The theater and film actress gave an interview, telling her truth.
The legendary artistic director of Lenkom Mark Zakharov passed away in 2019, almost three years ago. He was 85 years old. From that moment on, Shakespearean passions, one might say, are seething in the theater. The main action unfolded between the only daughter of the late director Alexandra Zakharova and director of a cultural institution.
The heiress of Mark Anatolyevich did not lose hope that she would be able to resolve all disputes about her father’s performances with the current director of Lenkom peacefully. However, in the end, the actress had to turn to the guardians of the law. These are the memories Alexandra Zakharova shared when talking about the dispute with Mark Varshaver.
“Six months after my father passed away, the time has come to resolve issues of inheritance. Although there are no questions as such. I am the only daughter. I remember how I came to the director’s office, where Varshaver and Yanklovich were sitting (theatrical producer Valery Yanklovich, – Approx. ed.), asked something about the performances, and Yanklovich said that Zakharov’s performances belong to him, the producer Yanklovich. I quietly asked if I could see the contracts. Of course, no one showed them to me, they say, “later-later,” complains the daughter of Mark Zakharov.
In addition, the actress was required to provide a certificate stating that she was indeed the only heiress of her father. More delays followed. As a result, as Alexandra Markovna assured, Varshaver simply began to aggravate relations. “Some kind of absentee insults began. Perhaps he wanted me to stop trying to finally see the contracts. But I already understood that these documents simply do not exist, ”added Zakharova.
The situation was clarified by a lawyer who represents the interests of the family of the late artistic director of Lenkom.
The human rights activist clarified that according to the law, if the defendant cannot provide the originals of the contract, its copies must have a certain type of seal and a visa of the responsible person, in this case the general director, stating that the copy is correct. They requested precisely such copies of contracts for performances.
“But to make a decision on an uncertified copy, and even of such a quality that it is not accepted by any examination, having written in the protocol that the defendant does not have such documents, well … this, as you understand, is absurd. A normal court will not do this, ”the lawyer shared in an interview. Sobesednik.com.
See also
More stellar news Telegram channel!