The defense of the first accused in the case known in the media as the “Meadow massacre”, in which 3 children were killed, after their mother killed them at the instigation of her husband and his second wife, and forcing her to do so, demanded that the material and moral element of the accused be absent during the crime, because she was under Pressure and coercion by the second and third defendants, who tortured her, cut off her ear and put a caustic substance in her eye that made her blind..
The defendant’s defense added, during his pleading before the court, that the evidence derived from the psychiatric report was invalid, due to its failure to prove her injury suffered by the second and third defendants, and the failure to determine the criminal responsibility of the accused at the time of the accident due to the lack of identification of her psychological state, explaining that that report should have been It should explain the mental state of the accused to be evidence that the accused was under pressure and coercion by the second and third defendants.
The details of that incident began with the Marj Police Department’s detectives receiving a report from a woman who owned the property in which the crime took place, stating that his wife’s husband had been forced to kill her three children, and after the policemen moved to the scene, it was confirmed that the report was true..
The accused and his wife were arrested, and all necessary legal measures were taken, and the necessary report of the incident was issued, and the Public Prosecution Office, which took over the investigation, was notified, and ordered the perpetrators to be referred to the Criminal Court after the investigations were completed..