He left our world more than ten years ago, the brilliant drama writer, leaving a large number of series that are still breathing through satellite channels, because they have the keys to breaking through the time barrier.
Recently, a famous media spoke about the marriage of the dramatic writer a few years before his departure from a young artist, by the way, his son witnessed the marriage contract, and after that, in one of the programs, his (second) wife was hosted, and she spoke with love about the details of her life with him, a few days ago the daughter of the great writer issued a severe statement The dialect completely refuses to allow anyone to approach her father’s emotional life, and asked (the media) to be content with only talking about his dramatic achievement.
Who gets to decide what is or isn’t said about celebrity lives? It is only forbidden to defame or claim.
The artist, Madiha Yousry, often talked about her divorced musician, Mohamed Fawzy, after his departure, and said that the secret of the divorce was his betrayal of her, and that she forgave him at first more than once, until his credit ran out, although he then married the artist Karima, who bore the title (Fatina Al-Maadi), However, Karima did not consider that Madiha entered the forbidden area.
From time to time, Shadia used to speak with great appreciation about her ex-husbands Imad Hamdi and Salah Zulfikar, and no one considered that she was invading privacy, also the musician Mahmoud Al-Sharif, who had announced his engagement to Umm Kulthum in 1946, and they were on their way to announce the marriage, but there are multiple factors This led to the suspension of the project, and Mahmoud Al-Sharif revealed a lot about the secret of the failure of marriage, whether in Umm Kulthum’s life or after her departure – he lived after 15 years – and I issued a book about him entitled (Me and the Torture and Umm Kulthum), and Umm Kulthum’s heirs did not object to the intrusion of the emotional side of her life .
Yes, what remains in the end is achievement. This is a fact. However, monitoring the personal aspect of public figures is a duty for all of us. Unfortunately, some believe that this is precisely what should be avoided or, at a minimum, obscured.
I remember that Mrs. Nahla al-Qudsi, the last wife of the musician Muhammad Abd al-Wahhab, was keen, a few years before her departure, to announce that she had burned all the emotional letters she exchanged with the great musician, before or after marriage. It is known that Abd al-Wahhab has a moral sense, meaning that his letters were worthy of circulation Mrs. Nahla said that out of love for Abdel Wahab, she put all these letters in a flask and drenched it with the beloved Parisian perfume of the great musician, and then set it on fire.
She justified this by saying: (I was afraid that these letters would reach the hands of the grandchildren), and she did not ask what would happen when the grandchildren discover that their grandfather was loving and also expresses his emotional feelings in words that are overflowing and sincere. On the other hand, the late lady Jihan Al-Sadat, did not find What prevents her from telling more than a recording of her emotional story with President Anwar Sadat, which began a few years before the outbreak of the 52nd Revolution, when Sadat was fond of Farid al-Atrash, like most young men of that time, and often sang to her in their private sessions his emotional songs, the president Gamal Abdel Nasser, the late journalist writer Shafiq Ahmed Ali documented about him in a book entitled (The Woman that Abdel Nasser loved), in which he told the story of his first love before his marriage to Mrs. Tahia Kazem. .
When we draw with words a portrait of a public figure, we search for all its practical and personal details, even emotional ones, and this is a responsibility and is never an invasion of privacy!!