Four days after Novak Djokovic’s appeal against the annulment of his visa was rejected, the Federal Supreme Court announced its reasoning. It was therefore reasonable for the Australian government to assume that the Serbian tennis pro had anti-vaccination attitudes and was a threat to the population. This emerges from the documents that the court published on Thursday.
“A world tennis star can influence people of all ages, whether young or old, but perhaps especially the young and the easily impressed,” said the three judges. Even if Djokovic hadn’t won the Australian Open, the fact that he plays tennis in Australia could have encouraged those who want to be like him and thus fueled anti-vaccination sentiment, it said.
Related posts:
Cruz Azul Close to Signing Kevin Castaño and Diber Cambindo: Latest Transfer News and Rumors for Ope...
Health Safety Concerns: Harmful Pesticides Found in Moroccan Watermelon Shipment Sparks Worries
Monte-Carlo: the night of Turini smiles at Ogier, Neuville fourth after a little scare
They denounce sexual abuse at the José María Cullen hospital in Santa Fe | The defendant is a medic...
Hossam Habib defeats his ex-wife, Sherine Abdel Wahab, a hot dance compass, accompanied by a famous ...
Higher protein intake while dieting leads to healthier eating - healing practice
If you have these symptoms .. stop drinking coffee immediately!
???? Bochum - Bayern Munich: mercilessly, the Bavarians offer themselves a new recital with a double...