Target has pulled a 25-dollar children’s Halloween costume from its website and issued a public apology following widespread backlash on social media. Critics accused the retailer of selling an outfit that closely resembled racist 19th-century minstrel and blackface imagery, marking another difficult controversy for the Minneapolis-based company.
The retail giant faced an intense wave of online criticism over the weekend after shoppers spotted the merchandise online. The item, listed as the Kids’ Glows under Blacklight Circus Clown Halloween Costume Bodysuit,
was sold through Target’s Hyde & EEK! Boutique line.
According to images circulating across social media platforms including TikTok, Threads, X, and Instagram, the 25-dollar outfit consisted of an orange-and-black striped bodysuit, black gloves, and a dark face covering featuring an exaggerated, wide, toothy smile. Consumers quickly drew comparisons between the design and historical racist caricatures.
Target Issues Apology and Removes Product
By Sunday, the product page was dead and the item was pulled from shelves and online assortment. A spokesperson for the company confirmed that the costume was produced by a Target-owned brand rather than an outside third-party vendor.
“As a company, we know we got this wrong, and we are deeply sorry. The costume is offensive and should never have been part of our assortment. It is no longer available for sale. We know this is especially hurtful for our Black guests, team members and partners. Removing the costume is an important first step, and the company is looking closely at how this happened and what needs to change to ensure this won’t happen again.”
Target corporate spokesperson, via Newsweek and Snopes
Public reaction was swift. On Threads and other platforms, users expressed disbelief that the design cleared internal reviews. One user posted, So, Target, you really don’t have anyone left in Minneapolis to say, ‘Hey, that’s racist’? Y’all cut DEI and now you’ve got a minstrel clown costume for kids on your website.
Historical Parallels and Online Backlash
Social media commentators and cultural observers contextualized the backlash by pointing to the long history of minstrelsy in the United States. According to the Smithsonian’s National Museum of African American History and Culture, 19th-century blackface minstrelsy involved white performers darkening their faces with burnt cork or shoe polish to mimic enslaved Africans, portraying them through derogatory stereotypes as lazy, ignorant, and superstitious.

Users on social media shared side-by-side comparisons of the child modeling the Target costume alongside historical depictions of the Jim Crow
character popularized in the 1830s. Observers noted similarities not only in the exaggerated facial features and dark face coverings of the costume but also in the poses struck by the model in promotional imagery.
The controversy generated calls from some users to boycott the retailer. The retail corporation has experienced multiple brand controversies over recent years, creating ongoing tension with various consumer groups.
Navigating Corporate Controversies and Financial Context
The Halloween costume dispute arrives as Target continues to work through a challenging period marked by shifting public relations and political pressures. In early 2025, the company faced an organized boycott spearheaded by Black faith leaders and churches after scaling back several diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives. That friction weighed on customer traffic and corporate performance, leading the retailer to eliminate roughly 500 positions across distribution centers and regional offices in early 2026.

The company has also weathered other cultural debates, including a 2023 online uproar over tuck friendly
swimwear introduced for its Pride month collection. Despite these headwinds, the retailer recently reported positive financial indicators. For the quarter ended August 1, net sales rose 5.3 percent to 26.5 billion dollars, up from 25.2 billion dollars a year prior, beating Wall Street projections.