<div id="firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type="article" data-bind-html-compile="article.body" data-first-article-body="
The court upheld the judgment of the first instance issued by the court Elimination The administrator refused stabbing Submitted by teacher Department assistant English language Faculty of Education, University of SuezMona Prince, against a decision the Universitydismissed from her job.
Mona Prince had sparked controversy in June 2017, when she posted videos on her Facebook page, dancing semi-naked and encouraging her followers and students to do so.
In June 2018, Suez University announced the dismissal of the aforementioned professor from her job after a legal investigation and a referral to the university’s disciplinary board.
Mona Prince, for her part, filed an appeal against the decision to dismiss her before the Administrative Court, which rejected her appeal, so she appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court, which upheld the ruling of the administrative judiciary and rejected Mona Prince’s appeal as well.
In its ruling issued on Monday, the Supreme Administrative Court said that the decision Suez University The dismissal of Mona Prince from her job has valid legal justifications, and that the aforementioned committed the two violations attributed to her.
The court explained that the first violation committed by Mona Prince was that she published several videos in which she danced on her page on the social networking site Facebook, with her insistence on repeating the publication of new clips, which degrades the prestige of the university professor and his message and his responsibility for spreading values and advancement.
The court affirmed that this violation degrades the university professor, and that it is not permissible for a university professor to use dancing as a slogan in which she invites people, in a way that undermines her prestige in front of her students, hurts the feelings of her students, and touches the pride of her female colleagues, companions in the paths of knowledge.
The court stated that the second violation committed by Mona Prince was her departure from the scientific curriculum of the academic curricula, and her dissemination of destructive ideas that violate divine beliefs and public order.
The court explained that the aforementioned, during the lectures, challenged religious constants and told the students that Satan was a good person and was subjected to injustice and was expressing his freedom by refusing orders, and called on the students to imitate what Satan did, and not to adhere to the teachings of religions.
The court condemned what Mona Prince said and said in the merits of her ruling that academic freedom does not mean denial of what is known by religion by necessity, challenging the essence of God Almighty with His creatures, spreading doubt in the hearts of students about the afterlife, and glorifying Satan against his creator in violation of the teachings of religions.
The court indicated that it issued its ruling after it was certain that Mona Prince committed the aforementioned violations, and saw a CD with videos and photos of her dancing and acknowledged her health, and that her Facebook page is available to everyone, including her students and the media, which necessitated her discipline by dismissal from the job.
The court stressed that the university professor’s actions are accountable to him and do not deviate from the general context of the state, and any violation he commits degrades him and affects his mission in society.
“>
The court upheld the judgment of the first instance issued by the court Elimination The administrator refused stabbing Submitted by teacher Department assistant English language Faculty of Education, University of SuezMona Prince, against a decision the Universitydismissed from her job.
Mona Prince had sparked controversy in June 2017, when she posted videos on her Facebook page, dancing semi-naked and encouraging her followers and students to do so.
In June 2018, Suez University announced the dismissal of the aforementioned professor from her job after a legal investigation and a referral to the university’s disciplinary board.
Mona Prince, for her part, filed an appeal against the decision to dismiss her before the Administrative Court, which rejected her appeal, so she appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court, which upheld the ruling of the administrative judiciary and rejected Mona Prince’s appeal as well.
In its ruling issued on Monday, the Supreme Administrative Court said that the decision Suez University The dismissal of Mona Prince from her job has valid legal justifications, and that the aforementioned committed the two violations attributed to her.
The court explained that the first violation committed by Mona Prince was that she published several videos in which she danced on her page on the social networking site Facebook, with her insistence on repeating the publication of new clips, which degrades the prestige of the university professor and his message and his responsibility for spreading values and advancement.
The court affirmed that this violation degrades the university professor, and that it is not permissible for a university professor to use dancing as a slogan in which she invites people, in a way that undermines her prestige in front of her students, hurts the feelings of her students, and touches the pride of her female colleagues, companions in the paths of knowledge.
The court stated that the second violation committed by Mona Prince was her departure from the scientific curriculum of the academic curricula, and her dissemination of destructive ideas that violate divine beliefs and public order.
The court explained that the aforementioned, during the lectures, challenged the religious constants and told the students that Satan was a good person and was subjected to injustice and was expressing his freedom by refusing orders.
The court condemned what Mona Prince said and said in the rationale for her ruling that academic freedom does not mean denial of what is known by religion by necessity, challenging the essence of God Almighty with His creatures, spreading doubt in the hearts of students about the afterlife, and glorifying Satan against his creator in violation of the teachings of religions.
The court indicated that it issued its ruling after it was certain that Mona Prince committed the aforementioned violations, and saw a CD with videos and pictures of her dancing and acknowledged her health, and that her Facebook page is available to everyone, including her students and the media, which necessitated her discipline by dismissal from the job.
The court stressed that the university professor’s actions are accountable to him and do not deviate from the general context of the state, and any violation he commits degrades him and affects his mission in society.