President Donald Trump’s decision to bypass the 25th-anniversary Ground Zero commemoration on September 11 sparked a fierce political dispute that quickly devolved into a blistering personal attack on The New York Times reporter Maggie Haberman.
The Clash Over Ground Zero and the No-Speech Rule
The controversy ignited when reports surfaced indicating that Donald Trump’s team decided to skip the official New York City ceremony after memorial planners reminded them of a strict policy. According to The New York Times, organizers reiterated that politicians are barred from speaking at the Ground Zero site—a rule enacted in 2012 following contentious political battles during the memorial’s construction that deeply frustrated victims’ families.
Rather than attending the Manhattan observance, the White House announced that Trump will mark the solemn 25th anniversary of the 2001 terrorist attacks at the Pentagon. Vice President JD Vance will represent the administration at the Ground Zero ceremony instead. Expected attendees in New York include former Mayor Rudy Giuliani alongside former Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama.
Rather than letting the scheduling conflict pass quietly, Trump took to Truth Social to launch a scathing tirade against Haberman, the journalist behind the reporting. Trump labeled Haberman a “stalker” and accused her of inventing sources to fabricate the dispute over speeches.
In a subsequent post, Trump escalated his insults: “Maggot Hagerman, the Fake Reporter from The Failing New York Times, an unattractive person both inside and out, and who knows less about me than most reporters on the beat (She’s a SCAMMER!), made up a story that on September 11th, I’m not going to the World Trade Center, in New York City, because they won’t let me make a speech, and I’m going to the Pentagon in D.C., because I’m a featured speaker.”
Haberman Fires Back and Defends The Times’ Reporting
Appearing on MS NOW’s The Weekend, Haberman pushed back firmly against the personal attacks and defended the integrity of the newspaper’s reporting. Discussing the sequence of events with host Jacqueline Alemany—who refused to repeat the president’s insults on air—Haberman emphasized the transparency maintained by the journalistic team.
“Look, we stand by the reporting and the Times put out a statement explaining that this is based on multiple sources,” Haberman stated during her appearance. She noted that reporters approached the White House prior to publication with full transparency regarding the reasons behind Trump altering his schedule.
“We were quite transparent with them about what we were reporting, including the part about that part of the reason why he was not going to New York was because he did want to speak, and the White House did not say anything, pushing back on what we were reporting. And then 24 hours later, the president started attacking the piece. You know, so readers can make their own assessment about a denial that comes a day later,” Haberman added.
While the White House maintained to MS NOW that Trump’s absence from New York is solely due to protocol preventing him and Vice President Vance from occupying the same high-security location simultaneously, Haberman dismissed this rationale as a post-hoc justification. She noted that Trump’s appearance at Ground Zero in 2024—undertaken shortly after surviving an assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania—demonstrates that his scheduling dynamics are fluid and uniquely scrutinized.
Logistics, Security, and the 25th Anniversary Context
The operational realities of modern presidential travel also factor into the itinerary. Following the Pentagon observance, Trump plans to travel onward to his golf course in Doonbeg, Ireland. White House logistics teams often find departures from Joint Base Andrews in Maryland vastly more streamlined than navigating congested tri-state area airports around heavily secured major public events.
White House Spokesperson Anna Kelly framed the upcoming anniversary through a lens of remembrance, emphasizing the administration’s official stance. “On the 25th anniversary of this tragic day, the President will remember those who were killed at the hands of evil terrorists, honor their loved ones, and pay tribute to the brave first responders who put their lives on the line to rescue their fellow Americans,” Kelly stated.
As the nation approaches a somber milestone two and a half decades removed from the defining tragedy of the modern era, the friction between political maneuvering and historical commemoration remains palpable. Whether the focus stays on the victims or the media sparring surrounding the event, the 25th-anniversary observance is shaping up to be as politically charged as ever. What do you make of the shifting itineraries and the ongoing feud between political figures and the press? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below.
Keep reading
