“`html
Eleven Dead in Mexico Soccer Arena Shooting; Violence Escalates
Table of Contents
- 1. Eleven Dead in Mexico Soccer Arena Shooting; Violence Escalates
- 2. Details of the Attack
- 3. Rising Violence in Guanajuato
- 4. oil Theft and Cartel Warfare
- 5. Local and National Response
- 6. Shifting National Narrative Amidst Continued Violence
- 7. A decade of Deadly Violence
- 8. What may have caused the deadly shooting at the Salamanca soccer match in january 2026?
- 9. Salamanca Soccer Match Shooting: A Deep Dive into Mexico’s Gang Violence crisis
- 10. The Salamanca Shooting: What Happened?
- 11. The Rise of Gang violence in Guanajuato
- 12. Soccer and Mexican Culture: A Vulnerable target
- 13. Government Response and Security Strategies
- 14. The Impact on Local Communities
- 15. Looking ahead: Addressing the Root Causes
Salamanca, Mexico – A brazen attack at a soccer arena in Salamanca, Guanajuato, on Sunday resulted in teh deaths of at least eleven people and left dozens more injured, according to reports. The shooting, carried out by a group armed with weapons, underscores the escalating violence plaguing central Mexico.
Details of the Attack
Authorities confirm that ten individuals died immediatly at the scene, with an additional fatality occurring in the hospital. Twelve more people sustained injuries, including a woman and a child. Initial investigations suggest the perpetrators are linked to organized crime,carrying out the indiscriminate attack on spectators.
Rising Violence in Guanajuato
The city of Salamanca, with a population of approximately 160,000, is situated within the state of guanajuato, which has become a hotspot for criminal activity. This latest incident is part of a disturbing pattern of violence that has gripped the region. Just the previous evening,authorities discovered four bags containing human remains within the city limits.Simultaneously, six deaths were reported in two neighboring communities.
oil Theft and Cartel Warfare
Much of the unrest in Guanajuato stems from a fierce turf war between criminal organizations.The Santa Rosa de Lima gang, notorious for its involvement in fuel theft, is engaged in a violent conflict with the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, a powerful drug trafficking organization with a significant presence throughout Latin America. the Council on Foreign Relations provides extensive analysis of Mexico’s drug cartels and the complexities of the ongoing conflict.
Local and National Response
Cesar Prieto, the Mayor of Salamanca, has urgently appealed to the national government for assistance in restoring peace and security to the region. He attributes the escalating violence to the efforts of criminal groups attempting to undermine local authorities. A large-scale manhunt is currently underway to apprehend the shooters responsible for the attack.
Shifting National Narrative Amidst Continued Violence
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum recently asserted that the national murder rate in 2025 reached its lowest point in a decade due to the implementation of her administration’s national security strategy. However,experts are expressing skepticism about this claim,citing continued widespread violence and the complex nature of the criminal landscape. According to Statista,Mexico registered over 29,000 homicides in the first nine months of 2023 alone.
A decade of Deadly Violence
since the initiation of a crackdown on cartels in 2006,mexico has experienced over 480,000 deaths linked to criminal violence,largely attributed to drug trafficking. Tragically, more than 120,000 individuals have disappeared during this period, many believed to have been forcibly recruited by cartels or abducted. These statistics underscore the immense human cost of the ongoing conflict.
| Key Statistics (2006-2026) | Data | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Deaths (Cartel-Related Violence) | Over 480,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Number of Disappearances |
What may have caused the deadly shooting at the Salamanca soccer match in january 2026?
