The police recently received a report from a 25-year-old woman surnamed Mai, saying that she was suspected of being photographed secretly in Lei Jing Wan, Sai Wan River. The man who was with him approached the man surnamed Fan involved and entangled him on the ground. The police later arrived at the scene to check on him. On the mobile phone, it was found that although there were photos of different women on the phone, they were not leaking.
According to reports, a woman surnamed Mai and her “boyfriend” brought their dog to a restaurant in Sai Wan Ho. During this period, a man surnamed Fan approached, played with the Shiba Inu held by the female victim, and used his mobile phone to take pictures many times. Later, the “boyfriend” found that Fan Nan raised his mobile phone several times to take pictures. He suspected that Fan Nan could secretly photograph Mai Nv’s upper body, so he stopped the other party. Fan Nan then fled, and the “boyfriend” chased him down and subdued him. Mai Nv called the police for help, but the police found that Fan Nan’s mobile phone album contained only the photos of the victim’s dog.
Click the image below to view the photos of the Shiba Inu involved:
After the incident broke out, many netizens launched a “successful effort” to find out the true identity of the victim. Among them, some people found that Mai Nv was suspected to be singer Chloie, who had participated in ViuTV’s “Good Night Show archyde news Queen”. The man is suspected to be Wendi (Lu Wendi), the lead vocalist of the band ONE PROMISE. When Wendi replied to “Hong Kong 01” by his company Universal Music, he admitted that it was the male victim, and said that the online reports did not match the facts. He clarified that the police found and confirmed that Fan Nan’s phone call indeed contained eight photos of his girlfriends. But there was no photo of the dog, and he was not involved in assaults or beatings, so the police did not record his ID number.
Wendi replied to the full text of “Hong Kong 01”:
That day, I went to Lijingwan with my girlfriend and her Shiba Inu for dinner. We sat on the table of the restaurant by the sidewalk, facing each other, while the dog was sitting next to me (on the sidewalk).
Suddenly, a strange man approached us and started talking to us, including the puppy being well behaved, asking about the puppy’s age, breed and so on. Since the man was standing behind me at the time, I didn’t pay much attention to his actions. My girlfriend told me that the strange man had his hands around his chest and the phone in one hand. The camera was always facing his girlfriend and he pressed the button next to the phone, which made her very uneasy.
After the girlfriend found out that the strange man was behaving strangely, he began to be alert and suspicious. The strange man suddenly picked up the phone and put it to his ear, pretended to answer the phone, and wanted to turn away, but the girlfriend saw that his phone screen displayed a screen-protected message. status, so more suspicious.
In order to clarify the facts, the girlfriend stepped forward to ask the strange man if he had taken pictures secretly. If so, please delete the photo. The man replied: “Crazy line, click on my phone to check my phone than you!”, and then accelerated forward, walking faster and faster, his girlfriend tried to stop him from leaving, but he pushed away his girlfriend and tried to escape .
At that time, I was afraid that the puppy would rush into the road, so I didn’t go forward immediately. It was not until that moment that I realized that something was wrong, so I yelled at my girlfriend to come back to watch the puppy, and told her to call the police. Stopped the man, asked him if he had taken pictures secretly, and told him not to run away and wait for the police to deal with it, but he ignored it and turned around and ran away. When I hit him, I immediately responded: “I won’t hurt you, let alone hit you, I just want to prevent you from running away and destroy the evidence.” During the process, passers-by and two journalist friends took the video.
The police quickly arrived at the scene and separated us. After a round of questioning, the police found and confirmed that the strange man did indeed have eight pictures of his girlfriend on the phone (there was no picture of the dog, because the dog was sitting on the ground at the time, and we were sitting there. The location is the raised floor of the restaurant, and that angle cannot photograph the dog at all).
The police told us that if the private parts or important parts of other people were not photographed according to the law, they could not prosecute, they could only ask him to delete the photos, and warned the man that his girlfriend could only agree reluctantly. The ID card was recorded. The police did not record my ID card at that time, and it also proved that I did not commit any crimes such as assault or beating.
I solemnly declare
1) I have no intention of hitting anyone/hitting anyone. I am convinced that the CCTV on the street, the CCTV in the restaurant, the videos of the police, the crowd, and the videos of the two reporters can record the situation I described at the time, especially Two journalist friends also told me at the time that if men wanted to slander me, they would use the video to testify against me.
2) I had warned the strange man not to leave. We called the police, but he chose to run away. I did have a tangle with him and finally pinned him to the ground. At that time, this act was made out of urgency and in order to prevent him from destroying the evidence. There may be some inappropriate handling. I hereby apologize.
3) The police also confirmed that he had eight photos of his girlfriend and other girls on the phone. Since the law could not convict him, the police questioned his girlfriend and listed it as a dispute, which was later settled. I also heard that the police had The strange man was warned before he was released.
This fact has caused a lot of trouble to me and my girlfriend. After careful consideration, I decided to use this statement to state all the facts.
Finally, I believe that the public’s eyes are sharp, and I deeply regret that the online reports do not match the facts.