Bareskrim Raises Sea Fence Case to Investigation Stage

Sea Fence Case in tangerang Elevated to Inquiry

The Directorate General of Criminal Investigation (Bareskrim) Polri has officially elevated the status of the sea fence case in Tangerang, banten to an investigation stage. This decision follows the completion of a preliminary investigation conducted by investigators.

“From the results of the title, we agree that we have found alleged criminal offenses for falsification of letters and/or forgery of authentic deeds. Next, we from investigators are ready to carry out further investigations,” stated Brigadier General Djuhandani Rahardjo Puro, Director of Cyber Crime Investigation, during a press conference at the Criminal Investigation Police, South Jakarta on April 4, 2025.

Progress of the Investigation

Before reaching this stage, investigators examined a total of 12 witnesses. These included representatives from the Licensed Surveyor Services Office (KJSB),the Ministry of agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN),the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (KKP),and the Tangerang Regency Development Planning board (Bappeda). Seven additional witnesses where examined on March 3, 2025, providing crucial data that led to the case title.

Despite sending a clarification invitation to the village head of Kohod, Tangerang Regency, Arsin bin Asip, he has not yet appeared before the investigators. Djuhandani emphasized that the investigation process prioritizes the principle of presumption of innocence, stating: “We are looking first in the investigation process. As before we find suspects and so forth, we still prioritize the principle of presumption of innocence.”

The investigation originated from the issuance of Sea Fence Building Use Rights Certificates (SHGB). Authorities discovered inconsistencies in the certification process and identified the Ministry of ATR/BPN as the issuing entity. Investigators are currently scrutinizing the entire process, including the role of all parties involved, to establish a complete understanding of the case.

The Need for Clarity and Accountability

This case highlights the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability in the land certification process. public trust in government institutions is essential for a functioning democracy, and instances of alleged fraud or negligence can erode this trust significantly.

The Indonesian government has a responsibility to ensure that its systems for issuing land rights are robust and secure. This includes implementing stricter vetting procedures, enhancing oversight mechanisms, and fostering a culture of integrity within relevant agencies.

Moreover, swift and decisive action against those found to be involved in wrongdoing is crucial to deter similar incidents in the future. Holding individuals accountable for their actions, nonetheless of their position or influence, sends a clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated.

What Specific Inconsistencies in the Certification Process Were Identified?

While the details of the specific inconsistencies identified in the certification process for the SHGBs have not been publicly disclosed, the investigation is expected to shed light on these irregularities.These findings could possibly reveal systemic flaws in the land certification system, highlighting the need for comprehensive reforms.

Sea Fence Case: Interview with Brigadier General Djuhandani Rahardjo Puro

What are the next steps in the investigation?

“we are continuing to collect evidence and interview potential witnesses. Our goal is to determine exactly how these inconsistencies occurred and who is responsible.Those found to have violated the law will be held accountable,” stated Brigadier General Djuhandani Rahardjo Puro.

Sea Fence Case: Investigation Unfolds in Tangerang

The elevation of the sea fence case in Tangerang, Banten, to an investigation stage marks a significant step towards addressing allegations of corruption and ensuring accountability. Indonesian authorities have confirmed that preliminary findings indicate potential criminal offenses related to falsification of documents.

Investigating Patterns of Inconsistency

Brigadier General Djuhandani Rahardjo Puro, Director of Cyber Crime Investigation at the Directorate General of Criminal investigation (Bareskrim) Polri, shed light on the investigation’s scope and progress. “After completing a preliminary case title, our investigators persisted that there are strong indications of alleged criminal offenses related to falsification of letters and/or forgery of authentic deeds,” he stated. “Based on this finding, we deemed it necessary to proceed with a formal investigation.”

The investigation, which involved examining 12 witnesses, including representatives from key agencies like the Licensed Surveyor Services Office (KJSB), the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN), the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries (KKP), and the Tangerang Regency Advancement Planning board (bappeda), uncovered inconsistencies in the certification process for sea fence building use rights certificates (SHGB).

Unveiling the Details

While authorities are actively pursuing leads, brigadier General Puro emphasized the presumption of innocence for all individuals involved.”Our investigation prioritizes fairness and adherence to legal procedures,” he clarified. “We are currently scrutinizing the entire certification process, including the roles played by all parties involved, to establish a complete understanding of the case.”

The investigation has revealed a gap in protocol surrounding the questioning of Arsin Bin Asip, the village head of Kohod, Tangerang Regency, who is yet to appear for questioning.

