Home » Volodymyr Zelensky
Tag:

Volodymyr Zelensky

News

Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelenskyy Welcomes US Support Following Retaliatory Cyberattacks

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Ukraine Gears Up for Major Government Shake-Up: Svyrydenko Tapped for Premier, Umerov to Washington

Table of Contents

Kyiv, Ukraine – Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is reportedly planning a notable reshuffling of his government, with key appointments signaling a strategic shift in both domestic and international affairs.The anticipated changes see current Vice-Premier Yuliia Svyrydenko slated to take the helm as the nation’s new premier, and the current Minister of Defense, Rustem Umerov, eyed for the crucial diplomatic post of ambassador to Washington.

The selection of the 39-year-old Svyrydenko, who currently leads the Ministry of Economy, is understood to be influenced by a combination of her close ties to Andriy Yermak, Zelensky’s powerful chief of staff, and her established connections within the Trump administration’s circle.Her role in triumphant negotiations with Treasury Secretary Scott Beesent, which secured highly favorable mineral agreements for the United States, is believed to have bolstered her credentials.Svyrydenko is expected to be tasked with the critical mission of “transforming executive power.” This mandate includes translating President Zelensky’s calls for “changes” into tangible actions, addressing the pressing needs of the defense sector with a focus on “increasing national production of weapons,” and streamlining the state apparatus to “substantially reduce non-essential expenses.” These objectives were underscored by Zelensky following a meeting with the incumbent premier,Denys Shmyhal,who is rumored to be shifting to the Ministry of defense in the new configuration.

Meanwhile, Rustem Umerov faces what may be an even more delicate assignment as Ukraine’s ambassador to the United States. In this role, he will be responsible for navigating the complex and increasingly unpredictable relationship with a key ally, particularly in light of shifts in the White House.

The current representative in Washington, Oksana Markarova, who was notably captured in a moment of distress during a Trump outburst and subsequent meeting with Zelensky in the Oval Office last February, is reportedly paying a political price for her actions. Markarova is said to have alienated the Republican party by organizing a visit for Zelensky with Democratic representatives to a weapons depot in Pennsylvania during the 2024 campaign. This initiative drew condemnation from Speaker Mike johnson, who subsequently called for her resignation.

Should Yuliia Svyrydenko secure parliamentary approval, she would become only the second woman to hold the position of premier in Ukraine’s history, following in the footsteps of the prominent “maidan” figure, Yulia Tymoshenko. President Zelensky, having postponed presidential and parliamentary elections due to the ongoing conflict, is reportedly viewing this government reshuffle as a vital mechanism to inject renewed vigor into the nation’s governance. however, whispers of growing discontent and concerns about increasingly authoritarian and centralized methods are circulating within the opposition ranks.

This potential overhaul signifies a pivotal moment for Ukraine as it seeks to strengthen its defense capabilities, bolster its economy, and navigate evolving international alliances during a period of profound national challenge.

How does the US assistance package directly support Ukraine’s ability to defend against future cyberattacks?

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy Welcomes US Support Following Retaliatory Cyberattacks

Immediate Response to Escalating Cyber Warfare

following a wave of refined retaliatory cyberattacks targeting critical infrastructure in Ukraine, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has publicly expressed gratitude for the swift and robust support offered by the United States. The attacks, attributed to sources linked to the Russian government according to Ukrainian intelligence, caused temporary disruptions to energy grids, communication networks, and government services. this incident marks a notable escalation in the ongoing cyber warfare dimension of the conflict.

Details of the Cyberattacks & Ukrainian Response

The attacks, which began late on July 14th, 2025, utilized a combination of malware strains, including variants of Industroyer and BlackEnergy, previously linked to Russian state-sponsored actors.

Targeted Sectors: Primarily focused on Ukraine’s energy sector, aiming to destabilize power supply during the peak of summer demand. Telecommunications and financial institutions were also affected.

