Home » Council » Page 2

“`html


Ancient Rock Becomes Symbol of hospitality in Ha’il Council

A remarkable tradition unfolds in Baqaa.

A compelling video has surfaced, documenting a striking landmark within a citizen’s council in the Baqaa governorate of Ha’il. The footage captures a large, unadorned rock that holds deep historical and cultural significance for the local community.

The owner of the council explained that the rock is known as Al-Safat. He described it as a historical symbol that embodies the essence of the Baqaa people. He proudly stated, “We are the people of Al-Baqa, the people of Safat are told.”

historically, Al-Safat served as a focal point for hospitality and the welcoming of guests. This tradition has been passed down through generations within the family that established the council.

The council’s roots trace back approximately 150 years,founded by the current

What historical factors led to the adoption of a rock as a central meeting place in Baqa’a?

A Rock Facilitates a Meeting in Baqa’a, Hail: An Unusual Gathering Place

The Meaning of Baqa’a, Hail Region

Baqa’a, a historical town in the Hail region of Saudi Arabia, is known for its traditional mud-brick architecture and rich cultural heritage. The area’s landscape, characterized by rocky terrain and open spaces, often dictates unique solutions for everyday life. This includes, surprisingly, utilizing a large rock as a central meeting point for community discussions and decision-making. This practise isn’t merely anecdotal; it’s deeply rooted in the region’s history and social structure. Understanding the Hail region’s history is crucial to appreciating this tradition.

The Rock as a Traditional “Majlis”

For generations, a specific, large rock formation near the old settlement of Baqa’a has served as an informal majlis – a traditional Arabic gathering place. Unlike a formal building, this natural structure offers several advantages:

Neutral Ground: The rock provides a neutral space, free from the perceived biases associated with hosting meetings in a family home. This fosters more open and honest dialogue.

Accessibility: historically, before modern infrastructure, the rock was a readily accessible landmark for people traveling from surrounding villages.Baqa’a village life revolved around such central points.

Symbolism: The rock itself represents permanence and stability, qualities valued in community decision-making. It’s a tangible link to the past and a symbol of enduring traditions.

Open-Air Setting: The open-air environment encourages inclusivity and allows for a larger number of participants.

Types of Meetings Held at the Rock

The types of discussions held at this unique meeting place in Hail are diverse, reflecting the needs of the community:

  1. Dispute resolution: Traditionally, tribal elders would gather at the rock to mediate disputes between families or individuals. The setting’s neutrality helped ensure fair hearings.
  2. Community Announcements: Important announcements regarding harvests, seasonal migrations, or security concerns were often made at the rock, ensuring widespread dissemination of facts.
  3. Social Gatherings: Beyond formal meetings, the rock served as a place for socializing, sharing news, and strengthening community bonds.
  4. Planning & Coordination: Discussions about irrigation systems, land use, and collective projects were frequently held at the rock, leveraging the collective wisdom of the community.

The Role of Elders and Social Hierarchy

The meetings weren’t unstructured free-for-alls. A clear social hierarchy dictated the proceedings. Tribal leaders in Hail and respected elders played a crucial role in:

Facilitating Discussions: Elders guided the conversation, ensuring everyone had a chance to speak and preventing arguments from escalating.

Enforcing Decisions: Once a consensus was reached, the elders were responsible for ensuring the decision was implemented and respected.

Maintaining Tradition: They were the custodians of the tradition, passing down the knowledge and importance of the rock as a meeting place to future generations.

Modern Adaptations and Preservation Efforts

While modern infrastructure and governance structures have changed the landscape of Baqa’a, the tradition of meeting at the rock hasn’t entirely disappeared.

Continued Use for Informal Gatherings: locals still occasionally use the rock for informal gatherings and social events.

Tourism & Cultural Heritage: Recognizing its cultural significance, local authorities are exploring ways to preserve the rock and promote it as a cultural tourism destination in Hail.

Documenting oral Histories: Efforts are underway to document the oral histories associated with the rock,ensuring the stories and traditions are not lost. Hail region tourism benefits from showcasing such unique cultural assets.

Benefits of This Traditional Practice

The practice of using a rock as a meeting place offers several benefits, even in a modern context:

Promotes Inclusivity: the open and accessible nature of the setting encourages participation from all members of the community.

Fosters Dialogue: The neutral ground facilitates more open and honest dialogue.

Strengthens Community Bonds: Shared experiences and collective decision-making build stronger relationships.

Preserves Cultural Heritage: Maintaining this tradition helps preserve the unique cultural identity of Baqa’a and the Hail region.

Practical Tips for Visitors

If you plan to visit Baqa’a and the rock:

Respect Local Customs: dress modestly and be mindful of local traditions.

Engage with Locals: talk to residents and learn about the history of the rock from their viewpoint.

Support Local Businesses: Contribute to the local economy by purchasing souvenirs or dining at local restaurants.

