The father of Britney Spears on a blue eye said that if it were not for him and his guardianship, the performer would probably already be dead:
“Not everyone will agree with me. But where would Britney be now without this tutelage? And I don’t know if she would still be alive.”
Photo: Social networks
Don’t everyone agree? Perhaps not all. But I, for one, share these doubts – perhaps Britney would have tumbled without guardianship.
Well justified!
In fact, the question is not whether Britney needed or did not need guardianship – that’s just where no one has any doubts. The question is why the loving daddy’s custody was such that Britney wanted to get out of it, and the court agreed with this.
If you, daddy Spears, are so cool, then why did you lose custody?
“For her protection, and also for the protection of the children, guardianship was a great tool. I think that without this, she would never have returned the children, ”- continues to convince Jamie Spears.
Where are the children now? They live with their father. How did Britney get them back?
I am frankly put into a stupor by such a substitution of concepts. Was Britney at risk without custody? Was. Was Jamie’s custody of Britney a boon? In my opinion, as well as in the opinion of the court, the performer herself and millions of other people, no.
Daddy’s guardianship was not a boon.
Why? And that’s a good question. And why did he raise his daughter in such a way that, in principle, she needed guardianship?
Is this what Daddy Spears doesn’t want to talk about?
Why am I? Oh yes, upset. I thought about it and I suggest you think: if something happened to you, to whom would you entrust guardianship over yourself? Are there people you would trust yourself to?
Who are these people to you?