Responsible and constructive political praxis






© Telam


Argentine politics encounters serious problems in expressing the gray that live between the actions worthy of the most critical moments of the campaign and the silence. This contributes to the fact that the substantive issue and the proposal cease to be of interest, and we can focus exclusively on who is on one side and who is on the other, to see how we can take advantage of it. And above all, this nullifies the possibility of dialogue, the first step for any agreement.

This praxis gone to extremes is less and less a phenomenon of certain isolated actors and, more and more, something popular in the political leadership. Those who support this seem to pose a game where whoever has a vocation for power must necessarily represent in this way. And they are being heard. Their ranks are swelled by the least expected actors. There is an inertia towards an “everyone”.

International Women’s Day: 114 years have passed and there are still unanswered claims

In this context, the work for gender equality brings a parenthesis to the political dynamics described. It brings the partisan spaces closer, puts them in dialogue and attends to something that does not usually happen: the substance of the issue.

In order to reach the gains achieved in terms of recognition and access to Women rights, various actors and from different political spaces came together to build majorities. To dialogue and seek agreements in the face of a real problem of citizenship. The latter we can safely affirm. The relevance and opportunity of the topic is not determined from the solitude of a bank or from an office in the face of the historical social mobilization that guarantees it on the agenda.

The feminist deed, its capacity for extensive and intense militancy, which forcefully and intelligently broke down the multiple barriers to become a popular tide,

For these effects, unfortunately as rare as they are virtuous, there are several causes. One of them is citizen power. The feminist deed, its capacity for extensive and intense militancy, which forcefully and intelligently broke down the multiple barriers to become a popular tide, are the first motionless motor of this much healthier political mechanism. That convinces or puts pressure on the actors with decision-making power to work towards society, without claiming the ability to generate responses individually but collectively, seeking legitimacy in their decisions, thinking in the long term, talking to reaching consensus, modifying proposals, addressing multiple aspects of the complex issue and playing the game of reasons to provide answers.

Another determining factor in this scenario is the rarity of political spaces that have as a binder a narrative forged in the heat of these convictions. And I have the pride and responsibility of being part of one: The Argentine Generation. Those of us who make La Generación are united in an essential way by the construction of an alternative country marked by the understanding that all the elected representatives of our country defend different interests, perhaps conflicting, but always legitimate. The State of the State places us in a scenario where we must understand that we have neither the time nor the economic resources to see in the other something other than a valid interlocutor for the conversations that put us definitively on the path of solving the great problems. of Argentina.

*Secretary of the National University Scalabrini Ortiz de San Isidro.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.