Learn Basic Arabic Phrases: Knowing a few basic Arabic phrases will enhance your interactions with locals.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

The Rise of ‘Trash Tech’: How New Laws & Data Are Finally Tackling Illegal Dumping

Imagine a future where a discarded coffee cup isn’t just litter, but a digital fingerprint leading straight back to its thrower. It sounds like science fiction, but it’s becoming increasingly realistic. New Zealand is on the cusp of a significant shift in how it combats illegal dumping, moving beyond relying on chance sightings and overwhelmed councils to a system leveraging technology and data to hold offenders accountable. For decades, councils have struggled with the frustrating reality that “even CCTV footage is not enough,” as Hastings District Council’s manager of waste, Jacqui Schollum, recently stated. But a proposed new law, the Responsibility for Reducing Waste Act, promises to change that – and it’s a trend with implications far beyond New Zealand’s shores.

From 1970s Laws to 21st-Century Solutions

The current legal framework for dealing with illegal dumping is woefully outdated. Existing legislation, largely based on the Litter Act 1979 and the Waste Minimisation Act 2008, was created long before the explosion of single-use plastics and the convenience-driven culture that fuels much of today’s waste. Councils are often hampered by limited resources and the sheer scale of the problem. Hastings District Council, for example, manages over 5200km of roads, much of which falls under the jurisdiction of NZTA, preventing council clean-up crews from accessing the worst affected areas. This leaves communities frustrated and ratepayers footing the bill.

The proposed Responsibility for Reducing Waste Act aims to address these shortcomings by empowering litter control officers to issue fines based on vehicle registration and ownership details found *within* the rubbish itself. This represents a fundamental shift – from proving *who* dumped the waste to tracing it back through the waste stream.

The Power of ‘Trash Tech’ – Beyond Registration Details

While linking rubbish to vehicle owners is a significant step, the future of tackling illegal dumping extends far beyond this. We’re likely to see the integration of several “trash tech” solutions:

Smart Bins & Sensor Networks

Imagine bins equipped with sensors that not only monitor fill levels but also detect the type of waste deposited. This data could be used to identify hotspots for illegal dumping and even track the origin of specific waste streams. Several cities globally are already piloting smart bin technology, demonstrating its potential for optimizing waste collection and reducing contamination.

AI-Powered CCTV Analysis

Advances in artificial intelligence are making CCTV footage far more valuable. AI algorithms can now automatically detect instances of illegal dumping, identify vehicle types, and even potentially recognize license plates with greater accuracy than human observers. This technology can significantly reduce the reliance on manual monitoring and improve response times.

Blockchain for Waste Tracking

Blockchain technology, known for its security and transparency, could be used to create a digital record of waste from its point of origin to its final disposal. This would make it easier to track down illegal dumpers and ensure that waste is handled responsibly. While still in its early stages, blockchain-based waste tracking systems are gaining traction in some European countries.

The Environmental & Economic Costs of Inaction

The consequences of unchecked illegal dumping are far-reaching. Beyond the obvious aesthetic blight, it poses significant environmental risks, contaminating soil and waterways, harming wildlife, and contributing to greenhouse gas emissions. The economic costs are also substantial, including clean-up expenses, lost tourism revenue, and potential health impacts. According to a 2022 report by Keep New Zealand Beautiful, the cost of litter to New Zealand is estimated to be over $1 billion annually.

The proposed tiered penalty system under the Responsibility for Reducing Waste Act is a crucial step towards internalizing these costs. By making polluters financially responsible for the damage they cause, it incentivizes responsible waste disposal and discourages illegal dumping.

Challenges & Considerations

Implementing these changes won’t be without its challenges. Privacy concerns surrounding the collection and use of data from waste streams will need to be carefully addressed. Ensuring equitable enforcement, particularly in marginalized communities, is also critical. Furthermore, the success of the new legislation will depend on adequate funding for enforcement and public awareness campaigns.

The Role of Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)

Alongside stricter enforcement, a broader shift towards Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes is essential. EPR places the responsibility for the end-of-life management of products on the producers themselves, incentivizing them to design products that are more durable, recyclable, and less likely to end up as illegal waste. New Zealand is already exploring EPR schemes for several product categories, including packaging and tires.

Looking Ahead: A Future of Data-Driven Waste Management

The changes underway in New Zealand represent a broader global trend towards data-driven waste management. As technology continues to advance and public awareness of environmental issues grows, we can expect to see even more innovative solutions emerge. From drone-based litter detection to AI-powered recycling robots, the future of waste management is likely to be far more sophisticated – and effective – than anything we’ve seen before. The key will be to embrace these technologies responsibly, ensuring that they are used to protect the environment and promote a more sustainable future.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How will the new Responsibility for Reducing Waste Act affect me as a ratepayer?