Disruption Levels: While significant, disruptions were largely contained within 24 hours thanks to proactive cybersecurity measures implemented by Ukrainian authorities and assistance from international partners.

Ukrainian Countermeasures: Ukraine’s State Service of special Communications and Information Protection (SSSCIP) immediately activated its national cyber incident response plan, collaborating with private sector cybersecurity firms to mitigate the damage and restore services.

US Assistance Package: A Breakdown

The US response has been multi-faceted, encompassing both immediate technical assistance and a commitment to long-term cybersecurity support.Key elements of the aid package include:

  1. Cybersecurity Expertise: Deployment of a team of cybersecurity specialists from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) to assist with incident response and forensic analysis.
  2. Threat Intelligence sharing: Enhanced sharing of real-time threat intelligence regarding Russian cyber capabilities and tactics. this includes identifying vulnerabilities and developing defensive strategies.
  3. Financial Aid: A $50 million grant allocated for bolstering ukraine’s cybersecurity infrastructure, including the acquisition of advanced threat detection and prevention systems.
  4. Joint Exercises: planned joint cybersecurity exercises to improve the readiness of Ukrainian and US forces to respond to future attacks. This builds on existing Ukraine-US security cooperation.

Zelenskyy’s Statement & International Implications

President Zelenskyy, in a televised address, stated, “We are deeply grateful for the unwavering support of the united States in the face of this blatant act of aggression. This cyberattack is a clear attempt to destabilize Ukraine and undermine our sovereignty. The US assistance is crucial in helping us defend our critical infrastructure and protect our citizens.”

The incident has drawn condemnation from international allies, including the European Union and NATO, who have pledged to increase their own cybersecurity assistance to Ukraine. This highlights the growing recognition of cybersecurity as a critical component of national security in the 21st century.

The Broader Context: Russia’s Cyber warfare Strategy

This latest attack fits into a broader pattern of Russian cyber activity targeting Ukraine, dating back to the initial stages of the conflict. Experts believe Russia views cyberattacks as a cost-effective way to exert pressure on Ukraine, disrupt its economy, and sow discord among its population.

Historical Precedents: The 2015 and 2016 attacks on Ukraine’s power grid serve as stark reminders of the potential for cyberattacks to cause widespread disruption.

Hybrid Warfare Tactics: russia’s use of cyberattacks is often integrated with other forms of hybrid warfare, including disinformation campaigns and economic pressure.

Escalation Risks: The increasing sophistication and frequency of these attacks raise concerns about the potential for escalation, possibly leading to a wider cyber conflict.

Protecting critical Infrastructure: Best Practices

The Ukrainian situation underscores the importance of robust cybersecurity measures for all nations.Key best practices include:

Regular Vulnerability Assessments: Conducting regular assessments to identify and address vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure systems.

Multi-factor Authentication: Implementing multi-factor authentication for all critical accounts.

Incident Response Planning: Developing and regularly testing incident response plans to ensure a swift and effective response to cyberattacks.

Employee Training: Providing cybersecurity awareness training to all employees.

* Information Sharing: Participating in information sharing initiatives to stay informed about the latest threats.

The Role of Private Sector Cybersecurity Firms

Private sector cybersecurity companies are playing an increasingly important role in defending against cyberattacks.Firms like CrowdStrike,FireEye (now Mandiant),and Kaspersky (despite geopolitical concerns) provide threat intelligence,incident response services,and security solutions to governments and businesses around the world. Their expertise is invaluable in combating the evolving threat landscape. the collaboration between Ukrainian authorities and these firms was instrumental in mitigating the impact of the recent attacks. this highlights the importance of public-private partnerships in cybersecurity.

