the information provided by Uncle Phon’s fan club He did not know how true it was. But if Attorney Tam sincere Take the bank statement during the time that Lawyer Tam went to Ban Kok Kok for 6-7 months and reveal it to the public, then he will know if the money has actually been transferred or not.

Lawyer Un said that he brought the information out because he saw that Lawyer Tum’s actions disgrace the lawyer profession However, from the incident, he made a complaint to the President of the Lawyers Council in Bangkok. in order to examine the behavior of Attorney Tam Whether it is a violation of lawyer’s conduct or not and how

If examined, it is found that the behavior That is contrary to the Lawyers Council’s regulations on Lawyers’ etiquette, 1986, on conducting oneself which is a violation of good morals or detrimental to the dignity and prestige of the lawyer should consider punishment according to the regulations of the Lawyers Council

matichon



In conclusion, the allegations made by Lawyer Un regarding the transfer of funds to Lawyer Tam have brought to light a potential violation of the Lawyers Council’s regulations on conduct and etiquette. It remains to be seen whether there will be any punishment meted out to Lawyer Tam, but the incident has certainly raised questions about the ethics and professionalism of some members of the legal profession. Regardless, it is important to remember that these allegations are still unproven and that everyone is innocent until proven guilty. As always, it is crucial to approach these situations with an open mind and to trust in the proper channels of investigation and justice.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.