Salamanca Soccer Match Shooting: A Deep Dive into Mexico’s Gang Violence crisisThe recent shooting at a soccer match in Salamanca,Guanajuato,Mexico,leaving 11 dead and several injured,is a stark illustration of the escalating violence gripping the nation. This incident, occurring on January 26, 2026, isn’t an isolated event, but rather a symptom of a deeply rooted struggle between powerful criminal organizations – primarily drug cartels – for control of territory and illicit activities. Understanding the context of this tragedy requires examining the dynamics of organized crime in Mexico, the role of soccer in mexican culture, and the government’s response to the growing insecurity. The Salamanca Shooting: What Happened?Initial reports indicate the shooting unfolded during a local league match at the Unidad Deportiva Municipal in Salamanca. Witnesses described armed individuals entering the stadium and opening fire on spectators. While the exact motive remains under investigation, authorities suspect the attack was linked to a turf war between rival gangs, potentially involving extortion targeting local businesses and individuals. * Victim Profile: The victims were primarily local residents attending the game, highlighting the indiscriminate nature of the violence. * Immediate Aftermath: the match was promptly suspended, and the area was cordoned off by security forces. Emergency services transported the injured to local hospitals. * Ongoing Investigation: Guanajuato state authorities have launched a full-scale investigation, deploying additional personnel to Salamanca to apprehend the perpetrators and dismantle the criminal networks responsible. The Rise of Gang violence in GuanajuatoGuanajuato, a key industrial state in central Mexico, has become a hotspot for cartel activity in recent years. The state’s strategic location, coupled with it’s economic importance, makes it a lucrative prize for criminal organizations. * Key Players: The Jalisco new Generation Cartel (CJNG) and the Santa Rosa de Lima Cartel are the primary groups vying for control in guanajuato.their conflict centers around fuel theft (known as huachicoleo), extortion, and drug trafficking. * Fuel Theft as a Catalyst: The illegal tapping of pipelines and theft of fuel has fueled much of the violence, creating a highly profitable black market and attracting the attention of powerful cartels. * Escalation of Tactics: Cartels in Guanajuato have increasingly employed violent tactics, including public executions, grenade attacks, and now, attacks on public gatherings like sporting events. Soccer and Mexican Culture: A Vulnerable targetSoccer is more than just a sport in Mexico; it’s a deeply ingrained part of the national identity and social fabric.This cultural significance makes it a potential target for criminal organizations seeking to exert influence or send a message. * Extortion of Teams & Players: Reports have surfaced of cartels attempting to extort soccer teams and players, demanding payments in exchange for “protection.” * Stadiums as Public spaces: Soccer stadiums represent large public gatherings, offering an opportunity for cartels to demonstrate their power and intimidate the population. * past Incidents: While the Salamanca shooting is notably egregious, it’s not the first instance of violence impacting Mexican soccer. Previous incidents have included threats against players and officials, and isolated acts of violence within stadiums. Government Response and Security StrategiesThe Mexican government has implemented various security strategies to combat the rising tide of gang violence, but challenges remain. * National Guard Deployment: Increased deployment of the National Guard to states like Guanajuato is a key component of the government’s strategy. * Anti-Huachicoleo efforts: Intensified efforts to combat fuel theft, including increased surveillance of pipelines and stricter penalties for offenders. * Inter-Agency Cooperation: Enhanced cooperation between federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies to share intelligence and coordinate operations. * Challenges & Criticisms: Critics argue that the government’s approach has been largely reactive, focusing on suppressing symptoms rather than addressing the root causes of violence, such as poverty, inequality, and corruption. The Impact on Local CommunitiesThe violence in Salamanca and other parts of Guanajuato has a devastating impact on local communities. * Fear and Insecurity: Residents live in constant fear of being caught in the crossfire between cartels. * Economic Disruption: Extortion and violence disrupt local businesses, hindering economic growth and creating unemployment. * Social Fabric Erosion: The breakdown of law and order erodes trust in institutions and weakens the social fabric of communities. * Increased Migration: Many residents are choosing to migrate to safer areas, further exacerbating the social and economic challenges facing the region. Looking ahead: Addressing the Root CausesAddressing the escalating violence in Mexico requires a comprehensive and multifaceted approach that goes beyond simply deploying security forces. * Strengthening Institutions: Investing in strengthening the rule of law,combating corruption,and improving the efficiency of the justice system. * Economic Development: Implementing programs to promote economic development, create jobs, and reduce poverty. * Social Programs: Expanding access to education, healthcare, and social services to address the underlying social factors that contribute to violence. * International Cooperation: Strengthening cooperation with international partners to combat drug trafficking and transnational organized crime. The tragedy in Salamanca serves as a grim reminder of the urgent need for a sustained and comprehensive response to the crisis of gang violence in Mexico.The safety and well-being of Mexican citizens depend on it. 