Future Outlook & Ongoing Threats

The threat of further cyberattacks against Ukraine remains high.Experts predict that Russia will continue to refine its cyber capabilities and tactics, seeking to exploit vulnerabilities in Ukrainian systems. The US and its allies are

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail
world

Ukraine-Russia Spy War Escalates: New Blows Exchanged

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

The Escalating Shadow War: How Ukraine and Russia Are Redefining Modern Espionage

The stakes in Ukraine aren’t just measured in territorial gains and losses; they’re being fiercely contested in the shadows. A recent surge in espionage, sabotage, and alleged assassination attempts – highlighted by the killing of two Russian agents in Kyiv during an operation led by SBU chief Vasyl Malyuk – signals a dramatic escalation of a covert war that’s rapidly blurring the lines between traditional conflict and intelligence operations. But this isn’t simply a return to Cold War tactics. The speed, scope, and reliance on unconventional methods suggest a fundamental shift in how nations wage intelligence battles in the 21st century.

From Crimea to Cyberattacks: The Broadening Battlefield

For months, Ukraine and Russia have traded accusations of cross-border operations, with both sides claiming to have disrupted enemy plots and apprehended agents. The initial escalation, triggered by Ukraine’s “Operation Spiderweb” – a campaign utilizing drones and sabotage within Russia – prompted a retaliatory wave of arrests by Russia’s FSB. These aren’t limited to seasoned intelligence officers; a striking trend is the increasing recruitment of civilians, often through social media platforms like Telegram and WhatsApp. This democratization of espionage, leveraging readily available technology and exploiting vulnerabilities in online networks, represents a significant departure from traditional intelligence gathering.

The targets are equally diverse. Beyond the high-profile assassination of an SBU colonel, reported plots have focused on critical infrastructure – energy facilities, air bases, and even attempts to sabotage military logistics. The alleged involvement of a Ukrainian parliament member accused of spreading disinformation underscores the importance of information warfare in this conflict. Russia’s claims of thwarting attacks on civilian targets within its own borders, while potentially propagandistic, highlight the expanding scope of the conflict and the willingness of both sides to operate outside conventional boundaries.

The Rise of Improvised Explosives and the “Citizen Spy”

A particularly alarming trend is the proliferation of improvised explosive devices (IEDs). From the IED detonated in Dnipro to the foiled bombing attempts in Rivne and Berdyansk, these low-tech weapons are proving to be a favored tool for both sides. This reliance on IEDs suggests a need for rapid, deniable operations, and a willingness to accept collateral damage. Furthermore, the recruitment of individuals with limited training – a Ukrainian deserter turned FSB agent, a teenager reporting troop movements – points to a growing reliance on what could be termed the “citizen spy.” This poses a significant challenge to traditional counterintelligence efforts, which are geared towards identifying and tracking professional intelligence operatives.

The case of the Kharkiv woman allegedly luring soldiers to a rigged scooter giveaway exemplifies this dangerous trend. Exploiting trust and utilizing seemingly innocuous scenarios to deliver lethal payloads demonstrates a chilling level of ingenuity and a disregard for civilian safety. This tactic, mirrored by Russia’s alleged use of fake dating apps to target Ukrainian soldiers, highlights the insidious nature of this new form of warfare.

Beyond Russia: Expanding Intelligence Networks

Ukraine’s counterintelligence efforts aren’t solely focused on Russia. The recent detention of alleged Chinese spies attempting to gather information about Ukraine’s Neptune missile program reveals a broader geopolitical dimension to this intelligence war. This suggests that Ukraine is perceived as a valuable source of intelligence by multiple actors, and that the conflict is attracting the attention of nations beyond the immediate belligerents. This development underscores the importance of securing sensitive technologies and protecting intellectual property in a volatile geopolitical landscape.

The Future of Espionage: AI, Deepfakes, and the Erosion of Trust

The current escalation is likely just the beginning. As technology continues to advance, we can expect to see even more sophisticated and unconventional intelligence tactics emerge. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) will undoubtedly play a crucial role, enabling more effective data analysis, automated surveillance, and the creation of highly realistic deepfakes for disinformation campaigns. The use of AI-powered tools to identify and exploit vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure will also become increasingly prevalent.