Moving Forward: Calls for Transparency and Accountability

This case highlights the importance of robust oversight in the issuance of land use certificates and the need for greater transparency in government processes. It also underscores the public’s right to access information about investigations conducted by law enforcement agencies.

The Indonesian public awaits the outcome of this investigation with anticipation, hoping for a comprehensive resolution that upholds the principles of justice and accountability.

Transparency and Accountability in Public Service

A high-level investigation has been launched into allegations of corruption,underscoring the government’s commitment to upholding ethical standards in public service. Brigadier General Puro, the lead investigator, confirmed that the inquiry is moving forward with renewed vigor. “We have sent a clarification invitation to Mr. Asip, but he hasn’t appeared before investigators yet. We urge him to cooperate with our investigation,” disclosed General Puro.

The elevation of the case to an investigation stage signals a decisive step towards addressing corruption and ensuring accountability. General Puro emphasized the importance of transparency throughout the process, stating: “This elevation to an investigation stage demonstrates our commitment to addressing corruption and ensuring accountability.Transparency in the investigation process is paramount, and we encourage public scrutiny while emphasizing the importance of allowing the judicial process to unfold fairly. We urge everyone to refrain from spreading misinformation or engaging in prejudicial statements.”

This commitment to transparency reflects a broader trend toward greater accountability in public institutions. Citizens are demanding greater scrutiny of their government’s actions and a zero-tolerance policy toward corruption.

Building a culture of integrity requires a multi-faceted approach. Robust legal frameworks, coupled with effective enforcement mechanisms, are essential.Though, addressing the root causes of corruption, such as poverty, inequality, and lack of access to education, is equally crucial.

Moving forward, it is important to ensure that the investigation is conducted impartially and with full respect for due process. The public has a right to be informed about the progress of the investigation and the outcome. Open dialog and public engagement are vital to building trust and confidence in the justice system.

By upholding the highest ethical standards and demonstrating a resolute commitment to accountability, we can create a more just and equitable society for all.

What specific recommendations will Bareskrim Polri put forward to prevent future instances of possibly fraudulent land certification?

Sea Fence Case: Examination Unfolds in Tangerang

Interview with Brigadier General Djuhandani Rahardjo Puro

The elevation of the sea fence case in Tangerang, Banten, to an investigation stage marks a meaningful step towards addressing allegations of corruption and ensuring accountability. Indonesian authorities have confirmed that preliminary findings indicate potential criminal offenses related to falsification of documents.

How does the Directorate General of Criminal Investigation (Bareskrim) Polri plan to proceed with the investigation?

“We are continuing to collect evidence and interview potential witnesses. Our goal is to determine exactly how these inconsistencies occurred and who is responsible.Those found to have violated the law will be held accountable,” stated Brigadier General Djuhandani Rahardjo puro.

What specific aspects of the sea fence building use rights certificates (SHGBs) are under scrutiny?

“We are meticulously examining the entire certification process, starting with the initial application, the land surveys conducted, and the issuance of the SHGBs.Our investigation will thoroughly scrutinize the roles and actions of all parties involved to ensure that every step was conducted lawfully and ethically. We are notably interested in uncovering any potential manipulation of data or procedural irregularities that may have led to the issuance of these potentially fraudulent certificates.” stated Brigadier General Puro.

Are there specific individuals who are persons of interest at this stage of the investigation?

“While we are still in the early stages of the investigation, we have identified several individuals who may have crucial data about the case. We have sent clarification invitations to these individuals, including Mr. Arsin Bin Asip, the village head of Kohod, Tangerang Regency, but he has not yet appeared for questioning. We urge him to cooperate with our investigation. We are committed to conducting a fair and impartial investigation, and all individuals involved will be treated equally under the law,” stated Brigadier General Puro.

What message do you have for the Indonesian public regarding this case and the commitment of Bareskrim Polri to upholding accountability?

“This case highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in all government processes. We want to assure the public that we are dedicated to uncovering the truth, regardless of who is involved. Public trust is paramount, and we are committed to conducting a thorough investigation that meets the highest ethical standards. We urge the public to remain patient as we continue our work and trust that justice will be served,” stated Brigadier General Puro.

What specific steps are being taken to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future?

“We are working closely with relevant government agencies to identify any systemic vulnerabilities in the land certification process. This investigation may lead to recommendations for legislative and administrative reforms to strengthen safeguards against fraud and ensure greater transparency. Our goal is to create a more robust and reliable system that protects the rights of all citizens,” stated Brigadier General Puro.

Investigating Patterns of Inconsistency

Transparency and Accountability in Public Service

Let’s Promote Integrity and Trust

What do you think are the most effective ways to combat corruption and foster greater transparency in government processes?