A court resolves a lawsuit against “famous” Snape and Tik Tok, accusing an activist of inciting her husband to associate with “fashionistas” and beauty queens.

Al-Marsad newspaper: The Supreme Court issued its ruling in a sabotage lawsuit filed by one of the “famous” social media platforms against a social activist who accused her of spoiling her marital relationship, by accusing her of making insulting statements against her dignity and reputation.

The court upheld what was issued by the Court of Appeal to cancel the prison sentence imposed on the social activist, because the accusation of vandalism had not been proven after a previous preliminary ruling of her imprisonment had been issued. ١٥ One day, he took the pledge.

In the details, “Okaz” published, that the Court of Appeal reversed the ruling issued by the Jeddah Court convicting the social activist and imprisoning her for 15 days for vandalizing a social media celebrity. Objection to the appeal.

The activist asked the court to refer Shahira to the Public Prosecution for investigation on the allegation of fraud against the court and to prove the maliciousness of the complaint filed against her.

And the famous “Snapchat, Tik Tok, and YouTube” stated that the social activist, the defendant, tried to mislead her husband by urging him to marry “fashionistas and beauty queens”, with offensive phrases.

The Court of Appeal said that treachery cannot be imagined by the husband, nor can it be imagined that the husband will harass his wife; Because the infallibility is in his hand, and accordingly the court ruled to overturn the imprisonment sentence against the social activist, and that it was not proven that she had vandalized the social media celebrity, and the case was dismissed, and the ruling acquired the final status with the support of the Supreme Court.

The Court of First Instance had convicted the social activist of the crime of sabotage and punished her with 15 days in prison with a pledge. She objected to the verdict before the Court of Appeal, which examined the pleadings and objections, and decided in light of this not to convict the social activist, acquitted and rejected the plaintiff’s suit.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.