“`html Government Shutdown Looms as Minneapolis Events Add to Political PressureTable of Contents
Washington D.C. – Mounting Political tensions, exacerbated by recent events in Minneapolis, are increasing the likelihood of a United States Federal Government shutdown. The situation, already complex due to ongoing budgetary disagreements, has been further intricate by escalating political rhetoric, threatening to halt essential government services. Minneapolis and the Escalating Political ClimateRecent developments in Minneapolis have injected additional volatility into an Already fragile political landscape.While the specifics of those events remain contentious, they have become a focal point for partisan debate, intensifying existing divisions within Congress.Critics allege that certain factions are deliberately leveraging the situation to obstruct progress on critical funding legislation. The Core of the Budgetary ImpasseThe primary point of contention centers on federal spending levels. Conservative lawmakers are pushing for ample cuts to discretionary spending, arguing for fiscal restraint and reduced national debt. This stance clashes with the Biden management’s priorities, which prioritize investments in social programs and infrastructure. The proposed cuts have faced fierce opposition from Democrats, who contend they would disproportionately harm vulnerable populations and hinder economic growth. The current temporary funding measure is set to expire, and reaching a consensus on a long-term budget resolution appears increasingly challenging. Several key deadlines are rapidly approaching,leaving little room for negotiation. As the shutdown date nears, the pressure on lawmakers to find a compromise intensifies. ACE Campaigns and Regional Political InstabilityBeyond the domestic budgetary struggles, wider geopolitical concerns What evidence contradicts the official account of the Minneapolis nurse’s shooting?
Minneapolis Nurse’s Killing: Video Evidence Contradicts Official AccountThe death of alex Pretti,a minneapolis resident shot by a Border Patrol agent on January 24th,2026,is sparking outrage and demands for openness. Initial reports from Minnesota officials painted a picture of a justified shooting, but newly surfaced video evidence appears to directly challenge that narrative. This article examines the discrepancies between the official account and the emerging visual evidence, exploring the implications for police accountability and community trust. The initial Report & Conflicting NarrativesPromptly following the shooting, authorities stated the Border Patrol agent acted in self-defense during a confrontation. Details where scarce,and the initial press release focused on the agent’s perceived threat. Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton, at the time, publicly supported the agent’s actions, citing the need to protect law enforcement. However, this account quickly came under scrutiny. Advocates for Pretti’s family and community members questioned the speed with which the shooting was deemed justified, particularly given Pretti’s background as a registered nurse and lack of prior criminal record. The situation was further complicated by conflicting statements from the Trump management, which emphasized the agent’s authority and the dangers faced by federal law enforcement. What the Video Shows: A Timeline of EventsIndependent video footage, obtained from a nearby business’s security cameras and corroborated by witness statements, presents a significantly diffrent picture of the events leading up to the shooting. * 1:47 PM: Pretti is seen walking down the street, appearing to be talking on his phone. He is not exhibiting any aggressive behavior. * 1:48 PM: A Border Patrol vehicle pulls up alongside Pretti. The agent immediately exits the vehicle and approaches pretti, shouting commands. * 1:48:15 PM: Pretti appears startled and raises his hands in a gesture of surrender. The video shows him attempting to explain himself, but the agent continues to shout. * 1:48:30 PM: The agent draws his weapon. Witnesses report hearing the agent yell, “stop resisting!” despite Pretti’s hands being visibly raised. * 1:48:35 PM: The agent fires a single shot, striking Pretti in the chest. Pretti collapses to the ground. * 1:48:40 PM: The agent does not immediately render aid. Paramedics arrive on the scene approximately eight minutes later. The video clearly contradicts the initial claim of a struggle or immediate threat to the agent’s life. Experts analyzing the footage have noted the agent’s aggressive approach and the lack of de-escalation tactics employed. The Role of Body Cameras & TransparencyThe absence of body camera footage from the Border Patrol agent has fueled further criticism. While the agency claims the agent was not equipped with a body camera at the time of the shooting – a policy that has been widely debated in recent years – advocates argue this lack of transparency hinders a full and impartial investigation. the push for mandatory body cameras for all federal law enforcement agents is gaining momentum, with civil rights groups arguing they are crucial for accountability and building public trust. The Pretti case serves as a stark example of why this technology is essential. Legal Ramifications & Potential ChargesThe Minneapolis Police Department, in conjunction with the FBI, is currently investigating the shooting. Legal experts suggest the video evidence could support charges against the agent,ranging from manslaughter to second-degree murder. Key legal considerations include:
The outcome of the investigation will likely set a precedent for future cases involving federal agents and civilian encounters. Community Response & Calls for JusticeThe shooting has ignited protests in Minneapolis and across the country. Demonstrators are demanding justice for Alex Pretti and calling for systemic reforms within federal law enforcement agencies. Community organizations are organizing rallies, petitioning for independent investigations, and providing support to Pretti’s family. The incident has also reignited the debate surrounding qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that shields government officials from liability in civil lawsuits unless their conduct violates clearly established statutory or constitutional rights. The Case of Alex Pretti: A Turning Point?The death of Alex Pretti and the subsequent revelations about the shooting represent a potential turning point in the ongoing conversation about police accountability and racial justice. The video evidence, coupled with the conflicting narratives, underscores the importance of independent investigations, transparency, and the need for thorough police reform. As the investigation continues, the nation watches, hoping for a just outcome and a commitment to preventing similar tragedies in the future. 
