Huawei Technologies faces a key witness testimony concerning the alleged theft of trade secrets from Japanese rival Fujitsu, as its landmark criminal racketeering trial enters its second day of testimony in a Brooklyn, New York federal court.
The proceedings at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York follow opening statements where a U.S. government lawyer told federal jurors that Huawei engaged in criminal activities to achieve “growth at any cost.” Conversely, a lawyer for the company contended that the employee who photographed Fujitsu networking equipment acted independently.
According to coverage, the multi-count indictment encompasses 12 total charges, including allegations that Huawei stole technology, plotted to steal U.S. trade secrets, and committed wire and bank fraud. Prosecutors allege that Huawei maintained a dedicated in-house unit known as the Competition Management Group to systematically acquire rival technology. The indictment cites multiple episodes, including a 2013 incident involving a Huawei employee carrying a component from a mobile-testing robot out of a research lab run by U.S. carrier T-Mobile.
### Broader Indictment and Sanctions Violations
Beyond intellectual property claims, the federal case details accusations regarding sanctions evasions. Prosecutors state that Huawei and certain subsidiaries conducted business in North Korea and Iran, utilizing code names such as “A2” for Iran and “A9” for North Korea while allegedly deceiving financial institutions. Additional allegations accuse Huawei of using a Hong Kong shell company named Skycom to sell equipment to Iran, and charge chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou with fraud for allegedly misleading HSBC about those business dealings.
Meng was arrested in Canada in late 2018 on a U.S. extradition request, igniting diplomatic friction. She was released in September 2021 following a prisoner swap that allowed her to return to China, after which the U.S. dropped its extradition request and dismissed the fraud charges against her.
### Legal Defense and Geopolitical Context
Huawei has consistently denied wrongdoing, describing the U.S. government’s case as “demonstrably false” and asserting that its business success stems from long-term investment in innovation and respect for intellectual property. In court filings, defense lawyers sought a dismissal, arguing that the allegations are overly broad, attempt to stretch American legal authority beyond national borders, and serve as leverage in broader trade disputes between Washington and Beijing.
The trial itself arrives more than eight years after Huawei was initially indicted during the first term of U.S. President Donald Trump, delayed by pandemic-related scheduling hurdles and the extensive volume of evidence. The case also unfolds approximately 10 days before a planned visit to the United States by Chinese President Xi Jinping, sharpening existing bilateral tensions.
While Huawei remains the world’s largest supplier of wireless telecom network equipment, it has faced severe western restrictions. The company is barred from selling equipment to U.S. carriers over national security concerns, a stance mirrored by allies including Britain and Canada. U.S. sanctions and placement on the Commerce Department’s Entity List have cut Huawei off from essential American processor chips, pushing the firm to accelerate its own domestic chipmaking capabilities amid surging global demand for artificial intelligence microprocessors.
Federal prosecutors have estimated that proving the racketeering and fraud case could require up to three months of court proceedings.
Worth a look
