Lindsay Clancy will face a potential second trial for the 2023 strangulation deaths of her three young children after a Massachusetts judge rejected her defense team’s motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds, cbc.ca reported.
Judge William Sullivan issued his ruling in Plymouth, Massachusetts, clearing the path for prosecutors to try Clancy again. Sullivan acted after declaring a mistrial on Sept. 4 when a holdout juror prevented a unanimous verdict.
Defense lawyers argued that a second trial violates constitutional protections against double jeopardy. They contended the judge acted prematurely and should have questioned the holdout juror instead of declaring a mistrial.
Sullivan disagreed, writing that questioning the juror during deliberations would have been impermissibly coercive. He stated that a manifest necessity justified the mistrial, according to cbc.ca.
“Because the court concludes that there was a manifest necessity for a retrial based on the jury's deadlock, a retrial on the murder indictments does not violate Clancy's right not to be placed in double jeopardy,” Sullivan wrote.
The court scheduled a November 16 hearing to discuss scheduling, with Sullivan leaning toward a March trial date. CNN reported that the Plymouth County District Attorney’s Office has not definitively committed to retrying Clancy.

Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague stated that Clancy will likely stand trial again, but the state has not yet decided what charges she will face. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington criticized the prosecution for keeping his client uncertain about the specific charges.
| Event / Date | Details | Source |
|---|---|---|
| January 24, 2023 | Three children killed in Duxbury home; Clancy attempts suicide. | cbc.ca |
| September 4, 2026 | Mistrial declared following a hung jury. | cbc.ca |
| November 9, 2026 | Judge Sullivan denies the motion to dismiss the case. | The Guardian |
| November 16, 2026 | Upcoming hearing to discuss the second trial schedule. | cbc.ca |
During the initial trial, no one disputed that Clancy strangled 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson, and 8-month-old Callan using exercise bands in their Duxbury home. She then jumped from a second-story window, resulting in her paralysis.
Her defense argued she suffered from postpartum psychosis and lacked criminal responsibility. Several jurors later stated in televised interviews that they were prepared to find her not guilty by reason of insanity before the deadlock occurred, as reported by The Guardian.
Martin Weinberg, a lawyer for Clancy, stated that the defense anticipates pursuing an appeal. Meanwhile, the legal teams will return to court on November 16 to discuss when to hold that trial.