NZ Rugby files High Court injunction over PNG Chiefs name

New Zealand Rugby (NZR) has officially filed for an interim and final injunction in the High Court to prevent the Australian Rugby League Commission (ARLC) from using the “Chiefs” name for its new Papua New Guinea-based NRL expansion franchise. The legal action aims to protect a brand trademarked by NZR since 1998.

IP Australia Issues Adverse Reports on NRL Trademark

  • Regulatory Friction: IP Australia has already issued multiple adverse reports regarding the NRL’s trademark application, signaling that the ARLC faces a steep uphill battle in court.

The Legal Firewall: Why NZR is Seeking Injunctive Relief

The dispute centers on the protection of intellectual property that NZR claims has been cultivated for three decades. According to NZR CEO Steve Lancaster, the organisation has a fundamental responsibility to protect the Chiefs brand, which serves as a cornerstone of their Super Rugby identity. NZR maintains that it has attempted to engage the ARLC constructively since the name was confirmed in October 2025, but those negotiations have stalled, leaving litigation as the only remaining pathway to prevent brand damage.

Chiefs CEO Simon Graafhuis echoed these sentiments, emphasizing that the issue is not opposition to the growth of rugby league in the Pacific, but rather the inevitability of confusion in a shared market. “Teams in different sports and markets can exist alongside one another with the same name, but the issue here is the similarity of our sports competing in the same market, for the same fans, in overlapping windows,” Graafhuis noted. The argument is supported by findings from IP Australia, which warned of a “real and tangible danger of confusion” regarding the ARLC’s attempt to secure trademark rights for the PNG Chiefs.

The NRL and New Zealand Rugby are set to battle over the right of the Chiefs name. Photos / Getty Images, Photosport
Photo: NZ Herald

V’landys Hits Back: Accusations of Hypocrisy

ARLC Executive Chairman Peter V’landys has responded with a combative stance, characterizing the legal challenge as "mind-blowing hypocrisy." V’landys pointed to historical precedents in rugby, specifically citing the 1996 entry of the Auckland Blues into Super Rugby, which occurred without consultation or approval from the established New South Wales Blues team that had operated for over five decades.

“We will defend this vigorously,” V’landys said in a statement. He further suggested that the legal maneuver is a defensive reaction from the rugby union establishment, which he claims is feeling threatened by the rising popularity and sell-out crowds currently enjoyed by rugby league in New Zealand. The ARLC remains committed to the expansion side, which is backed by a substantial $600 million Australian government funding package intended to bolster the sport’s presence in the Pacific region.

PNG Chiefs CEO Responds After New Zealand SUES PNG Over Name! | Launch Still On!

NRL Faces Pressure Before October Brand Launch

The timing of the High Court action is critical. With the official brand launch slated for October 21, the NRL is under immense pressure to either secure a legal victory or pivot to a new identity.

Feature New Zealand Rugby (Chiefs) ARLC (PNG Chiefs)
Trademark Status Held since 1998 (NZ & Australia) Application subject to adverse reports
Market Position Established 1996 Inaugural season: 2028
Primary Argument Brand confusion in shared market Precedent of name reuse in rugby codes
Legal Goal Interim & Final Injunction Defend trademark rights

The Path Forward for the 19th Franchise

As the legal proceedings progress, the outcome will determine the future of the NRL’s 19th franchise. The $600 million investment in PNG rugby league is designed to create a long-term professional pathway for local talent, but the current trademark impasse complicates the franchise’s identity. While the ARLC appears confident in its legal position, the risk of a court-mandated name change just days before a major media launch poses a substantial logistical hurdle.

NZ Rugby files High Court injunction over PNG Chiefs name
Photo: Nine.com.au

For now, the standoff represents a clash between established brand protection and the rapid, government-backed expansion of the NRL. With both parties digging in, the focus shifts to the High Court, where the interpretation of “significant confusion” within the trans-Tasman sports market will likely determine the name of the new PNG franchise when it officially takes the field in 2028.

Photo of author

Luis Mendoza - Sport Editor

Senior Editor, Sport Luis is a respected sports journalist with several national writing awards. He covers major leagues, global tournaments, and athlete profiles, blending analysis with captivating storytelling.

BBC Unveils First-Look at Julia Donaldson Christmas Animation ‘The Baddies

Value-Based Messaging Increases Vaccine Openness by Up to 16 Percentage Points