Colombian singer Marbelle ignited a fierce digital controversy on September 6, 2026, by directing a crude, personal attack at opposition congresswoman Deicy Alejandra Omaña Ortiz—widely known as Amaranta Hank—after the senator criticized the government’s security strategy following a deadly car bomb attack in Los Patios, Norte de Santander.
The Bottom Line
- The Catalyst: Senator Alejandra Omaña criticized the government’s security response following a lethal car bomb attack on August 31, 2026, in Los Patios, which left one dead and 15 injured.
- The Retaliation: Singer Marbelle responded on the social network X with a derogatory seven-word remark targeting the congresswoman’s former career in the adult entertainment industry.
- The Counter-Attack: Rather than engaging directly, Omaña amplified a viral video by influencer Kamelia Zuluaga, which shifted focus onto Marbelle’s personal history and the criminal convictions of her husband, Royne Chávez.
From National Tragedy to Personal Mudslinging on Social Media
When a violent escalation hits headlines, public figures often find themselves at the center of the cultural fallout. Late in the week, pop singer Marbelle—born Maureen Belky Ramírez Gómez—found herself drowning in backlash after trading policy debate for personal vitriol. According to local reporting, the friction began when Senator Alejandra Omaña took to public platforms to condemn the August 31 car bomb attack against a police station in Los Patios, an area within the Cúcuta metropolitan zone.
The attack claimed one life, injured 15 people, and battered local infrastructure. With her voice trembling during legislative statements, the Pacto Histórico senator argued that the state must step up protection for citizens and the National Police force instead of allowing violence to become the grim normal of the region. Rather than addressing the substance of the senator’s security critique, Marbelle opted for a caustic jab on X, writing, “La cogían entre 5 y no lloraba!”—a direct reference to Omaña’s past as an adult film actress before entering politics.
Here is the kicker: instead of closing down the conversation, the dismissive remark acted as gasoline on an already volatile public square. Followers quickly splintered into factions. Supporters of the popular singer cheered the provocative internet jab, while critics accused Marbelle of deflecting attention away from a genuine national security crisis and reducing a serious legislative debate to misogynistic shaming.
The Counter-Offensive and the Return of Historical Scandals
Public clashes rarely stay contained in a single post. While Senator Omaña did not initially fire back directly on her own personal feeds, she orchestrated a strategic repost of a detailed investigative breakdown by influencer Kamelia Zuluaga. The shared clip forcefully turned the spotlight right back onto Marbelle’s own household history.

According to the commentary shared by Omaña, critics pointed out a glaring hypocrisy in attacking a woman’s consensual career choices while ignoring judicial records closer to home. The video reminded audiences of Royne Chávez, Marbelle’s husband and former security chief for Andrés Pastrana. Chávez faced high-profile legal trouble, including a 2005 conviction for illicit enrichment that landed him behind bars for 42 months, alongside subsequent legal battles over document forgery and false testimony regarding unexplained assets.
| Figure | Public Domain Focus | Key Controversies Sourced |
|---|---|---|
| Deicy Alejandra Omaña Ortiz (Amaranta Hank) | Senator (Pacto Histórico) | Targeted by online remarks referencing her past career in the adult entertainment industry following security critiques in Los Patios. |
| Marbelle (Maureen Belky Ramírez Gómez) | Popular Singer / Public Personality | Faced heavy criticism for social media remarks directed at Senator Omaña, prompting counter-exposures regarding her family history. |
| Royne Chávez | Former Security Chief / Husband | Convicted in 2005 for illicit enrichment, document forgery, and false testimony regarding state asset discrepancies. |
The shared digital content did not stop at financial crimes. It further dredged up archived tabloid history concerning past relationships during Chávez’s incarceration, compounding the cultural friction between the celebrity and the politician. By amplifying the clip, Omaña publicly thanked the creator, writing simply, “Gracias por tu apoyo,” while Marbelle remained silent in the immediate aftermath of the digital counter-offensive.
Cultural Polarization and the Limits of Public Discourse
This fiery exchange lays bare the increasingly toxic nature of modern political commentary across Latin America. When high-profile artists choose to weaponize a public figure’s past instead of engaging with policy failures—such as the deadly violence unfolding in Norte de Santander—the dialogue descends into pure spectacle. But as the swift pivot to Royne Chávez’s criminal history proves, attempting to discredit an opponent via personal history is a double-edged sword in the digital age.
As the noise settles, the fundamental issues—protecting civilians from insurgent violence and holding public figures accountable for their rhetoric—remain entirely unresolved. What are your thoughts on how celebrity culture intersects with legislative debates? Drop a comment below and join the conversation.