There, a German inventor advocated including his technology, which was intended to improve signaling protocols, in the standard. But he didn’t mention that Panasonic had filed a patent on this technology just three days earlier, naming him as the inventor. It is highly unlikely that he was not informed about the patent application. If the German had disclosed this patent application to the standardization committee, according to its statutes, this should have given priority to one of the alternative, unpatented solutions, say standardization experts. In this respect, the entire lawsuit by the rights administrator IP Bridge in Munich, who wants to sue for fees for the use of this patent, has feet of clay.
Related posts:
Three times more complaints filed in 2022 with the Energy Mediation Service
What is the real price of the Egyptian pound?
Anesthesia Depth Monitor Market Value and Volume with Status and Prospect 2022 to 2028 – Jeunes Expr...
Oil pushes most Gulf markets higher
Fed analyzes interest rate increase of up to 100 points – El Financiero
Powerlong Real Estate: 2021 contracted sales of 101.227 billion yuan increased by about 24.1% year-o...
Swiss Loto Archives: No Millionaire Saturday Evening Results
Discover this ultra simple trick to recognize a mobile radar car for sure!