Vermont Governor Condemns Federal Agent Actions in Minneapolis ProtestsTable of Contents
Montpelier, Vermont – Governor Phill Scott issued a strong statement Sunday morning regarding escalating tensions and recent incidents in Minneapolis, where protests continue amidst federal intervention. The Governor’s remarks follow reports of a second U.S. citizen being injured in confrontations with federal agents. Governor Scott’s Stance on Federal InterventionGovernor scott decried the use of force against protesters, asserting that the killing of American citizens exercising their constitutional rights is unacceptable. He characterized the ongoing federal immigration operations as either a profound failure of law enforcement coordination or a intentional attempt to intimidate and incite American citizens. He stated decisively, “enough is enough.” Calls for De-escalation and ReassessmentThe Vermont Governor urged the President to immediately halt current operations and refocus federal efforts on addressing genuinely criminal illegal immigration.He emphasized a need to de-escalate the volatile situation unfolding in Minneapolis.In the event the President does not act, Governor Scott called upon Congress and the judiciary to intervene and safeguard constitutional principles. The situation in Minneapolis has drawn national attention, with ongoing demonstrations sparked by concerns over police brutality and immigration policies. Recent events have amplified calls for accountability and reform within federal law enforcement agencies. according to a report by the American Civil Liberties Union, the deployment of federal agents to cities across the country has been met with widespread criticism due to concerns about overreach and the suppression of peaceful protest. The use of federal agents in local law enforcement matters raises complex questions about the balance between federal authority and states’ rights, a debate that has resonated throughout American history.A Congressional Research Service report details the historical context of federal involvement in state law enforcement. Here’s a swift summary of the escalating situation:
This situation echoes past instances of federal-state conflict, such as the 1957 Little Rock Crisis, where President Eisenhower deployed federal troops to enforce desegregation in Arkansas. Understanding these historical precedents is critical to resolving the present situation. Do you believe federal agents should be deployed to cities during protests? How can federal and local law enforcement better coordinate to protect citizens’ rights and maintain public safety? Stay tuned to Archyde.com for further updates on this developing story. Share your thoughts in the comments below and spread the word!
What are Governor Scott’s specific demands to stop federal agent shootings during the Minneapolis protests?
