added: "The author should have returned to the family Ahmed Zaki; In order to help him and provide him with the information he needs so that the book appears well and befitting the status of the artist Ahmed Zaki, but he distorted it and distorted the image of his mother, using false information"as described.
Among those "Misinformation" What was mentioned in the book, as Mona says, is the author’s saying that the late artist’s mother had asked for a divorce, when in fact she did not do so and did not ask divorce Finally, her husband died. It is also false information that he (Zaki) refused to have his mother visit him to the hospital, which is not true.
illness "the emperor"
In this context, Mona revealed the fact that Ahmed Zaki’s mother did not visit him while he was in the hospital during his illness, explaining that he "In March 2005, one of the art magazines published on its cover the title: "Ahmed Zaki screams that he wants to see his mother"How is it possible to repeat that he refused to visit him?"
As for the story of his mother’s marriage, she said: "That was 70 years ago, a woman was married at the age of 13 and upon the death of Ahmed Zaki’s father, she had the right to remarry.. It is completely legal and not a defect or constitute any error.. At that time Zaki was raised with members of his family and obtained "technical DIPLOA" From Zagazig Governorate, this means that he did not live as an expatriate away from his family, or that his mother expelled him and adopted him by other people, as the writer also mentioned in his book".
black Tiger
On the other hand, the author, Mohamed Tawfiq, responded, in exclusive statements to the website "Sky News Arabia" On the controversy, saying that he did not in any way offend the artist Ahmed Zaki or his family, claiming that the family of the late artist did not read the same book (while his sister says that she read it and therefore moved against the writer in court).
He pointed out that the book talks about love "black Tiger"He did not speak of his mother; The book is far from biography and personal life.
He added: "The book talks about Ahmed Zaki in 1986, specifically about a movie "innocent"Through it, he talks about his artwork, but he did not address Ahmed Zaki’s life from birth until his death".
The author asked: "When you mentioned that Ahmed Zaki graduated from Sanayeh School, did that constitute an insult to him?"And he says that he mentioned in his book a text: "Ahmed’s sense of alienation continued to dominate him, but the confusion of pity in the eyes of those around him was increasing"What is wrong or wrong with that sentence?
Tawfiq indicated that he has not received any lawsuit so far, and he has not received any financial profits in exchange for the book, and that is the love of the artist Ahmed Zaki, as he said.
Innocent movie
And about his failure to return to the family of the artist Ahmed Zaki in order to obtain the information he wanted, the writer Mohamed Tawfiq explained that he "In the book, he did not mention his biography in order to return to them, but rather he talked about the film The Innocent, and the family of the late is unaware of any information about the work".
struggle for love "the emperor"
The author revealed that "In the process of filing a lawsuit against the sister of the artist Ahmed Zaki"accusing her of "defamation against him"as well as "Her insult to the artist Ahmed Zaki when she mentioned in one of the programs that Ahmed Zaki’s mother was a virtuous woman who refused to visit her son at home so as not to meet the artists, and thus she may have offended her brother and art.".
“>
The writer Mohamed Tawfiq published a book entitled “Ahmed Zaki 86”, which included stations from the “Black Panther” march. The late artist’s family considered him to be carrying abuse and false information, forcing them to file a lawsuit against the author.
Crisis details
Initially, the artist’s sister, Ahmed Zaki, Mona Abdel Ghani, said in statements to “Sky News Arabia”, that her brother is a big star who presented various works of art and is not supposed to be limited to offensive information such as that “his mother did not raise him and married after his father’s death. “.
She added, “The author should have returned to the family Ahmed Zaki; In order to help him and provide him with the information he needs in order for the book to appear well and befit the artist Ahmed Zaki, but he distorted it and distorted the image of his mother, using false information,” she described.
Among those “misinformation” contained in the book, as Mona says, is the author’s statement that the late artist’s mother had asked for a divorce, when in fact she did not do so and did not ask divorce Finally, her husband died. It is also false information that he (Zaki) refused to have his mother visit him to the hospital, which is not true.
“Emperor” disease
In this context, Mona revealed the fact that Ahmed Zaki’s mother did not visit him while he was in the hospital during his illness, explaining that “in March 2005, one of the art magazines published a title on its cover: “Ahmed Zaki screams that he (wants) to see his mother.” Saying that he refused to visit him?”
As for the story of his mother’s marriage, she said: “That was 70 years ago. A woman was married at the age of 13, and upon the death of Ahmed Zaki’s father, she had the right to marry again.. It is completely legal and not a defect or constitute any error.. At that time, Zaki was raised. With his family members and obtained a “Diploma of Crafts” from Zagazig Governorate, this means that he did not live as an expatriate away from his family, or that his mother expelled him and adopted him by other people, as the writer also mentioned in his book.
black Tiger
On the other hand, author Mohamed Tawfiq, in exclusive statements to Sky News Arabia, responded to the controversy, saying that he did not in any way offend the artist Ahmed Zaki or his family, claiming that the family of the late artist did not read the same book (while his sister says that she read it). That is why I took legal action against the writer.
He pointed out that the book talks about the love of the “Black Panther”, and did not talk about his mother; The book is far from biography and personal life.
He added: “The book talks about Ahmed Zaki in 1986, specifically about the movie “The Innocent”, and through it talks about his artwork, but it did not address Ahmed Zaki’s life from birth until his death.”
The author asked: “Did you mention that Ahmed Zaki graduated from Sanayeh School, did that constitute an insult to him?” He says that he mentioned in his book a text: “Ahmed’s sense of alienation continued to dominate him, and rather the confusion of pity in the eyes of those around him was increasing,” he wondered. What is wrong or offensive in that sentence.
Tawfiq indicated that he has not received any lawsuit so far, and he has not received any financial profits in exchange for the book, and that is the love of the artist Ahmed Zaki, as he said.
Innocent movie
And about his failure to return to the family of the artist Ahmed Zaki in order to obtain the information he wanted, the writer Mohamed Tawfik explained that “he did not mention in the book his biography in order to return to them, but rather he talked about the film The Innocent, and the family of the late is ignorant of any information about the work.”
Struggle for the love of the “Emperor”
The author revealed that he was “in the process of filing a lawsuit against the sister of the artist Ahmed Zaki,” accusing her of “defaming him”, as well as “offending the artist Ahmed Zaki when she mentioned in one of the programs that Ahmed Zaki’s mother was a virtuous woman who refused to visit her son at home so that she would not be interviewed.” female artists, and thus may have offended her brother and art.”