Devolo BE9300 Mesh: Coverage Trumps Theoretical Speed in Home Wi-Fi 7 Test
Despite boasting a theoretical maximum throughput of 9,300 Mbit/s, the real-world value of the Devolo BE9300 Wi-Fi 7 Mesh kit lies not in boosting internet speeds but in eliminating dead zones, according to a review by Mathieu Tamigniau. The kit provided uninterrupted coverage from a basement to the first floor, supporting 32 connected devices without issue, an improvement over the previous system.
The Reality of 9,300 Mbit/s vs. a 100 Mbit/s Internet Line
The Devolo BE9300 Mesh kit makes a powerful impression on paper. Its spec sheet highlights Wi-Fi 7, three frequency bands, and a combined theoretical throughput of approximately 9,300 Mbit/s. The reviewer, Mathieu Tamigniau, notes a critical detail: this figure is an aggregate of all bands and cannot be achieved by a single device. The three-unit kit tested is priced at 699 euros, which amounts to about 233 euros per unit.
This raw power becomes immediately contextualized by the reviewer’s own internet connection, a Proximus line capped at 100 Mbit/s. The stark reality is that no Wi-Fi router, no matter how advanced, can make a 100 Mbit/s connection faster. The fundamental bottleneck lies outside the home network. The true benefit of a high-performance system like the BE9300 is not speeding up the internet pipe, but ensuring the full capacity of that pipe reaches every corner of the house without degradation.
From Basement to First Floor: The Coverage Contract Fulfilled
The primary test objective for the BE9300 was not to reinvent the mesh concept but to deliver consistent, usable Wi-Fi throughout a multi-story home. The reviewer had previously tested the Devolo BE6500, making this a direct evaluation of the higher-tier model’s performance in a real-world environment. The result was a convincing success.
https://t.co/Ed2URyCwjG On n'a jamais assez d'ondes toxiques. Passons à travers les murs.
With three nodes installed, the BE9300 provided excellent coverage across the entire residence, from the basement to the first floor. It supported all 32 connected devices—from smart lightbulbs and washing machines to televisions and computers—without a hitch, including outdoor cameras. This marked a significant improvement over a previous two-unit Netgear Orbi system running on Wi-Fi 6, which had created persistent “white zones” with poor connectivity.
Is This Level of Power Truly Necessary?
The review’s most significant finding is that the BE9300’s main benefit is its coverage, far more than its headline-grabbing maximum speed. It effectively solves the problem of having a strong connection where it’s needed, a practical triumph over marketing specifications.
This raises the question of whether the high-end BE9300 is indispensable for this comfort. The reviewer points out that the BE6500 is also a Wi-Fi 7 system with a 2.5 Gbit/s Ethernet port. The BE9300’s key differentiator is its tri-band architecture, but this technical upgrade does not automatically translate into a perceptible improvement in every home. The value is highly dependent on the specific layout and connectivity challenges of the residence.
The Migration Challenge of Changing Home Wi-Fi
Switching to a new Wi-Fi system, particularly one that requires a new network name and password, proved to be a time-consuming endeavor. In a connected home with dozens of devices, the migration extends far beyond simply reconnecting a phone and a laptop. The reviewer spent hours re-linking equipment, reconfiguring parts of the Google home, and generally resetting the smart home setup.
This laborious process should not be mistaken for a flaw in the Devolo kit itself, which is described as “plug & play” and easy to install even without an application. A potential workaround, however, is to use the same Wi-Fi name and password as the previous network, which might prevent some of the reconfiguration headaches.
An App Experience That Leaves Room for Improvement
The primary weakness identified in the user experience was the companion application. The reviewer found it to be “not very ergonomic” and noted that the settings were “capricious” when configured through the app. While this didn’t impede the basic functionality of the network, it did hinder more advanced configuration attempts.
At this price point, users can reasonably expect an app interface that is as reliable and reassuring as the network’s day-to-day performance. The current offering, according to the test, falls short of that expectation, presenting an opportunity for improvement in future software updates.
