Jokowi Defamation: Lawyer Urges Police Action

Jokowi‘s Legal Team Urges Swift Action in Diploma Defamation Case

Jakarta – Attorneys for Indonesian President Joko Widodo, also known as Jokowi, are intensifying pressure on the Jakarta Metropolitan Police to accelerate their investigation into allegations of diploma forgery and related defamation. Rivai Kusumanegara,one of Jokowi’s lawyers,specifically requested that the police determine whether the case merits further investigation or should be dismissed.

Kusumanegara voiced concerns that the accusations surrounding Jokowi’s diploma have moved beyond a search for truth, suggesting they are now politically motivated to destabilize the President’s management.

Mounting Pressure for Resolution

Speaking at a press conference in Central Jakarta on Sunday, June 15, 2025, Kusumanegara stated, “We, as Mr. Jokowi’s legal representatives, urge the Metro Jaya Regional Police to decisively conclude the investigation we initiated two months ago, determining whether it should proceed to a formal investigation or be halted.”

He emphasized the right of a reporter to demand the completion of this legal process. Kusumanegara expressed confidence in the strength of their evidence against those suspected of defaming Jokowi.

“We believe that the collected evidence, including documents, witness statements, expert opinions, and directives, warrants elevating our report with the Jakarta Metropolitan Police to the investigation stage,” he asserted.

Call for Impartiality

Another attorney for Jokowi, Yakup Hasibuan, echoed his colleague’s sentiments, stating that they are awaiting updates from the Jakarta Metropolitan Police and hope for a swift resolution.Hasibuan stressed the importance of an impartial investigation, free from external influence.

“We respectfully request that the Jakarta Metropolitan Police continue to pursue our reports, understanding that this process requires time. It is our hope that no external party interferes, ensuring a transparent and unbiased outcome,” hasibuan said.

He further added, “If criminal elements are present, we urge immediate action.”

The Role of Legal Proceedings

The case highlights the critical role that legal proceedings play in addressing allegations against public figures. The careful gathering of evidence, the presentation of witness testimonies, and the impartial evaluation by law enforcement are all essential to ensuring justice and maintaining public trust.

Do you think the police will remain impartial in this investigation? What impact could this case have on Indonesian politics?

Understanding Defamation and Its Impact

Defamation, at its core, involves damaging the reputation of an individual or entity through false statements. In today’s digital age, defamation can spread rapidly, causing significant harm. Legal frameworks are in place worldwide to address defamation, balancing freedom of speech with the need to protect individual reputations.

The legal process in defamation cases generally involves proving that a false statement was made,that it was communicated to others,and that it caused harm. Public figures often face a higher burden of proof, as they must also demonstrate that the statement was made with actual malice, meaning the publisher knew it was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information and should not be considered legal advice. Consult with a qualified legal professional for advice tailored to your specific situation.

Key Elements of a Defamation Case

Element	Description
False Statement	The statement must be demonstrably false and not merely an opinion.
Publication	The statement must be communicated to at least one other person.
Harm	The statement must cause harm to the reputation of the person or entity being defamed.
Malice (for public figures)	The statement must be made with knowledge of its falsity or with reckless disregard for the truth.

Frequently Asked Questions

• What specific role are Jokowi’s lawyers requesting from the police?

  Jokowi’s legal team has explicitly asked the Jakarta Metropolitan Police to decisively conclude their investigation into the alleged diploma forgery and defamation, determining whether it should proceed to a formal investigation or be dismissed.

• Why is the role of the police investigation so vital in this case?

  The investigation is vital because jokowi’s lawyers argue that the accusations are politically motivated and designed to destabilize his administration.An impartial and thorough investigation is essential to ensure justice and maintain public trust.

• What evidence are Jokowi’s lawyers presenting to support their claims about the role of defamation?

  Jokowi’s legal team has asserted they possess substantial evidence, including documents, witness testimonies, expert opinions, and directives, which they believe justify escalating the case to a formal investigation.

• Can the media play a role in influencing the investigation’s direction?

