Violence currently constitutes a public health problem and frequently falls on the most vulnerable members of the community, such as minors and women. A well-organized society provides people, through family and school socialization and the acquisition of moral conscience, integration mechanisms and emotional ties with other human beings that protect them from getting involved in destructive relationships.
Empathy, as a natural biological commandment, is the most powerful inhibitor against violence and cruelty. Unfortunately, there are some human beings who lack this empathic capacity to react positively to expressions of fear or pain expressed by other people and do not have a handbrake to regulate their destructive tendencies, without also expressing emotional discomfort ( guilt) for the harm inflicted.
Violent behavior is the result of the specific interaction of individual variables and situational factors. Perpetrators of destructive behavior typically have antisocial personalities, have suffered the humiliation of physical abuse, and have been exposed to the glorification of violence. Specifically, the absence of a father figure or secure attachment relationships encourages the acquisition of low self-esteem and hinders the ability to self-control to learn to modulate aggressive impulses. People who have had these problems in childhood do not develop empathy towards human suffering, may be emotionally insensitive towards others and tend to commit violent acts, especially if they resort to alcohol and drugs.
The influence of violent peers or habitual viewing of violent video games is important, especially when the intellectual level is low, the subjects have a dependent personality and have poorly internalized normative values in the family and at school. In short, violent young people have developed, from their family or close environment, a strategy to control the behavior of others based on resorting to violence; and they have also learned to become emotionally insensitive to its effects.
There are times when violent behavior is expressed in an impulsive way, modulated by anger, and other times when this violence is planned with emotional coldness and is due to the achievement of a specific objective (robbery, sex or revenge). Considering violent people as mentally ill supposes a premise that condemns the innocent and pardons the guilty, because it stigmatizes people with a mental disorder who have not done, nor will do, any harm; and mentally healthy people who did do it are considered irresponsible. Confusing evil with illness is a mistake. The psychiatrization of evil is neither nor should it be the answer.
Despite the social alarm raised, the majority of people affected by a mental disorder are not violent. However, there are patients who are not undergoing treatment (or have abandoned it) and who may adopt violent behavior. When the interpretation of the environment is defective as a result of delusional ideas or hallucinations, external reality can be perceived as a threat and one can react disproportionately, with intense fear or extreme violence.
Delusions, hallucinations, alcohol and drugs
Some people with a psychotic disorder lose touch with reality and may attribute hostile attitudes or intentions to others. In these cases, patients live under the yoke of an imaginary reality in which delusional ideas (persecution or jealousy), or threatening auditory hallucinations, dominate the will of those who suffer from them and restrict their freedom. The greatest risk, in these people, occurs at the time of the psychotic episode or when the disorder is not diagnosed. If patients do not recognize the disorder, abandon medication, consume alcohol or drugs and lack family, social or community support (social marginalization is a risk in itself), the probability of violent behavior increases considerably. But it is these circumstances, rather than the disorder itself, that facilitate their involvement in destructive behaviors.
If people with a serious mental disorder decompensate, they may resort to violence when they feel physically threatened (violence as defense), despised (violence as self-affirmation), or treated unfairly (violence as revenge). In these cases, violent behavior is an attempt to regulate very negative internal emotional states (humiliation, for example) and constitutes a way of coping with hallucinations or delusional ideas that can be overwhelming. However, people with a psychotic disorder are not especially violent. If anything, they are more likely to tend to harm themselves or commit suicide, especially if they abandon treatment.
In turn, addictions—especially alcohol and drug abuse and dependence—are a risk factor for violence, but there are many mediating circumstances. Not all heavy drinkers are violent, nor is violence carried out indiscriminately, but only on the most vulnerable victims. Alcohol abuse is dangerous in those subjects who already have the mood to attack. Previous attitudes of hostility and the predisposing effect of an impulsive personality or another mental disorder modulate the violent response induced by psychoactive substances, which can arise suddenly, unexpectedly and without relation to the victim. In reality, mental disorders and drug abuse constitute an explosive cocktail.
Risk and anticipation factors
The risk is accentuated if there is joint consumption of alcohol and stimulant drugs, such as cocaine, amphetamines or ecstasy. In these cases, involvement in violent behavior is facilitated because attitudes of extreme distrust, or persecutory or threatening ideas, can be triggered in the subjects, which generate deep emotional discomfort against those around them.
Many violent people do not have a mental disorder – that is, they do not have relevant cognitive or volitional dysfunctions – but they show personality alterations (of a psychopathic, paranoid or narcissistic type), they lack empathy and tolerance for frustration, they do not feel valued by others, they are fascinated by violence, they are impulsive and need to get involved in exciting experiences.
Violent behavior, like atmospheric changes, is not easy to predict. Once the first episode of violence has arisen, the probability of further episodes increases considerably. Therefore, the greater and more recent the history of attacks, the greater the probability of using violence as a form of interpersonal relationship. In general, what best predicts future violence is having developed previous violent behaviors, abusing alcohol or drugs, having weapons and having psychopathological problems, such as psychopathy, schizophrenia or delusional disorder, especially when it has not been established (or medical or psychological treatment has been abandoned.