BUENOS AIRES — Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently made a significant announcement, marking a reversal of the Trump administration’s stance on Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Blinken stated that these settlements are “inconsistent with international law,” firmly opposing their expansion. This change in position comes in response to reports of the far-right Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plans for further settlement expansion.
The decision, which was also announced at the White House, was met with a U.S. official’s confirmation of the Israeli government’s intention to expand settlements. This move was criticized as it undermines Israel’s security and the U.S. administration’s support. The decision to clarify Washington’s position on settlements had been researched and planned beforehand, reflecting the administration’s growing unease with Israeli actions in Gaza and the West Bank.
The statement declaring Israeli settlements on occupied territory illegal brings U.S. policy back to its 1978 stance, which declared settlements “inconsistent with international law.” This opinion stated that “territory coming under control of a belligerent occupant does not thereby become its sovereign territory.” The number of Israeli settlements has grown significantly since then, with at least 146 authorized settlements in the West Bank, excluding East Jerusalem, and 144 unrecognized settlements.
Former President Trump’s administration deviated from this policy in 2019, with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo stating that the United States no longer considered settlements a violation of international law. However, the Biden administration has reaffirmed the previous stance, bringing it in line with previous U.S. administrations. Throughout his presidential campaign, President Biden pledged his commitment to a two-state solution without explicitly promising to undo Trump’s actions, such as moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and recognizing Israeli annexation of the Golan Heights.
Secretary of State Blinken, during his first visit to Israel, reiterated the Biden administration’s opposition to any steps that could incite violence or hinder the pursuit of a two-state solution, including the construction of new settlements. However, the Netanyahu government persists in expanding existing settlements, leading to a surge in violence on the West Bank.
The violence in the region has escalated since the October 7 attacks by Hamas in southern Israel, resulting in the ongoing military operations by Israel in Gaza. The United Nations reports that the conflict has claimed the lives of approximately 30,000 Palestinians. Meanwhile, violence across the West Bank and East Jerusalem has led to the deaths of 13 Israelis and injuries to 86 individuals.
The Biden administration initially aimed to avoid involvement in this issue, labeling settlements as “unhelpful.” However, the past four and a half months have highlighted the explosive nature of this matter, necessitating action. As tensions continue to rise, it is imperative to address the situation.
This development has significant implications for the future of Israeli-Palestinian relations. The reversal in the U.S. stance on settlements reflects a renewed commitment to align with international consensus and previous administrations’ positions. It indicates a willingness on the part of the Biden administration to prioritize the pursuit of peace and a two-state solution.
Looking ahead, it is crucial for the international community to support diplomatic efforts and engage in dialogue with all parties involved. Continued settlement expansion poses a serious barrier to peace and compromises the prospects of a viable Palestinian state. It is vital for global powers, including the United States, to utilize their influence to encourage positive steps forward, such as a freeze on settlement construction and a commitment to negotiations.
In conclusion, the recent reversal in the U.S. position on Israeli settlements in the West Bank underscores the Biden administration’s commitment to international law and pursuit of a two-state solution. The implications of this decision are far-reaching, potentially shaping the future of Israeli-Palestinian relations. It is crucial for global actors to support diplomatic efforts, advocate for peace, and push for a resolution that respects the rights and aspirations of both Israelis and Palestinians.