This will lead to a further erosion of trust in information sources, making it increasingly difficult to distinguish between reality and fabrication. The ability to manipulate public opinion through targeted disinformation campaigns will become a powerful weapon, potentially destabilizing governments and undermining democratic processes. The challenge for nations will be to develop robust defenses against these threats, while also upholding civil liberties and protecting freedom of expression. RAND Corporation research highlights the growing sophistication of disinformation tactics and their potential impact on national security.

What are your predictions for the future of intelligence gathering in a world increasingly shaped by technology and geopolitical instability? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail
world

Trump’s Ukraine Weapon Cuts: Russia’s Gain? War Update

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

The Ukraine War’s Impact: How Weapon Shortages and Shifting Alliances Will Reshape Global Security

Could a sudden tightening of military aid to Ukraine signal a pivotal shift in the global landscape? While the world watches the ongoing conflict, recent decisions by the U.S. government to reassess its arms supply to Ukraine—specifically concerning the availability of vital ammunition like artillery, air defense missiles and precision munitions—point to a brewing storm of challenges and opportunities. This pause, combined with growing European involvement, might very well reshape the very future of international relations and warfare, forcing us to ask: Are we witnessing the beginning of a new era for **global security**?

The Pentagon’s Concerns: A Depleted Arsenal and New Strategic Realities

The Pentagon’s review, authorized by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, has unearthed concerning data about dwindling resources. The flow of arms to Ukraine, a lifeline for its defense, is placing a significant strain on existing stockpiles. This is not simply a matter of immediate supply, but also a longer-term challenge of maintaining adequate defense capabilities for the United States and its allies.

According to a recent report by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Europe has, for the first time, surpassed the U.S. in total military aid to Ukraine. This highlights both the urgency of the situation and the changing dynamics of international partnerships. Understanding these shifts is crucial for assessing the future of the conflict and the global balance of power. This reality forces the question of sustainability: Can the current levels of support be maintained, and what happens if they cannot?

The Two Sources of US Military Aid

The United States’ supply of weaponry to Ukraine comes from two key streams. Firstly, there is the drawdown of existing reserves, which necessitate replenishment by the Department of Defense. Secondly, the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI) facilitates the purchase of arms from U.S. defense companies. Any disruption in either of these channels carries significant consequences.

The decision to reassess aid, as stated by the White House, prioritizes U.S. interests. However, this creates ripples across the geopolitical spectrum. The timing of such a decision, coupled with evolving strategic considerations, suggests a need to understand the motives and implications behind these actions.

The Trump Factor: Political Intrigue and Strategic Realignments

The potential return of former U.S. President Donald Trump to the political stage casts a long shadow. His known skepticism towards NATO and his less confrontational approach with Russia have created a perception of uncertainty among allies. The possibility of a shift in U.S. policy regarding Ukraine and its military aid has sparked both concern and, in some quarters, guarded optimism, especially in Moscow.

“The less weapons are supplied to Ukraine, the closer the end of the special military operation will be,” stated Kremlin spokesperson Dmitri Peskov. While the Kremlin celebrates this potential shift, analysts like Francesco Tucci suggest that it’s highly likely the US decision seeks to pressure Ukraine to adopt a softer position, potentially paving the way for a truce. The geopolitical game is indeed on, and alliances may quickly reshape based on the changing circumstances.

The European Response: Stepping Up or Running Out?

Europe’s role is poised to become increasingly pivotal. With the U.S. reevaluating its commitment, European nations face a crucial decision: Either they increase their support, drawing down their own weapon reserves, or they risk seeing Ukraine’s defenses crumble. The implications are significant, potentially straining European military stockpiles and impacting relationships between the U.S. and its European allies. As a reminder, aid to Ukraine has already placed considerable strain on European resources and the possibility that Europe will face a prolonged period of weapons production that is not easy to manage.