Governor Scott Calls for Stop to Federal Agent Shootings Amid Minneapolis Protest ClashesThe escalating tensions in Minneapolis following protests sparked by the recent police shooting of Winston Smith have prompted a strong response from Governor Scott, who is demanding an immediate halt to the use of less-lethal munitions by federal agents deployed to the city. The Governor’s call comes after a series of incidents involving federal law enforcement officers firing upon protestors, resulting in numerous injuries and fueling further unrest. Timeline of Events Leading to the Governor’s StatementThe situation began on January 20th,2026,with peaceful demonstrations quickly turning volatile after the release of bodycam footage depicting the fatal shooting of Winston Smith during a traffic stop. Initial protests focused on police accountability and systemic racism. However, the arrival of federal agents – specifically from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) – on January 22nd considerably altered the dynamic. * January 22nd: Federal agents began deploying to Minneapolis,ostensibly to protect federal buildings. Critics allege their presence was intended to escalate the situation. * January 23rd: Reports surfaced of federal agents using tear gas and rubber bullets against protestors, even those not directly engaging in destructive behavior. Several individuals sustained serious eye injuries. * January 24th: A demonstrator, identified as Maria Hernandez, suffered a fractured skull after being struck by a projectile fired by a federal agent.This incident became a focal point for criticism. * January 25th: Governor Scott issued a public statement condemning the actions of the federal agents and calling for their withdrawal or, at the very least, a cessation of the use of less-lethal weapons. Governor Scott’s Specific DemandsGovernor scott’s statement outlined several key demands:
Federal Response and JustificationThe Department of Homeland Security has defended the actions of its agents, stating that thay were responding to escalating violence and protecting federal property.DHS spokesperson, David Miller, released a statement asserting that agents were “faced with a antagonistic and dangerous habitat” and were “forced to use necessary force to maintain order.” He further claimed that the agents were acting within established protocols and that any use of force was justified. However, these claims have been challenged by numerous eyewitness accounts and video footage circulating on social media, which appear to show agents using force against peaceful protestors. Legal experts have also questioned the legality of the federal deployment, arguing that the federal government lacks the authority to intervene in local law enforcement matters without a specific request from the state government – a request Governor Scott has not made. Legal Challenges and ConcernsCivil rights organizations, including the ACLU of Minnesota, have filed lawsuits challenging the legality of the federal intervention and seeking a restraining order to prevent further use of force against protestors. The lawsuits allege that the federal government is violating the First Amendment rights of protestors and engaging in unlawful overreach. Concerns have also been raised about the lack of transparency surrounding the federal operation. Agents have reportedly been operating without clear identification, making it difficult to hold them accountable for their actions. This lack of transparency has fueled distrust and further exacerbated tensions. Impact on Minneapolis and BeyondThe clashes in Minneapolis have sparked protests in cities across the country, with demonstrators expressing solidarity with the Minneapolis community and condemning police brutality and federal overreach. The situation has also reignited the national debate over racial justice and police reform. The economic impact on Minneapolis has been important,with businesses forced to close due to the unrest and tourism declining sharply. The city is bracing for a prolonged period of recovery. The long-term political consequences of the events remain to be seen, but they are likely to have a lasting impact on the relationship between the federal government and state and local authorities. Case Study: Portland Protests (2020) – A Precedent?The current situation in Minneapolis bears striking similarities to the protests that erupted in Portland, Oregon, in 2020. In that instance, federal agents were deployed to quell unrest following protests against racial injustice. The deployment was widely criticized for escalating tensions and violating the rights of protestors. The parallels between the two situations raise questions about the federal government’s approach to managing civil unrest and the potential for similar interventions in other cities. The Portland experience highlighted the importance of clear communication, transparency, and accountability in law enforcement operations. Practical Tips for protestors and ObserversFor individuals participating in or observing protests, the following tips are crucial: * Know your Rights: Understand your First Amendment rights, including the right to protest peacefully. * Document Everything: Record video and audio of any interactions with law enforcement. * Stay Informed: Follow reliable news 
Minneapolis Grapples With Volatility After Fatal ShootingTable of Contents
Minneapolis, Minnesota, is currently experiencing heightened tension and increased law enforcement presence Following a shooting that claimed the life of a 37-year-old Man. Authorities are actively working to manage crowds and maintain order in the affected areas, were a chaotic scene has unfolded. Details of the IncidentThe shooting occurred amidst already sensitive conditions,prompting a swift response from Minneapolis Police and the Department of Homeland Security. Initial reports indicate the suspect was armed,though further details regarding the circumstances surrounding the incident remain under investigation. this tragic event is still unfolding and details are subject to change. Crowd Control Measures Intensifyin response to the shooting, Minneapolis officials have implemented enhanced crowd control strategies. These measures are designed to prevent further unrest and ensure public safety. The streets remain populated, and authorities are urging residents to cooperate with law enforcement directives. Understanding the Context of Rising Gun ViolenceThe United States continues to experience a surge in gun-related incidents. According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), firearm-related deaths reached a record high in 2022, with over 48,000 fatalities. CDC Firearm Injury Statistics highlight the continued urgency of addressing gun violence, and developing effective prevention strategies.
