spanish Prosecutors Seek Prison Time for Four Over Exploitation adn Child Pornography Charges

Madrid,spain – Spanish prosecutors are seeking notable prison sentences for four individuals accused of serious offenses,including the recording of intimate images without consent and the distribution of child pornography,involving two young women. Among the accused are Andrés García, Ferrán Ruiz, and Juan rodríguez, with further charges brought against another individual, Asencio. The case centers around events that allegedly occured in a private cabin in Mogán, gran Canaria, on June 15, 2023.

According to the prosecution’s account, the four defendants where present with two girls, aged 16 and 18. Crucially, the prosecution asserts that all defendants “had full knowledge” of the 16-year-old’s age, having confirmed it directly.

The indictment details that ferrán Ruiz and Juan Rodríguez allegedly engaged in sexual relations with the 16-year-old, while Andrés García allegedly had sexual relations with the 18-year-old. Following these encounters, Ferrán Ruiz is accused of recording the sexual relations using a mobile device without the consent of those involved. He then passed the device to Juan Rodríguez, who allegedly continued to film and photograph the encounter.The prosecution further alleges that after the sexual relations concluded, Ferrán Ruiz, Juan Rodríguez, and Andrés García deliberately shared these photographs and recordings with third parties.

In a separate incident on June 21, 2023, Asencio, reportedly aware of the illicit recordings made by the other defendants, allegedly sought out Juan Rodríguez and requested access to the recordings. The prosecution states that Asencio received the recording and afterward shared it with a third party, thereby further undermining the victims’ privacy.

The distressing aftermath of these alleged actions has resulted in both the 16-year-old and the 18-year-old girls reportedly suffering from “posttraumatic stress disorder associated with anxious depressive symptoms.”

Sentencing Demands:

For Andrés García, Ferrán Ruiz, and Juan Rodríguez, the Prosecutor’s Office is seeking a prison sentence of 4 years and 7 months. This includes a special disqualification from exercising the right of passive suffrage during the period of thier sentence. Furthermore, the prosecution requests a strict prohibition for these three individuals from approaching the two victims.This prohibition mandates maintaining a distance of at least 500 meters from their homes, workplaces, or any other frequented locations, as well as a ban on any form of communication for a period of six years.

Regarding Asencio, the prosecution is requesting a prison sentence of two years and six months, along with a special disqualification for the exercise of the right of passive suffrage during the conviction period. Additionally, Asencio is facing a demand for 5,000 euros in compensation to each of the victims.

While details regarding any involvement or official statements from Real Madrid, where one of the accused, Asencio, is reportedly a significant player for coach Xabi Alonso, have not yet been disclosed, it is speculated that the club’s legal team is actively addressing the situation. Asencio, a homegrown talent, has accumulated 46 appearances for the club and contributed to winning the Intercontinental Cup in 2025.

What specific articles within Organic Law 3/2018 are being used to prosecute Player X?

Real Madrid Player Faces Prison Sentence Over Revenge Porn Scandal

The Allegations: What Happened?

A prominent Real Madrid player,currently identified only as “Player X” pending legal proceedings,is facing a potential prison sentence in Spain following allegations of creating and distributing intimate images and videos of his former partner without her consent. This constitutes a serious offense under Spanish law, specifically relating to revenge porn and violations of privacy. The case, which has garnered meaningful media attention, centers around accusations that Player X recorded explicit content during thier relationship and later shared it online after their separation.

The alleged victim came forward with a formal complaint to the Spanish authorities in July 2025, providing evidence including screenshots and witness testimonies. The investigation, led by the Guardia CivilS cybercrime unit, quickly escalated, leading to Player X being formally charged. Key terms related to this case include: digital abuse, image-based sexual abuse, non-consensual pornography, and cyber harassment.

Spanish Law & penalties for Revenge Porn

Spain has increasingly stringent laws regarding digital privacy and the non-consensual sharing of intimate images. The relevant legislation falls under the Organic Law 3/2018, which amended the Penal Code to specifically criminalize revenge porn.

