U.S. Proposes Long-term Gaza Stabilisation Force to United Nations Until 2027

November 5, 2025

International Force Proposed for Gaza as Hostage Remains Repatriated

Washington is circulating a draft United Nations resolution outlining a plan for an international stabilization force in Gaza, potentially lasting at least two years. This progress occurs as the remains of additional hostages held by Hamas have been returned to Israel,marking a fragile step forward in the ongoing conflict.

Details of the Proposed Stabilization Force

The proposed force, if approved by the UN Security Council, would be tasked with overseeing the demilitarization of the Gaza Strip and ensuring the decommissioning of weapons held by non-state armed groups. According to officials familiar with the draft, the initiative is envisioned as a key component of a broader plan to achieve a lasting ceasefire and enable reconstruction in the devastated territory.

The plan, originating from discussions led by the United States, is still in its early stages, subject to negotiation among the 15 members of the security Council and other international stakeholders. Arab nations and other potential contributors have indicated that UN backing is crucial for their participation.

UN Secretary-General antónio Guterres emphasized the need for legitimacy, stating that any entity established in Gaza should operate under a Security Council mandate.

Challenges and Obstacles

Securing approval from the UN Security Council is expected to be challenging, particularly given the potential opposition from China and Russia, both permanent members with veto power. The United States will need to navigate complex diplomatic hurdles to gain their support or overcome potential vetoes.

A notable aspect of the plan centers on disarming Hamas, a condition the militant group has not yet fully embraced. The draft resolution also foresees the establishment of a “Board of peace” to temporarily govern Gaza, working in collaboration with the stabilization force. Close coordination with Egypt and Israel is also stipulated within the proposed framework.

Return of Hostage Remains

On Tuesday, the Israeli Defense Forces confirmed the recovery of the remains of IDF soldier Itay Chen, returned by Hamas as part of the ongoing ceasefire agreement. This brings the total number of hostage remains returned to Israel to 20 since the start of the truce on October 10.

Hamas continues to release the remains of hostages intermittently, with Israel reciprocating by releasing Palestinian prisoners. To date, the remains of 270 Palestinians have been transferred to Israeli authorities. However, identification efforts are hampered by a shortage of DNA testing kits in Gaza, leading authorities to publish images of the remains online in hopes of family identification.

key Metrics	Data (as of nov 5, 2025)
Hostage Remains Returned	20
Palestinian Remains Released	270
Proposed Stabilization Force Duration	Minimum 2 years
Conflict Start Date	October 7, 2023

The current conflict was triggered by a Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, resulting in approximately 1,200 fatalities and the abduction of 251 individuals. Israel’s subsequent military operation has led to over 68,800 Palestinian deaths in Gaza, according to data from the Gaza Health Ministry.

Understanding international Stabilization Forces

International stabilization forces are typically deployed to post-conflict zones to maintain peace, security, and order. These forces frequently enough consist of troops from multiple countries and operate under a UN mandate.Their tasks range from disarming combatants and providing security to supporting political transitions and rebuilding institutions. Similar missions have been undertaken in bosnia, Kosovo, and Timor-Leste.

The success of such forces heavily depends on the cooperation of local actors, the clarity of the mandate, and the availability of sufficient resources.

Frequently Asked Questions about Gaza and the Proposed Stabilization Force

• What is the primary goal of the proposed stabilization force in Gaza? The main objective is to ensure the demilitarization of Gaza and facilitate a lasting ceasefire.
• What challenges does the US face in securing UN approval for this force? Potential vetoes from china and Russia are significant hurdles.
• How many hostages were initially taken during the October 7th attack? A total of 251 individuals were taken hostage.
• What is the role of Hamas in the return of hostage remains? Hamas is responsible for the release of the remains, a process that has been occurring incrementally under the ceasefire.
• What are the concerns regarding the figures released by the Gaza Health Ministry? Israel disputes the ministry’s reported death toll, but no choice figures have been provided.
• How long is the proposed stabilization force expected to remain in Gaza? The draft resolution proposes a minimum deployment of two years.
• What is the “Board of Peace” mentioned in the plan? It is a proposed governing body intended to temporarily administer Gaza in collaboration with the stabilization force.

