During the Supreme Court’s hearing of the case related to commercial activities in the Margalla National Park, Chief Justice Qazi Faizaisa remarked that we were going to remove the restaurant, but the housing societies came here. Is it the job of the Ministry of Interior to take care of the National Park? Police, organizations will see the park after ending terrorism? Generals and bureaucrats have taken over the system of the country, Attorney General you have no idea how things are going.
A Supreme Court bench headed by Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa heard the case related to commercial activities in Margalla National Park.
The Chief Justice of Pakistan remarked that the Supreme Court ordered the protection of the Margalla National Park, a national asset. After the court order, the Chairperson Wildlife Board was removed from office. The work of the Ministry of Interior is to look after the matter of public order.
Justice Qazi Faiz Isa said that there was a serious violation of the order of the court to protect the national asset, an attempt was made to nullify the court decision by the government’s actions. Not the brother of the hotel owner? The cabinet secretary approved the summary of the removal of the wildlife board chairperson from the prime minister, what does the owner of the private hotel think of the cabinet secretary.
The Supreme Court immediately called Cabinet Secretary Kamran Ali Afzal along with Attorney General Mansoor Usman Awan and Monal Restaurant owner Luqman Ali Afzal and adjourned the case.
The Supreme Court sought the government’s response on the transfer of the Margalla Hills National Park to the Ministry of Home Affairs and the details of Pine City, a housing project on the Margalla Hills, while the Supreme Court stopped the dismissal of Chairperson Wildlife Board Rana Saeed from the Ministry of Wildlife Board. It also stopped the execution of the notification of subordination of the interior.
A case related to the change of Wildlife Board Management Office and Chairperson was heard in the Supreme Court.
The Chief Justice of Pakistan remarked that the Supreme Court ordered the protection of the Margalla National Park, a national asset. After the court order, the Chairperson Wildlife Board was removed from office. The work of the Ministry of Interior is to look after the matter of public order.
Justice Qazi Faiz Isa said that there was a serious violation of the order of the court to protect the national asset, an attempt was made to nullify the court decision by the government’s actions. Not the brother of the hotel owner? The cabinet secretary approved the summary of the removal of the wildlife board chairperson from the prime minister, what does the owner of the private hotel think of the cabinet secretary.
With its announcement, the Prosecutor’s Office of the Supreme Court announced the completion of the investigation into the wiretapping case.
As indicated in the relevant announcement, the preliminary examination was completed after two years and nine months from the upgrade of the investigation.
according to the announcement of the Supreme Court from the investigation “it cannot be incontrovertibly concluded that there was absolutely no involvement with the spy software predator or any other similar software of a state agency, namely the National Intelligence Service (EYP), the Anti-Terrorist (D.A.E. .EB) and more generally of ELAS (Ministry of Citizen Protection) or any government official”.
At the same time, there were “sufficient indications at this stage for the initiation of criminal prosecution against certain legal representatives and real owners of companies, for criminal acts, such as the violation of the privacy of telephone communication, etc.”
Read also
Fire in Evia: Second firefighter with burns at the Health Center, winds make the work difficult
The coronavirus “gallops” during the summer: Increased hospitalizations, +99% viral load in Patras
2024 Olympics: Men’s triathlon postponed, Seine waters polluted
Weather: It’s still hot today, when it cools down, the forecast for Patras
For two hundredths of a second, Christou is off the podium
The cabinet is meeting today: The agenda, the messages
Interventions begin at the Nursing Home: Works to prevent rain from falling
Controls in the surveillance zone for the plague and clinical investigations are ongoing throughout the Region of Western Greece
#Areios #Pagos #report #wiretapping
The Head of the Supreme Court Supervisory Body (Bawas MA) Sugiyanto said that his party had not received any complaints regarding the acquittal decision issued by the panel of judges at the Surabaya District Court (PN) against Gregorius Ronald Tannur, the defendant in the murder of Dini Sera Afrianti.
“Bawas has not received any complaints regarding the decision so far,” he told Media Indonesia, Tuesday (30/7).
He explained that if they have received a complaint, Bawas MA will examine whether there are indications of violations of the Code of Ethics and Guidelines for Judges’ Conduct (KEPPH) from the decision-making process. If there are indications of violations of KEPPH, Sugiyanto said that his party will send an inspection team.
“On the other hand, if the results of the review do not indicate violations of the KEPPH and are purely related to judicial technicalities or the substance of the decision, Bawas cannot enter to conduct an investigation,” explained Sugiyanto.
According to him, this is because court decisions are not an ethical area, but rather purely a legal area.
Unlike Bawas MA, the Judicial Commission (KY) has actually taken earlier steps to investigate the Surabaya District Court’s decision by deploying an investigation team. Member and spokesperson of KY, Mukti Fajar Nur Dewata said that his party had also received a report from Dini’s family accompanied by member of the Indonesian House of Representatives Rieke Diah Pitaloka, yesterday.
“If followed up, then an examination will be carried out on the reporter, witnesses, and finally on the panel of judges,” said Mukti. (Tri/Z-7)
#Bawas #Received #Complaint #Ronald #Tannurs #Acquittal #Verdict