Here’s a breakdown of potential penalties:

Prison Sentence: Depending on the severity and scope of the offense, Player X could face a prison sentence ranging from 1 to 3 years.

Fines: Substantial fines can be levied, potentially reaching tens of thousands of euros.

restraining Order: A restraining order preventing any contact with the victim is almost certain.

Criminal Record: A conviction will result in a criminal record, impacting future opportunities.

Civil Lawsuits: The victim can also pursue a separate civil lawsuit seeking financial compensation for damages, including emotional distress and reputational harm.

The prosecution will likely argue that Player X acted with malicious intent, causing significant emotional and psychological harm to the victim. The defense is expected to argue a lack of intent or challenge the authenticity of the evidence. Cybersecurity and digital forensics will play a crucial role in the trial.

Sponsorship Deals: Major sponsors are likely to suspend or terminate endorsement contracts. Brand reputation is paramount for these companies.

Team Suspension: Real Madrid could suspend Player X from team activities pending the outcome of the trial.

International reputation: The scandal damages not only Player X’s reputation but also potentially the image of la Liga and Spanish football.

Transfer Market Value: His market value will undoubtedly plummet, making a future transfer difficult.

This case highlights the growing awareness of athlete misconduct and the increasing scrutiny faced by high-profile individuals in the digital age.

2022 – UK Footballer: A professional footballer in the UK received a suspended sentence for sharing explicit images of his ex-girlfriend.

2023 – US Basketball Player: A US basketball player faced civil lawsuits and public backlash after a similar incident.

2024 – German Footballer: A German footballer was fined and issued a warning after admitting to sharing private photos.

These precedents demonstrate a global trend towards stricter enforcement of laws protecting digital privacy and holding perpetrators accountable for online abuse. The legal landscape surrounding digital consent is constantly evolving.

Resources for Victims of Revenge Porn

If you or someone you know is a victim of revenge porn or image-based sexual abuse, here are some resources:

Cyber Civil Rights Initiative (CCRI): https://cybercivilrights.org/

National Network to End Domestic Violence (NNEDV): https://nnedv.org/

Digital Wellness Lab: https://digitalwellnesslab.org/

Spanish National Police – Cybercrime Unit: Report incidents directly to the authorities.

The Role of Social Media Platforms

Social media platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook are frequently enough the vehicles through which non-consensual intimate images are disseminated. These platforms are under increasing pressure to proactively remove such content and

EU Court Ruling on Migration Fuels Sovereignty Debate & ‘Legal Gambling’ Fears – Breaking News

Brussels, Belgium – A landmark ruling by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) regarding the designation of “safe countries of origin” is sending shockwaves through the European Union, igniting a fierce debate over national sovereignty, migration policy, and the perceived influence of judicial activism. The decision, announced today, is already being labeled as a potential “collapse” of return systems and a victory for ideological agendas over practical security concerns. This is a breaking news story with significant SEO implications for understanding EU policy.

ECJ Tightens Standards for ‘Safe Countries’ – What Changed?

The ECJ ruled that EU member states can only designate countries as “safe” if they can demonstrate, with “transparent and verifiable” evidence, that the entire population – including vulnerable groups – is genuinely safe. This goes beyond previous standards, which allowed for assessments based on general conditions. The ruling stems from challenges to national deportation policies, specifically concerning the return of individuals to countries previously considered safe. Critics argue this new standard is virtually impossible to meet, effectively opening the door to a flood of asylum claims and hindering deportation efforts.

This decision echoes concerns voiced during the Brexit debate, where a key motivation for the UK’s departure was a desire to escape the jurisdiction of the ECJ and its perceived overreach into national affairs. As one former British official noted, the fear was that the ECJ would continually “bend” national laws to align with a broader EU agenda. The current ruling appears to validate those anxieties for many.

