Covid-19 vaccines: neither "safe", nor "effective"

The natural protection after a primary infection proves to be as effective or even better than that of the vaccine.

For the past few weeks, the narrative of the coronavirus pandemic has been crumbling (read p. 15 to 17). A review of studies* from Australia, where 70% of the 26 million inhabitants were vaccinated with a double dose before Christmas 2021, made a sharp assessment from September 2022 with the official discourse. Selected pieces.

The truth is the daughter of time. This Italian saying, meaning that time brings the truth to light, suits all those who, from the start, have “nuanced” the Covid-19 pandemic. Of which this review, from the situation in Australia, where “ after millions of people have been vaccinated up to four times in one year (2021), the effects of these vaccines [à ARN messager] gradually become apparent “. Despite the early signals putting (big) dampers on the safety and effectiveness of the injections, the authors of the review of studies note that the Australian authorities persisted, in September 2022, in encouraging recalls and vaccination of pregnant women and children aged 5 to 11. And this, despite the absence of complete data, still not provided by the manufacturers. Their article sifts through some of the official arguments…

The mRNA remains localized at the injection site?

This was one of the main arguments at the start of the campaign: messenger RNA does not migrate in the body, especially not to the reproductive organs, so it could neither modify our genome nor be transmitted from one generation to another. Probably false assertions, as proven by autopsies that found that the vaccine was found in almost all organs, including the brainthe nanoparticles serving as a vehicle for the mRNA being able to cross the blood-brain barrier.

mRNA is rapidly degraded?

Another argument tending to reassure the population but now upset: the injected mRNA is unstable, therefore degraded and eliminated within a few hours to a few days. In reality, vaccines can persist for at least sixty days, and it is impossible to define for how long or in what quantity the Spike protein is actually produced, or what the biological consequences will be.

Read also
Covid: the official narrative attacked from all sides

The vaccine, better than natural immunity?

The US CDC (Centers for Disease Control) had suggested that unvaccinated people with recent Sars-CoV-2 infection had a five times higher risk of reinfection than vaccinated people. A message taken up by the media, with the slogan of “high and robust” protection. Since February 2023, it appears that the natural protection after a primary infection proves to be as effective or even better than that of the vaccine. This was also proven with Sars-CoV-1, which confers observable immunity seventeen years later. For the authors, a primary infection could therefore have been evidence of immunity, such as vaccination. This was never the case in Australia (or anywhere else).

What do mRNA vaccines really protect against?

It is now accepted that vaccination has protected neither transmission nor the risk of developing Covid-19, contrary to what has long been trumpeted. Stay the supposed protection against serious forms, that the latest work is very likely to invalidate as well. The authors of the article note that research is accumulating showing that mRNA vaccines, not only be neither safe nor effective, would even be dangerous : never in history have we seen 1,011 studies – to date – devoted to the side effects of a vaccine (circulation, vision, neurological, menstrual disorders, as well as cancers, myocarditis, etc.). And this may just be the beginning.

Bibliographic references

Under no circumstances is the information and advice offered on the Alternative Santé site likely to replace a consultation or a diagnosis formulated by a doctor or a health professional, who are the only ones able to adequately assess your state of health.