The burgeoning world of artificial intelligence-generated video is facing its first major Hollywood showdown. Seedance 2.0, a latest AI video generator developed by ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, has quickly drawn the ire of major studios due to concerns over potential copyright infringement. The platform’s ability to create ultra-realistic videos from text prompts, including depictions resembling recognizable celebrities, has sparked a swift response from industry leaders.
Seedance 2.0’s appeal lies in its accessibility and the quality of its output. Users can generate videos featuring convincingly realistic people and scenarios simply by typing in a description. However, this ease of use has raised significant questions about intellectual property rights, particularly as viral videos surfaced online featuring likenesses of prominent figures like Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt in fabricated scenarios, including one depicting them discussing the Jeffrey Epstein case, as reported by Business Insider.
ByteDance has responded to the growing criticism, stating it will implement additional safeguards to prevent unauthorized use of copyrighted material. “ByteDance respects intellectual property rights and we have heard the concerns regarding Seedance 2.0,” a spokesperson said in a statement, as CNBC reported on February 16, 2026. “We are taking steps to strengthen existing protections to prevent the unauthorized use of intellectual property and likeness by users.”
The response follows a strong warning from the Motion Picture Association (MPA), which represents major Hollywood studios including Netflix, Disney, Sony, Universal, and Warner Bros. Discovery. The MPA publicly called on ByteDance to cease what it termed “activities infringing copyright,” according to NBC News. Disney also sent a direct warning letter to ByteDance, alleging the distribution and reproduction of its intellectual property through the AI tool without permission.
Disney’s letter specifically accused ByteDance of equipping Seedance with a library of copyrighted characters obtained illegally, presenting them as if they were in the public domain. Paramount Skydance, also a member of the MPA, issued a similar warning. This coordinated action underscores the seriousness with which Hollywood is approaching the potential threat posed by AI-powered video generation.
The situation highlights the complex legal and ethical challenges presented by rapidly advancing AI technology. While AI video generators offer exciting creative possibilities, they also raise concerns about the protection of intellectual property and the potential for misuse. The outcome of this dispute could set a significant precedent for the regulation of AI-generated content and the balance between innovation and copyright law.
It remains to be seen how ByteDance will refine Seedance 2.0’s safeguards and whether these measures will satisfy Hollywood’s concerns. The industry will be closely watching to observe if similar actions will be taken against other AI video generation platforms. The ongoing dialogue between technology companies and content creators will be crucial in shaping the future of AI and its role in the entertainment landscape.
What are your thoughts on the use of AI in video creation? Share your opinions in the comments below.