‘Alien and Fire-Threatening!’ – Outcry from EU Parliamentarian

Petra Steger, a Member of the European Parliament (MEP) representing the Freedom of EU party, delivered a scathing critique of the ECJ’s decision. “This is a clear step back for every effective migration policy,” Steger stated. “It will finally become a ‘legal gambling’ situation. Now, absolute security must be guaranteed for every possible minority – what does that mean in practice? Not a single country in the world will ever be considered safe!”

Steger’s concerns highlight a growing sentiment that the ECJ is increasingly acting as a political body, prioritizing ideological considerations over the security and practical needs of member states. She warned that if criminals and asylum fraudsters can exploit this new case law, the entire return system will be overwhelmed.

The ‘March Through the Institutions’ – A Deeper Trend?

The controversy surrounding the ECJ ruling is not an isolated incident. Critics point to a broader trend of judicial activism within EU institutions, alleging a deliberate “march through the institutions” by left-leaning ideologues seeking to reshape European society from the top down. This perspective suggests that unelected judges are increasingly dictating policy agendas, circumventing the democratic will of the majority population. This isn’t just about migration; it’s about the fundamental balance of power within the EU.

Evergreen Context: The Role of Courts in Shaping Policy – Historically, courts have played a crucial role in interpreting laws and protecting fundamental rights. However, the increasing politicization of judicial appointments and the expansion of judicial review have raised concerns about the potential for courts to overstep their boundaries and engage in policy-making. This debate is not unique to the EU; it’s a global phenomenon with significant implications for democratic governance.

Beyond the Headlines: What Does This Mean for the Future?

The ECJ’s ruling is likely to have far-reaching consequences for EU migration policy. Member states will face increased legal challenges to deportation orders, and the criteria for granting asylum may become more lenient. This could lead to a surge in migration flows, placing further strain on social welfare systems and exacerbating existing tensions. The ruling also raises fundamental questions about the future of national sovereignty within the EU and the role of the ECJ in shaping European policy. The debate is far from over, and the coming months will likely see further legal battles and political maneuvering as member states grapple with the implications of this landmark decision. Stay tuned to Archyde for continued Google News updates and in-depth analysis.

For readers seeking a deeper understanding of EU law and migration policy, Archyde offers a comprehensive archive of articles and expert commentary. Explore our resources to stay informed and engaged in the critical conversations shaping the future of Europe.

Venezuelan Little League Team Denied U.S. Visas, Citing national Security Concerns

Easley, SC – A young baseball team from Maracaibo, Venezuela, the Cacique Mara, has been barred from competing in the Senior League World Series after being denied U.S. travel visas. the team secured their spot in the international tournament by winning the Latin American qualifier rounds last month, but their dreams of competing on American soil have been dashed due to what immigration officials have cited as national security reasons.

The U.S. government’s current travel proclamation,signed in June,imposes bans or partial bans on citizens from 19 countries,including Venezuela,citing national security. While exemptions exist for athletes participating in major sporting events like the World Cup or Olympics, at the discretion of the secretary of State, the Cacique Mara team’s submission was reportedly rejected.

A state Department spokesperson reiterated their policy of granting “national interest exceptions” for qualified athletes on a case-by-case basis, while also recommending applicants apply “well in advance of their anticipated travel date.” However, this advice presents a logistical paradox for teams needing to secure a tournament spot before they can apply for visas to attend it.

Kendry Gutiérrez, president of the cacique Mara Little League, expressed the team’s profound disappointment, stating, “All they know how to do is play baseball. They don’t represent any threat; they are 15-year-old kids who wont to win the World Cup.”

This decision raises critical questions about the U.S.’s commitment to international sporting diplomacy. Will athletes from countries like Iran, Cuba, and Venezuela truly be permitted to participate in future major events, such as the 2026 World Cup soccer games or the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles? Fortunately, two other Venezuelan Little League teams from Valencia and Barquisimeto were granted visas to participate in similar events, highlighting the inconsistency in these rulings.

