[TheEpochTimesFebruary192022](Comprehensive report by The Epoch Times reporter Li Jing)XuzhouThe authorities have issued four notifications successively, and finally changed their tune to “Yang Mouxia“The event is characterized asTraffickingwomen’s case, but officials insist “Yang Mouxia“It’s not Li Ying, a lost woman in Sichuan. However, a technology blogger conducted a technical comparison of the images of “Yang Mouxia”, and the results were shocking.
On February 17, the CCP authorities announced the establishment of an investigation team in Jiangsu Province to investigate the “Yang Mouxia” incident. The authorities had previously issued a notice saying that after a DNA test and comparison, it was determined that “Yang Xia” was the “Xiaohuamei” of Yunnan. In addition, the authorities also claimed that “Yang Xia” was not Li Ying, a lost woman in Sichuan.
However, public opinion has questioned the authorities’ so-called “scientific proof”.
Recently, a Weibo technology blogger “GenJi really wants to teach you” released a video,XuzhouFeng CountyWhether the “Yang Xia” is Li Ying or “Xiao Huamei”, the image processing technology is reproduced and displayed.
The blogger used a photo of Li Ying and the official “Yang Mouxia” for comparison. After zooming in on the photo, he found that the nose and mouth of the two were “exactly the same.”
According to another photo of “Yang Mouxia” officially released, the blogger found that the bones of the two were almost the same.
He said that the most frightening thing about this process is not the comparison of the bones, but the direct reduction of the opacity of the two pictures. You will find that in the process of reducing, this picture is so natural, like How old a person is from how old they are.
The blogger said that we made this matter public so that more girls did not have similar experiences, rather than Xuzhou starting to block this (image reproduction) push on a large scale.
At present, the blogger’s Weibo account has been officially blocked.
Previously, the Xuzhou authorities had issued four notices, stating that “Yang Xia” and Dong Zhimin were “legal husband and wife” at first, and finally changed their words to say that Dong Zhimin and others were suspected of “unlawful detention” and “unlawful detention”.Traffickingwomen’ sins.
In the third circular issued by the authorities, regarding the identity of “Yang Mouxia”, the official said the investigation team checked the marriage registration application materials of Dong Moumin and “Yang Mouxia” and found that it contained “Yagu Village, Fugong County, Yunnan Province”. ”, and immediately sent personnel to Yunnan for verification.
The report stated that “Yang Mouxia” was originally named “Xiaohuamei” (parents deceased), and was from Yagu Village, Fugong County, Yunnan Province. “Xiaohuamei” married in Baoshan City, Yunnan Province in 1994. After her divorce in 1996, she returned to Yagu Village. At that time, she had shown abnormal speech and behavior. Sang Moumou from the same village took “Xiaohuamei” to Jiangsu for treatment. After the two arrived in Donghai County, Jiangsu Province, “Xiaohuamei” went missing. At that time, Sang did not call the police or inform “Xiaohuamei”‘s family.
However, former “Yunnan Information News” reporters Massa and Tiemu recently went to Yagu Village and Puluo Village in Fugong County, Yunnan Province to conduct on-the-spot interviews to find out the truth. The announcement of the so-called field investigation is a lie.
In addition, Beijing lawyer Hao Yachao issued a document questioning the Xuzhou report, which is full of loopholes and seriously violates common sense.
Lawyer Hao Yachao said Xuzhou’s report contradicted itself. His acceptance of “Yagu Village, Fugong County, Yunnan Province” on the marriage registration goes against basic common sense. In fact, the address information is not trustworthy at all! Xuzhou’s investigation capacity is insufficient, and it is a serious mistake to use this information as the direction of investigation.
She said that “Sang Moumou”‘s statement seriously violated common sense and should not be accepted. This statement does not meet the “high probability” standard of proof in civil litigation, nor does it meet the standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt” in criminal litigation, but Xuzhou accepted it without a comprehensive investigation into the family of “Xiao Huamei”! The level of investigation was not convincing enough, and it was suspected of covering up Sang, who was “suspected of abducting and trafficking in women.”
Regarding the establishment of an investigation team by the authorities, the Twitter user “Proud Girl” who has been following the incident believes that Jiangsu’s high-profile establishment of an investigation team is not to investigate the problem, but to completely “finally” block it.
“Proud Girl” said: 1. They have arranged marketing accounts on major platforms such as Weibo and WeChat official accounts, completely denying “Li Ying”‘s statement, and saying that those pictures on the Internet have been restored, which is not credible! 2. They compared the DNA of Xiao Huamei with Li Ying’s mother, but did not extract the DNA of Li Ying who is still in the hospital to compare with Li Ying’s mother. 3. Cooperate with the Sichuan side to announce: The DNA of Li Ying’s mother does not match! 4. A press conference was held, and all the shameless official media cooperated with the report, completely denying it was Li Ying!
Xuzhou did not disappoint everyone, did it? Everything is played according to the familiar routine!
When they posted this face biometric comparison and confirmed it was Li Ying, they would not have thought that when we visited Li Ying as early as, 1, “accidentally” hurt her hand, wipe it in time! 2. Helped her “tidy up” her hair! 3. She also used a mask to wipe off her frozen snot! 4. She took two pieces of clothing that contained her body fluids and confirmed that she left China https://t.co/cbpVTTR3lc pic.twitter.com/IX7L9EAvDQ— Proud Girl (@ZH_mzghg) February 7, 2022
Responsible editor: Sun Yun#