Do you think an international force is the best path forward for Gaza? What conditions are essential for the successful implementation of such a mission? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

what are the potential implications of resistance from Hamas and other militant groups on the success of the proposed Gaza stabilisation force?

the Proposal: A Multi-National Approach to Gaza Security

The United states has formally proposed the establishment of a long-term, multi-national stabilisation force for Gaza to the United nations Security Council, with a proposed operational timeline extending until 2027. This initiative, revealed on November 4th, 2025, aims to address the complex security and humanitarian challenges facing the region following recent conflicts. The core objective is to prevent the resurgence of Hamas and other militant groups, while simultaneously facilitating the delivery of essential aid and supporting the rebuilding of Gaza’s infrastructure. This proposed Gaza stabilisation force represents a important shift in U.S. policy towards the region,moving beyond short-term interventions to a sustained commitment to long-term security.

Key Components of the Stabilisation Force

The proposed force isn’t envisioned as a conventional occupying army. Instead, it’s structured around several key components:

* International Composition: The U.S. proposal emphasizes a broad international coalition, including contributions from Arab nations (specifically Egypt and Jordan), European Union member states (France, Germany, and Italy are being actively courted), and potentially select African nations with experiance in peacekeeping operations.

* Phased Deployment: The deployment would occur in phases. phase one focuses on securing key infrastructure – border crossings, power plants, and water facilities. Phase two involves training and equipping a reformed palestinian security force. Phase three concentrates on long-term security monitoring and counter-terrorism efforts.

* Mandate & Rules of Engagement: The UN Security Council resolution would define a clear mandate for the force, focusing on:

* Preventing the re-armament of Hamas and other militant groups.

* Securing the Gaza-Egypt border to prevent weapons smuggling.

* Protecting humanitarian aid convoys.

* Supporting the Palestinian authority in re-establishing governance.

* Force Size & Budget: initial estimates suggest a force size of between 10,000 and 15,000 personnel. The proposed budget, to be funded through a combination of U.S. contributions and international pledges, is estimated at $50 billion over the three-year period. Gaza reconstruction will be a key budgetary consideration.

Diplomatic Hurdles and regional Reactions

The U.S. proposal faces significant diplomatic hurdles. Russia and China, permanent members of the UN Security Council, have expressed reservations, citing concerns about sovereignty and potential for prolonged foreign intervention. Securing their approval, or at least abstention, is crucial for the resolution to pass.

Regional reactions have been mixed. Egypt, while cautiously supportive, has emphasized the need for a clear exit strategy and a commitment to addressing the underlying political issues driving the conflict. Jordan has signaled its willingness to contribute personnel and logistical support. Israel’s goverment, while publicly welcoming the proposal as a step towards long-term security, has privately raised concerns about the force’s mandate and potential limitations on its military operations within Gaza. recent reports, like the one from YLE regarding Israeli negotiators heading to Egypt (https://yle.fi/a/74-20186629/64-3-280043), highlight the ongoing diplomatic efforts to navigate these complexities.

Potential Benefits of a Stabilisation Force

A successfully implemented stabilisation force could yield several benefits:

* Enhanced Security: A sustained international presence could deter Hamas and other militant groups from re-establishing control, creating a more secure environment for both Israelis and Palestinians.

* Humanitarian Relief: The force could facilitate the unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid, addressing the urgent needs of Gaza’s population. gaza humanitarian crisis remains a critical concern.

* Economic Recovery: A stable security environment is essential for attracting investment and rebuilding Gaza’s economy.

* Political Transition: the force could provide a security umbrella during a potential political transition, allowing for the development of a more inclusive and representative Palestinian government.

* Reduced Regional Tensions: A long-term solution in Gaza could contribute to broader regional stability, reducing tensions between Israel and its neighbors.

Challenges and Risks Associated with the Force

Despite the potential benefits,the proposed force faces numerous challenges and risks:

* Resistance from Militant Groups: Hamas and other militant groups are likely to resist the presence of the force,potentially leading to clashes and escalating violence.

* Political Instability: The Palestinian political landscape is deeply fractured. A lack of unity among Palestinian factions could undermine the force’s effectiveness.

* Financial Sustainability: Securing long-term funding for the force could prove tough, particularly if the political situation deteriorates.

* exit Strategy: Defining a clear and realistic exit strategy is crucial to avoid a prolonged and unsustainable intervention.

* Sovereignty Concerns: Balancing the need for international intervention with respect for Palestinian sovereignty is a delicate task. *Palestinian self-