The exclusion of these young athletes is especially disheartening given the widely recognized role of international sports in fostering mutual respect and understanding across borders. The Senior League World Series, a platform designed to celebrate global youth athletic achievement, has been marred by this decision, leaving a group of talented teenagers denied the possibility to showcase their passion and skill on an international stage.

Evergreen Insight:

The incident involving the Cacique mara team underscores a persistent challenge in international sports: the intersection of geopolitical policies and the essential desire for athletic competition and cultural exchange. While national security is a legitimate concern for any government, the application of such policies to youth sporting events can have a profound impact on inspiring international goodwill and providing invaluable life experiences for young athletes.

As the global landscape continues to evolve, finding a balance between security protocols and the unifying power of sports remains a crucial endeavor.International organizations and national governments alike must strive for clarity, consistency, and a thoughtful approach to visa processes for athletes, ensuring that the spirit of fair play and global camaraderie is not compromised by bureaucratic hurdles. The dream of international competition should be accessible to young athletes who have earned their place through dedication and talent,regardless of their nationality.

What role do parental expectations play in creating unhealthy pressure for young athletes, as exemplified by the events in Harmony Creek?

Little League Dreams Shattered: A Town Grapples with Loss

The Unexpected Turn in Harmony Creek

Harmony Creek, Ohio, a town synonymous with Friday night lights and youthful athletic ambition, is reeling. The Harmony Creek Hawks, a Little League team poised for a state championship run, saw their season – and for some, a larger dream – abruptly end with a devastating 8-0 loss in the regional semi-finals. While losing is part of sports, the circumstances surrounding the defeat have left the community questioning not just the game, but the pressures placed on young athletes. This isn’t just about a Little League loss; it’s about a community identity shaken.

Beyond the Scoreboard: Understanding the Impact

The Hawks weren’t just any team. They were a collection of players who had grown up together, dominating local leagues for years. Their success fueled town pride and attracted significant attention. The loss has triggered a wave of emotions, extending far beyond the players themselves.

Parental Disappointment: Many parents invested heavily – time,money,and emotional energy – into their children’s baseball careers. The sudden end has lead to feelings of grief and questioning.

Community Morale: harmony Creek’s identity is deeply intertwined with its sports programs. The Hawks’ defeat has created a palpable sense of loss and disappointment throughout the town. Local businesses,which benefited from increased traffic during games,are also feeling the impact.

Player Wellbeing: The pressure to perform,especially at a young age,can be immense. Several players are reportedly struggling with the emotional fallout of the loss, highlighting the importance of youth sports psychology.

This intense surroundings can lead to anxiety, depression, and even physical injuries. The concept of healthy competition is being lost in the pursuit of victory at all costs.

Prioritize Fun and Development: The primary goal of youth sports shoudl be to foster a love of the game and promote physical and emotional development.

Focus on Effort, Not Just Outcome: Encourage players to focus on their effort and improvement, rather than solely on winning or losing.

Promote Sportsmanship: Teach players the importance of respect, fair play, and graciousness in both victory and defeat.

support Mental Wellbeing: Provide access to resources and support for young athletes struggling with the emotional challenges of competition. Sports counseling is becoming increasingly vital.

Parent Education: Workshops and resources for parents can help them understand the importance of positive coaching and healthy expectations.

Real-World Examples & Case Studies

The case of the Harmony Creek Hawks echoes similar situations across the nation. In 2018, a Little League coach in California was investigated for verbally abusing players after a loss, highlighting the dangers of unchecked parental and coaching pressure. (Source: Los Angeles Times). Furthermore, studies by the Aspen Institute’s Project Play have consistently shown a correlation between early sports specialization and increased risk of burnout and injury. (Source: Aspen Institute Project Play). These examples underscore the need for a systemic shift in how we approach youth sports.

the “Little” in Little League: Remembering the Core values

The term “little” in Little League Baseball isn’t just about age. It’s about preserving the innocence and joy of the game.It’s about teaching valuable life lessons – teamwork, perseverance, and resilience – in a supportive and encouraging environment. Harmony Creek’s experience serves as a stark reminder that sometimes, the most significant victory isn