A New York judge weighed whether to remove Attorney General Letitia James as special prosecutor in a reopened Cornell University gang rape investigation following defense challenges over her public social media posts, while state lawyers defended her appointment amid ongoing scrutiny over campus sexual assault cases.
Acting Supreme Court Justice James Farrell heard more than an hour of oral arguments in Monticello, New York, focusing on a petition filed by Gillio Lopes, one of seven former Cornell University fraternity members accused in a high-profile civil lawsuit of sexual assault.
Gillio Lopes Challenges Attorney General Letitia James Over Public Statements
The legal challenge centers on a public statement James published on X on September 28. Three days after the post appeared, New York Governor Kathy Hochul issued an executive order naming James as special prosecutor to oversee the criminal inquiry.
CORNELL SEVEN 🚨 A big day in the case, both in court and on Netflix.@Conlin_Lauren is at the Sullivan County courthouse today for the first oral arguments to remove NY Attorney General Letitia James as special prosecutor in the Cornell Seven investigation.Attorney Andrew… pic.twitter.com/d8fYE6iEIE
The petition brought by the defense argues that James has unequivocally demonstrated a bias and a presumption of guilt against the defendants. Lopes has consistently denied sexually assaulting the plaintiff, who has been identified in court filings under the pseudonym Jane Doe.
What this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and unacceptable. I’m holding her in my heart and in my prayers. To her, and to all survivors: you’re not alone. We stand with you.
Letitia James, New York Attorney General
Stuart Bernstein, another lawyer representing Lopes, told the judge that James had publicly aligned herself with the complainant, making her appointment unviable as an independent prosecutor.
Before being appointed special prosecutor in the Cornell case, New York Attorney General Letitia James posted a message of support for Jane Doe on Facebook, calling what she had “been forced to endure” horrific and telling her, “We stand with you.”James was later questioned… https://t.co/vwzO0Dc1cZ pic.twitter.com/VDUsE3ScSh
The case heard by Judge James Farrell was filed in the state capital of Albany and argued in Monticello, located approximately 72 miles northwest of Manhattan. The proceeding ended without an immediate ruling from the judge.
Judge Farrell Questions Joinder Issues and Prosecutor Discretion
During the proceedings, Judge Farrell raised skeptical questions for both sides. He questioned Assistant Attorney General Kaitlin Vigars about whether prosecutors should make such statements while a case is active, though Vigars responded that prosecutors are not categorically prohibited from making public remarks.
Cornell Seven: The Fight to Remove Letitia James 🧵Media and attorneys are now waiting outside of the courtroom on the second-floor. Andrew Miltenberg and his team ( representing Gillio Lopes) just walked in and are hanging out in the hallway with everyone. I'm now hearing…
The judge also pressed the defense on a major procedural hurdle, noting that only one of the seven accused men had joined the petition. Farrell warned of potential chaos if multiple prosecutors handled separate defendants in the same multi-suspect case, and gave Lopes’ attorney until November 5 to submit additional papers addressing the positions of the other defendants.
Broader Scrutiny and Police Investigation Changes at Cornell University
The legal battle unfolds alongside intense campus and institutional scrutiny regarding how sexual assault allegations have been handled at Cornell. The Cornell Faculty Senate weighed a non-binding no-confidence vote concerning the university’s handling of the ongoing crisis of sexual assault, aimed at adding pressure to the administration as it attempts to shore up confidence that the campus is safe.
The civil lawsuit filed in September by Jane Doe alleges that she was plied with alcohol, given ketamine that left her too intoxicated to consent, and gang-raped at the Chi Phi fraternity house in Ithaca in October 2024. Tompkins County District Attorney Matthew Van Houten previously declined to bring charges in 2024, asserting that the initial statement Jane Doe provided described her participation in drug use and sexual conduct as voluntary, conscious, and consensual.
Amid these developments, Cornell announced that sexual assault survivors who choose to pursue criminal charges can now elect to have the New York State Police investigate their cases instead of the Cornell University Police Department.
What this young woman has been forced to endure is horrific and unacceptable. I’m holding her in my heart and in my prayers.To her, and to all survivors: you’re not alone. We stand with you.https://t.co/az4ViQwgy1
Meanwhile, another defendant in the civil lawsuit, Winston Lee, separately asked a Tompkins County court to bar James from participating in any grand jury proceedings, with a decision expected in that sealed matter on November 13. Another legal challenge has also been filed in Ithaca, where Cornell is located, though no arguments have been scheduled for that proceeding.
WATCH: “I expect the documentary to be one-sided, salacious. I'm sure we'll all want to watch it, but I also know that it won't be the whole truth.”CORNELL SEVEN: The full press conference is below via @lamag, but here's a short exchange where I ask Gillio Lopes' attorney… https://t.co/yozx55k3DU pic.twitter.com/kwU0XuFLS5
>
