2024-03-22 19:29:59
Judge Laura Pérez had not finished speaking, after three hours of reading the sentence, when prosecutor Gastón Britos Rubiolo asked to speak to request precautionary measures against the four convicted of the million-dollar Ipross scam.
That speed responded to a specific doubt that exists within the Public Ministry team led by Chief Prosecutor Teresa Giuffrida and also included by Marcelo Ramos: How to prevent pharmacists from absconding?
“The danger of flight has increased, they have the resources to evade justice,” Britos Rubiolo said, to justify the request that the precautionary measures imposed during the initial part of the process be maintained for all the accused.
These guidelines defined by the Rio Negro Justice are four and The main one is the prohibition of leaving the country.
Secondly, the demand for Fabio Caffaratti, Rodolfo Mastandrea and Raúl Mascaró is appear every 14 days at the prosecutor’s office headquartersto prove that they maintain a residence in Roca.
For health reasons, Sandra Fasano is allowed to make a telephone communication from Allen, with the same purpose of notifying that she remains in her home.
The other two precautionary measures that weigh on pharmacists have to do with their assets and consist of the general inhibition of assets and the seizure of money of the last item that Ipross deposited within the framework of the scam but that the defendants were not able to collect due to the blockade imposed by the judicial investigation.
The reaction of the defender of pharmacists
“Danger of escape? Without having items for five years? “It is an extreme persecution of the Judiciary towards the defendants,” lawyer Patricia Espeche complained during her proposal to reject the continuity of the precautionary measures.
For the lawyer, the prosecutors “have not given grounds or reasons” to prove the reasonableness of maintaining these demands, also remembering that “My assistants have always been right.”
“There is ample evidence that they have always been correct,” insisted Espeche, who in his first intervention advanced with a description of the ruling, saying that it was “unmotivated”, “unfounded” and “incoherent”.
After a brief deliberation, the judges decided to accept the request of the prosecution – which had been supported by the complaint – considering that “These precautionary measures participate in the general principles of any precautionary measures in the criminal system.”
1711136553
#Prosecutors #convictions #danger #flight #increased