  Yes, the media plays a role in shaping public opinion, which can indirectly influence the investigation. By disseminating information about the case,the media can affect how the public perceives the allegations and the actions of all parties involved.

• What is the potential role of expert statements in determining the outcome of the case?

  Expert statements are considered significant as they provide professional analysis that could either support or refute the claims of defamation and diploma forgery, thereby influencing the direction and outcome of the investigation.

Share your thoughts and comments below. How do you perceive the role of legal proceedings in cases involving public figures?

What are the specific legal articles within the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and law Number 11 of 2008 (ITE Law) that are being used in President Jokowi’s defamation case?

Jokowi Defamation Case: Lawyer Urges Police Action

The legal landscape surrounding allegations against President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) is heating up. Recent developments involving accusations of defamation and/or slander have prompted calls for decisive action from legal representatives.This article delves into the specifics of the case, the legal ramifications, and the implications for the involved parties. Key terms such as “defamation,” “slander,” “criminal code,” and “Jokowi” are central to understanding this complex situation. Stay informed about the latest updates concerning the Jokowi defamation examination.

The Allegations: Details of the Accusations

At the heart of the matter are allegations of defamation and slander directed towards President Jokowi. These accusations stem from claims related to his educational background, specifically targeting the authenticity of his diploma. These accusations are viewed by some as attempts to undermine Jokowi’s reputation. The alleged offenses fall under the purview of Indonesia’s Criminal Code (KUHP).

The Legal Framework: Laws Invoked in the Case

The legal proceedings are specifically referencing several key articles within the Criminal Code and related laws pertaining to information and electronic transactions. Understanding these legal pillars is crucial.

Relevant articles in the Criminal Code (KUHP)

The legal team representing jokowi has cited Article 310 and Article 311 of the Criminal Code. These articles deal with defamation and slander, respectively, outlining the legal definition of these offenses and their potential penalties. Further investigation will define whether the current investigation complies with Indonesian law.

Law Number 11 of 2008 (ITE Law)

additionally, Article 35 in conjunction with Article 51 paragraph 1 of law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (ITE Law) has been invoked. The ITE Law covers the dissemination of information through electronic means, extending the reach of defamation and slander laws to online platforms.

Police Investigation: Current Status and Actions

The Metro Jaya Police are investigating the charges. Commissioner Ade Ary Syam Indradi, Head of Public Relations of the metro Jaya Police, confirmed that Jokowi has officially reported the allegations. The police are in the process of determining whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed with a formal investigation and potentially prosecute the individuals responsible.

The police will be looking for answers to define whether there is strong proof that the accused’s claims caused the defamation of President Jokowi.

The President’s Response and Legal Strategy

President Jokowi has expressed his feelings about the accusations, stating he feels pity but also considers the allegations “excessive,” (as reported in “[1]”). This reveals his perception of the gravity of the charges. The legal team is expected to strategize about how to defend the President based on these feelings.

Potential Outcomes and Ramifications

The outcome of this case could have notable impacts, potentially leading to:

• Criminal Charges: If the police find sufficient evidence, individuals could face criminal charges related to defamation and/or slander.
• Reputational Damage: A formal investigation and any subsequent legal action could further affect the reputations of all involved parties, including those making the initial accusations.
• Public Discourse Shift: the case could reshape public discourse around political allegations and the dissemination of information

Key Case Dates and Events

Stay tuned. Keep track of some of the most critical dates related to the case, including press releases and the announcement of major legal actions.

Here’s a simplified timeline (which will be updated as the case progresses):

Date	Event	Importance
[To be Updated]	Initial allegations made	Initiated the investigation
[To be Updated]	Jokowi’s legal team files a report against the accusers	Marks the official start of police investigations
[To be Updated]	Police begin gathering of evidence	Information gathering phase

Staying Informed about the Jokowi Defamation Case

To stay updated on the Jokowi defamation case, continue checking reputable news sources: Follow legal blogs, and academic journals reporting on Indonesian law. These sources furnish the most recent developments and legal analyses.

Keywords: Jokowi, defamation, slander, legal action, police investigation, Indonesia, Criminal Code, KUHP, ITE Law, President Jokowi, Kompas.id