The invocation of the law encouraged some people to leave [les lieux] and allowed the forces of order to put an end to these occupations
then explained the Prime Minister.
Five hours later, another occupation began, this one much bloodier: Vladimir Putin launched his troops to attack Ukraine. War was back in Europe.
Behind the scenes, several Liberals believe that the Russian invasion and, above all, the Canadian response coordinated with that of the allies allowed Justin Trudeau to regain his stature as a statesman.
The challenge for truckers, it’s completely disappeared from radar screens
says a liberal source, who believes that for many people
the war in Ukraine has put things into perspective
among others on what it meant, to defend freedom
.
A poll conducted by the firm Research Co. at the end of February shows that 52% of Canadians polled approve of the Prime Minister’s response to the Ukraine file.
Even those generally critical of Justin Trudeau’s foreign policy acknowledge that his government has done the right thing so far.
I think the Canadian government has lived up to what was asked by the allies
, launches Jocelyn Coulon, on the phone. The former adviser to ex-Minister of Foreign Affairs Stéphane Dion had published in 2018 A selfie with Justin Trudeaua work in which he reproached the Prime Minister for his lack of ambition on the diplomatic front.
Mr. Coulon also compliments the new Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mélanie Joly, who had the your just
in the last few weeks: We can see that she has gained confidence in matters of foreign policy.
The work of the Deputy Prime Minister was also noticed. A government source also confirms that Chrystia Freeland played a key role in the discussions with Western allies, which led to the imposition of sanctions against the Russian Central Bank.
Talk to opponents
However, if Canada has committed a without fail
so far, his answer is not sufficient, believes Jocelyn Coulon. As he already did in his book, the former adviser criticizes the Trudeau government for not having entered into a direct dialogue with Russia.
For example, there has been no bilateral meeting between Vladimir Putin and Justin Trudeau since the latter’s election in 2015. However, in recent years, all the other G7 leaders have met with the President. Russians, often repeatedly, despite their disapproval of the 2014 invasion of Crimea.
We must always talk not only to our friends, but also to our adversaries, adds Jocelyn Coulon. This is where diplomacy comes into its own.
Professor Justin Massie, international security expert at the University of Quebec in Montreal, agrees: It’s important to dialogue even with your enemies, even when you’re in conflict.
He cites as an example the approach of France in the last days, which distinguished herself by her diplomacy
to try to organize a humanitarian corridor to get people out of Kyiv
.
Of course, Mr. Massie acknowledges, diplomacy has its limits. Vladimir Putin, despite all pressure from the allies, has shown no sign of backing down and is shamelessly continuing his bombardment of Ukrainian cities. However, according to the political scientist, it is necessary to keep the dialogue open, if only to try to alleviate the situation for the civilian population
.
However, in Canada, he adds, we don’t like to seem like we’re talking to [nos] rivals because we are accused of complacency by our political opponents, who use foreign policy for partisan purposes. And that’s unfortunate.
Justin Massie laments, among other things, the fact that the Conservatives have called for the expulsion of the Russian ambassador in Ottawa – a very bad idea, he said: Even the United States has direct and privileged relations with Russia to avoid interpretations or miscalculations that could, perhaps, lead to a military escalation.
The presence of a large Ukrainian community in Canada – the third in the world – and what Jocelyn Coulon calls the very significant influence of the Ukrainian lobby within the Trudeau government
also contributed, according to the former adviser, to a lack of communication with the Russian giant.
Little success in foreign affairs
Although Justin Trudeau will only meet with allies during this trip to Europe, Justin Massie recognizes that the federal government has well managed
so far the Ukrainian file, especially in comparison with some misfires
engaged in foreign policy.
The political scientist cites the trip to India as an example, but also the 200 blue helmets that Canada never deployed as planned, the withdrawal of its troops from Mali before the date requested by the
HIM-HER-ITor the Liberal government’s failure to secure a seat on the United Nations Security Council.ALENA 2.0, the new trade agreement with the United States signed under Donald Trump”,”text”:”Justin Trudeau’s foreign policy has not had much success, apart from negotiating NAFTA 2.0, the new trade agreement with the United States signed under Donald Trump”}}”>Justin Trudeau’s foreign policy hasn’t had much success, aside from negotiating the ALENA 2.0, the new trade agreement with the United States signed under Donald Trump
says Mr. Massie.
The expectations in this conflict were therefore quite low
according to the international security expert, even more so after the trucking crisis that paralyzed downtown Ottawa, where we saw a Prime Minister rather absent
in the first weeks of the conflict.
There, he concludes, we feel that Justin Trudeau is no longer present
and that his government increase the announcements
. The image of inaction that sometimes sticks to the Prime Minister’s skin therefore seems more difficult, until now, to affix to his response to the Ukrainian conflict.