In recent years, the implementation of VPNs has gradually become commonplace. Initially rather reserved for internet users working in the digital sector, or even hackers or users of the dark web, VPNs are on the way to becoming tools open to the general public.
A virtual private network (VPN) or VPN, from English virtual private network, provides some sort of isolation from the overall Internet traffic. It is thus possible, for example, to enter into direct communication with another computer without being visible on the network, as if a kind of tunnel were established between the two interfaces.
When you use your computer, tablet or phone to indulge in the pleasure of digital reading, it may seem more secure to go through a VPN. If you navigate using the little fire fox, you can for example use Firefox VPN free, which will ensure transparent and protected exchanges. If the question arises in France mainly for security reasons to guard against virus attacks and hacking of personal data, in other countries, it is the solution to override local censorship rules.
It should not be forgotten that throughout the world, many people are subject to restricted navigation conditions. If Russia has hit the headlines recently on this point, many other countries practice this form of censorship. Nevertheless, in Russia, a long tradition of very free use of the Internet allows many Internet users to ignore the digital barriers implemented, in particular thanks to the particularly widespread use of VPNs.
Since the first periods of confinement, and the massive development of telework, VPNs have gradually imposed themselves on the French market, and this growth no longer seems to be slowed down. The year 2021 thus saw an increase of 184% compared to 2020. More and more individuals have adopted the VPN as a tool for securing their Internet browsing.
But it is also ignoring the possibilities of circumvention which also push certain users to adopt this technology. Indeed, it is then possible to ignore the blockages implemented for different streaming services. From one country to another the rules are not the same, which can lead to very different catalogues. By hiding his country of origin, it is thus possible to manage to listen to music, read books or watch films which are not yet accessible in France for example.
Be careful though, we are entering into a practice that amounts to circumventing well-established legal rules, particularly in the field of what is called media chronology for films, and copyright for books. Not every country imposes the same restrictions on how long a work falls into the public domain.
For example, if in France it is necessary to wait 70 years after the death of the author of a book for his works to become freely accessible, in Canada, this period is only 50 years. Specifically, you can access works of Albert Camus if you are a Canadian citizen, which is not the case in France since the writer died in 1960. You will therefore have to wait another eight years.