A: The Act aims to reduce the financial burden on ratepayers by making illegal dumpers responsible for clean-up costs and environmental damage. This should lead to lower waste management expenses in the long run.

Q: What if I accidentally lose an item from my vehicle?

A: The legislation is intended to target deliberate illegal dumping, not accidental loss of items. Councils are expected to exercise discretion and consider the circumstances of each case.

Q: Will this new law lead to increased surveillance?

A: While the Act utilizes data from waste streams, it’s not intended to be a widespread surveillance program. Privacy considerations will be paramount in the implementation of the legislation.

Q: Where can I find more information about the Responsibility for Reducing Waste Act?

A: You can find more information on the Ministry for the Environment’s website: https://environment.govt.nz/

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Philippine vice President Excluded from National Security Council

in a move that has sparked debate, the Philippine Vice President was recently removed from the National Security Council (NSC).The decision, criticized by some as politically motivated, has raised questions about the balance of power within the Philippine goverment. While the specific reasons behind the Vice President’s exclusion remain unclear, the NSC’s mandate to advise the President on matters of national security underscores its significance. The Vice President, who previously served on the NSC, played a role in discussions on critical issues. The removal could possibly impact the Vice President’s ability to influence national security policies.

Tensions Rise as Marcos Removes Duterte from National Security Council

A power shift has taken place in the Philippines as President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has made a decisive move to restructure the country’s National Security Council (NSC). In a move widely seen as a public display of tension, Marcos has removed Vice President Sara Duterte from her position on the council. This decision comes on the heels of reports circulating about a falling out between the two leaders last year. The removal of Duterte from the NSC, a key body advising on national security matters, signals a potential deepening of the rift between the President and Vice President. The full implications of this decision and its impact on the political landscape of the Philippines remain to be seen. Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has announced a major shakeup of the country’s National Security council (NSC), aiming to strengthen its focus on safeguarding national interests. Marcos emphasized the importance of having council members deeply committed to protecting the nation’s security and sovereignty. The reorganization, he stated, was “necessary to ensure that its council members uphold and protect national security and sovereignty.” This significant move is expected to have a ripple effect on the political landscape of the Philippines, potentially reshaping alliances and influencing policy decisions related to national defense and international relations. Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has announced a major shakeup of the country’s National Security Council (NSC), aiming to strengthen its focus on safeguarding national interests. Marcos emphasized the importance of having council members deeply committed to protecting the nation’s security and sovereignty. The reorganization, he stated, was “necessary to ensure that its council members uphold and protect national security and sovereignty.” This significant move is expected to have a ripple effect on the political landscape of the Philippines, potentially reshaping alliances and influencing policy decisions related to national defense and international relations.
## Political Shake-Up: Marcos Restructures National Security Council



In a move that has sent ripples through Philippine politics, President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has announced a major restructuring of the National Security Council (NSC). This shake-up included the removal of Vice President Sara Duterte from her position on the council.



we sat down with political analyst Dr.Maria Cruz too discuss the potential ramifications of this decision:



**Archyde:** dr. Cruz, the President cited the importance of having council members “deeply committed to protecting the nation’s security and sovereignty.” How do you interpret this statement in light of Vice President Duterte’s removal?



**Dr.Cruz:** President Marcos’ statement is certainly open to interpretation. Some might view it as a purely strategic move to ensure alignment within the NSC, while others might perceive it as a veiled criticism of Vice President Duterte’s stance on national security matters.[[1](https://archyde.com/philippine-vice-president-excluded-from-national-security-council/ )].



**Archyde:** The removal of the Vice President from the NSC follows reports of tensions between the two leaders. Do you believe this restructuring signals a deepening rift within the Philippine government?



**Dr. Cruz:** The timing certainly raises eyebrows. It’s difficult to say with certainty whether this signifies a complete breakdown in their relationship, but it definitely suggests a power shift and potential for future friction within the administration. [[2](https://archyde.com/tensions-rise-as-marcos-removes-duterte-from-national-security-council/)].



**Archyde:** What are the potential implications of this move for Philippine national security policy?



**Dr. Cruz:** This shift could lead to changes in how the Philippines navigates regional security challenges. It remains to be seen whether these changes will be substantative or primarily symbolic.





**Archyde:** Do you think this restructuring will impact the Vice President’s ability to influence policy decisions moving forward?



**Dr. Cruz:** It’s certainly a setback for the Vice President in terms of direct involvement in national security discussions. However,she could still exert influence through other channels,depending on her political strategy.



**Archyde:** what do you think this decision means for the broader political landscape in the Philippines?



**Dr. Cruz:** This move has the potential to reshape alliances within the government and influence policy direction. It will be crucial to observe how other political players react and if this sparks further realignments within the Philippine political landscape.





**Archyde:** We thank Dr. Cruz for her insights. We’d like to hear from our readers! Do you think this restructuring will ultimately benefit or harm the Philippines’ national security interests? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.