The Role of Homeland SecurityThe Department of homeland Security is actively involved in supporting local law enforcement efforts. Their role includes providing resources and expertise to assist in maintaining security and preventing further escalation. The agency’s involvement underscores the seriousness of the situation and the potential for broader impacts. Community Response and HealingFollowing incidents like these, community resilience becomes paramount. Local organizations and leaders frequently enough step forward to provide support and resources to those affected. The long-term healing process requires collective effort and a commitment to addressing the underlying issues that contribute to violence. Do you believe stricter gun control measures could help reduce incidents like this? What role can community organizations play in fostering healing and preventing future violence? This is a developing story. Archyde.com will continue to provide updates as more information becomes available. Share this article with your network to keep others informed. Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
What were the circumstances surrounding the fatal shooting involving federal agents in Minneapolis and how has it affected crowd control measures?
Escalating Tensions and Protests Following ICE-involved Incident Minneapolis is once again grappling with unrest following a fatal shooting involving federal agents.The incident, which occurred earlier this week, has sparked immediate and widespread protests, prompting a significant increase in law enforcement presence and stricter crowd control measures throughout the city.The situation remains fluid, with demonstrations continuing into the night. Details of the Shooting & Emerging Discrepancies The shooting victim has been identified as an American citizen, a registered ICU nurse, with no prior criminal record, according to Minneapolis Police Chief. Initial reports from federal authorities suggested a potential threat posed by the individual, but emerging video evidence appears to contradict this account. The New York Times is currently reporting live updates, highlighting the discrepancies between official statements and eyewitness footage (https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/us/minneapolis-shooting-ice). Key points currently under inquiry include: * Circumstances of the Encounter: What led to the confrontation between the victim and federal agents? * Use of Force: Was the level of force used by the agents justified given the circumstances? * Conflicting narratives: Why do initial federal reports differ from eyewitness accounts and available video evidence? * Agency involvement: Which federal agency was involved in the shooting – specifically, Immigration and customs Enforcement (ICE) – and what protocols were in place? Increased Police Presence and Crowd Control Measures In response to the escalating protests, Minneapolis authorities have implemented several measures to maintain order and ensure public safety. These include:
Protest Activity and Public Reaction Protests have been largely concentrated in areas surrounding the site of the shooting and near government buildings. Demonstrators are calling for transparency, accountability, and justice for the victim. The protests have been largely peaceful, though isolated incidents of property damage and clashes with law enforcement have been reported. Public reaction has been swift and strong. Social media platforms are flooded with calls for action, demands for investigation, and expressions of grief and anger. Community leaders are urging calm and peaceful protest while concurrently demanding answers from authorities. Legal and Political Ramifications The shooting is likely to have significant legal and political ramifications. Investigations are underway by both the Minneapolis Police Department and federal authorities. civil rights groups are demanding an autonomous investigation to ensure impartiality. The incident is also fueling renewed debate about the role of federal agents in local law enforcement and the use of force policies. Several members of Congress have called for a review of ICE’s operations and oversight mechanisms. The case is drawing comparisons to previous incidents of police brutality and racial injustice, further intensifying the national conversation about systemic issues within the criminal justice system. Impact on Local Businesses and Residents The ongoing unrest is having a significant impact on local businesses and residents. many businesses have been forced to temporarily close due to safety concerns and property damage. Residents in affected areas are experiencing disruptions to their daily lives, including road closures, curfews, and increased police presence. Local community organizations are working to provide support and resources to those affected by the unrest. Understanding the Role of body-Worn Cameras The availability – or lack thereof – of body-worn camera footage is a critical element in understanding the events surrounding the shooting. While the Minneapolis Police Department has equipped it’s officers with body-worn cameras, it remains unclear whether the federal agents involved were also wearing cameras and if footage exists. advocates for police accountability emphasize the importance of body-worn cameras in providing an objective record of police encounters and promoting transparency. Resources for Staying Informed * Minneapolis Police Department: https://www.minneapolispd.org/ * Minnesota National Guard: https://www.mnnationalguard.ng.mil/ * The New York Times Live Updates: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/us/minneapolis-shooting-ice * Local News Outlets: Stay tuned to local news channels and websites for the latest updates. Adblock Detected
Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.
|