Apple AirTag: I Wasn’t Crazy, Someone Was Following Me

Apple air tag

“I was not crazy: someone was following me”

The iPhone maker is facing lawsuits from women who were harassed through the tiny tracking device.

Published

The gadget is the size of a coin and costs about thirty francs.

apple

Initially designed to locate the material goods of the holders of Apple products, the AirTag fuels the anger of women who at the end of 2022 began legal proceedings, still in progress, against the Cupertino company. Connected to an application to be downloaded on your smartphone, the AirTag then allows you to follow in real time the geographical position of the goods to which it is attached but also of the humans who transport it, sometimes without their knowledge.

This is the discovery made by Alison Carney, in June 2022. The professional singer recounts crossing the American city of Chicago in an SUV to reach the concert hall where she is expected, when she finds in her bag an AirTag which is not hers and which she says Apple never informed her of, by sending a notification to her iPhone, as it is normally required to do when an accessory of this type goes found nearby.

“I felt violated”

When she comes across the gadget, everything makes sense to the young artist. Since the end of a tumultuous love affair, she says she has received incessant calls and many messages from her ex-boyfriend, who even comes knocking on her door in the middle of the night when he does not burst into the restaurant where she dines. “When we found this AirTag, it became clear that I was not crazy. I knew someone was following me,” the young woman who lives in Washington told AFP. “I felt violated. I isolated myself. I stopped going out,” she says. “I know someone has the ability to place a device on my body, my possessions, and track me for the rest of my life. And (these accessories) are getting smaller and harder to detect,” she continues angrily.

serial business

The latest case dates back to February 5 in Irving, a small town north of Dallas, Texas. Robert Reeves, spokesman for the local police, told AFP that the city police station alone had already handled several cases involving the famous Apple accessory, in which the victim and his follower knew each other. . The procedure to follow after filing a complaint is to seek from Apple the identity of the owner of the account attached to the AirTag found, using the serial number, said Mr. Reeves. Information to which Alison Carney has never had access since she has not filed a complaint, for fear of reprisals.

Contacted by AFP, Apple referred to a press release published in February 2022 condemning “with the greatest firmness any malicious use” of its product and assured that updates promised in that declaration “had now entered into force”.

Ongoing proceedings

But it takes more to convince Jane Doe (pseudonym, editor’s note) and Lauren Hughes who filed a complaint against Apple in California. The first claims that after divorcing her ex-husband, he twice placed an AirTag in his child’s backpack. The second plaintiff found the object, colored with a marker and wrapped in a plastic bag, in a wheel arch of her car, according to a complaint filed on December 5.

(AFP)Show comments

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.