In the CPU market, AMD’s Ryzen has already made friends suffer, and in the graphics card market, AMD has also usedRDNA graphics cards are on the right track, but compared with NVIDIA, they are still not dominant overall and are temporarily at the disadvantage.
How to convince gamers to buy AMD’s Radeon graphics cards? AMD game director Frank Azor put forward a strong reason, that is, AMD graphics cards are more cost-effective, even 89% higher than NVIDIA graphics cards, and the advantages are very obvious.
In the comparison table published by Frank Azor, in addition to comparing the gaps in performance, price, and power consumption, two comprehensive evaluation indicators are also introduced. One is cost performance, that is, perf/$, and the other is fps/watt, which is understandable. is the energy consumption ratio.
AMD divided the two graphics cards into 4 levels: 1080p medium quality, 1080p highest quality, 1440p highest quality and 4K highest quality, and compared the cost performance and energy consumption ratio data of different levels of graphics cards.
In the chart, in the comparison between the flagship RX 6950 XT and the RTX 3090, the RX 6950 XT is 80% more cost-effective, and its energy consumption ratio is 22% ahead. The cost performance of other graphics cards ranges from 8% to more than 50%. The biggest gap is the RX 6400 compared to the GTX 1050 Ti, which is 89% more cost-effective and 122% higher than the energy consumption ratio.
Further reading: