Why Early Election Night Results Skew Republican

As the nation watches the 2026 midterm elections unfold, control of the House of Representatives and the Senate hangs in the balance, with Republicans defending slim majorities in both chambers. Axios reported that early returns on election night can often paint a misleading picture of the final outcome. In each national election since 2018, the House and Senate votes counted by 9 p.m. ET have skewed significantly more Republican than the final tallies.

This early red lean is largely a matter of geography and voting methods. Fast-counting, right-leaning states report their numbers first, while states that rely heavily on mail-in ballots or take longer to process votes report later. For instance, Axios noted that at 9 p.m. on election night in 2022, Florida alone accounted for 40% of all Senate votes counted nationwide.

The Associated Press did not call control of the House until seven or eight days after Election Day in each of the past three elections. US News reported that all 435 House seats, one-third of the Senate, and 36 governorships are up for grabs. In the Senate, Democrats need a net gain of four seats for a majority, while they need to flip three seats in the House.

The Geography of Early Returns and the Red Mirage

Different states follow distinct tabulation patterns based on which ballots and counties they process first. States that prioritize early and mail-in votes tend to start bluer than they finish. Conversely, states that count Election Day votes first start out looking much redder.

Why Early Election Night Results Skew Republican
Photo: CBS News

Historical data illustrates how dramatic these shifts can be. In Ohio during the 2024 cycle, Sherrod Brown and Bernie Moreno were tied at 9 p.m. with half the votes counted, but Moreno ultimately won by four points. In Nebraska in 2024, independent candidate Dan Osborn held a lead over Senator Deb Fischer at 11 p.m., though Fischer eventually secured a seven-point victory. Back in 2018, Beto O’Rourke led Ted Cruz at 9 p.m. with nearly half of Texas counted, yet Cruz won by three points. Similarly, in 2020, Kansas Republican Roger Marshall trailed by eight points at 9 p.m. before winning by double digits.

Michigan has demonstrated a capacity to swing in multiple directions over the course of a single evening. In 2024, Elissa Slotkin led Mike Rogers by 13 points at 9 p.m., fell behind by three points at midnight, and ultimately won the contest by less than half a point. On the other hand, states like Maine start red and count slowly; in 2020, Susan Collins led by 18 points at 11 p.m. with only 16% of the vote counted, and she eventually won by nine points.

Alaska represents the slowest count in the nation and starts out redder. In 2020, Senator Dan Sullivan led by 28 points at 6 a.m. ET with 37% of the vote counted, finishing with a 13-point victory. Alaska accepts domestic ballots up to 10 days after Election Day if postmarked on time, and if no candidate wins a majority of first choices, the state will run its ranked-choice tally on Nov. 18.

Why Early Election Night Results Skew Republican
Photo: Usnews

Timeline of Poll Closings and Shift Triumphs

Tracking the results requires a close eye on the clock as polls close across different time zones. The sequence begins at 6 p.m. ET in parts of Indiana and Kentucky, providing the earliest House returns. By 7 p.m. ET, key Senate states such as Georgia, South Carolina, and most of Florida and New Hampshire close their polls.

ET. The political situation shifts at 11 p.m. At this point, the early Republican tilt typically begins to fade. By 6 a.m. Wednesday, the national House count remains two to three points more Republican than the final tally because states like California, Washington, and Oregon take days to process their ballots. Alaska closes its final polls around 1 a.m. Wednesday, though counting continues for days afterward.

Delay Breeds Misinformation About Election Integrity

The lag between casting a ballot and knowing the final outcome often creates an information vacuum. The Guardian reported that this delay can be exploited by partisan actors seeking to spread misinformation about the integrity of elections. Lawrence Norden, vice president of the Elections and Government Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, emphasized the importance of letting the established administrative process unfold without yielding to unfounded claims of fraud.

Federal and local election officials have maintained that strict checks and balances remain in place across the country. William Gates, executive director of Arizona State University’s Mechanics of Democracy Laboratory, noted that close elections naturally invite intense scrutiny and external attacks simply because margins are tight, not because the counting mechanisms are flawed. Meanwhile, the Department of Justice plans to deploy 1,000 federal election monitors, which it says is its largest number in its history, to observe and ensure compliance with federal law.

As vote processing continues through the week, the MIT Election Data and Science Lab noted that the last U.S. House race of the 2024 cycle was not officially called until Dec. 3. Voters awaiting the final composition of the 2026 Congress will likely need to exercise patience as local election workers process remaining absentee and mail-in ballots.

Photo of author

Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief

Editor-in-Chief Prize-winning journalist with over 20 years of international news experience. Alexandra leads the editorial team, ensuring every story meets the highest standards of accuracy and journalistic integrity.

Strokes in Young Adults: Why Cases Are Rising Before 55

Over 14,000 new condominiums remain unsold in Metro Vancouver