Furthermore, the evolution of the Ukraine conflict has brought to light the importance of long-term armament needs. Some European countries are already working toward increasing their defense manufacturing capacity, though this is a complicated and lengthy process. This trend highlights the need for a comprehensive approach to arming Ukraine.

Expert Insight: “The dynamics of the war in Ukraine have exposed vulnerabilities in global supply chains and the urgent need for countries to diversify their defense procurement strategies,” says Dr. Anya Sharma, a leading expert in international security. “Those who adapt rapidly will gain a significant strategic advantage.”

The Future of Warfare: Drones, Missiles, and the Changing Battlefield

The conflict in Ukraine is already a testing ground for new technologies, with drones and precision missiles playing a central role. The recent surge of drone attacks, reaching a new monthly record in June, coupled with the use of advanced missiles, demonstrates the evolution of modern warfare. As a result, any decision to alter military support for Ukraine would indirectly affect their response to advanced missile attacks.

The effectiveness of air defense systems, such as the U.S.-supplied Patriot systems, is also being put to the test. However, the intensity and complexity of the Russian attacks mean that Ukraine’s defenses are under constant pressure. This underscores the importance of sustained access to modern weaponry. This shift is, however, not limited to Ukraine: Understanding these developments is vital for anticipating and preparing for future conflicts.

The Rise of Drone Warfare

The war has shown the effectiveness of inexpensive drones, particularly when used in swarms. With Russia’s launching of 5,438 drones in June alone, the proliferation and impact of unmanned aerial systems is already a major concern. This highlights the need for enhanced air defense capabilities and innovative countermeasures. The future battlefield promises to be a complex and contested airspace, forcing rapid technological advancements.

The Impact on Global Supply Chains

The conflict has disrupted global supply chains for military equipment, creating shortages and driving up costs. Countries are now reassessing their dependence on single suppliers and seeking more diversified procurement strategies. Investing in domestic production and collaborating with allies becomes more essential to ensure access to critical equipment. This shifts the dynamics of global arms trade. See our guide to the future of defense tech for a deeper dive into these trends.

Actionable Insights and Future Trends

So, what does all this mean for the future? The potential for a slowdown in arms supplies to Ukraine could have severe short-term ramifications. It could weaken the Ukrainian forces’ offensive capabilities and potentially embolden Russia. In the medium term, it underscores the need for nations to build up their own military stockpiles, diversify supply chains, and accelerate the development of advanced weaponry.

The European reaction is crucial. If the United States continues to provide less support, Europe must find a way to assist Ukraine, which may require an overhaul of its existing infrastructure. The conflict has demonstrated the importance of robust, adaptable, and innovative militaries.

As a final note, it’s essential to analyze the trends affecting international affairs, with a focus on how decisions by major players like the United States can shift the global balance of power. The coming months will be crucial, and the ramifications of current policy decisions will be felt for many years to come.


Frequently Asked Questions

How is the U.S. decision on aid affecting Ukraine?

The decision potentially limits Ukraine’s ability to defend itself against ongoing Russian attacks, as well as to mount counteroffensives. These decisions could have significant implications for Ukraine’s future and for the global response to the war.

What are the implications for Europe?

Europe faces increasing pressure to fill the gap left by any reduction in U.S. aid. This could strain European military resources and intensify the push for greater European defense capabilities.

What long-term effects might we see?

In the long term, we could see a reshaping of global alliances, shifts in the arms trade, and an acceleration in the development of new military technologies. These changes will alter the dynamics of international conflicts and geopolitical strategy. Read our article on the future of NATO for more details.

How can countries adapt to these changes?

Countries can adapt by bolstering their own military readiness, investing in diversified supply chains, increasing defense spending, and fostering stronger alliances. International cooperation will be essential for ensuring collective security.

Key Takeaway: The war in Ukraine is a catalyst for significant change in global security. Nations must proactively respond to the shifting strategic environment to ensure their interests are protected.

The situation is in constant flux. To gain further insight, you can explore our article about the future of military aid. Stay tuned!

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail
world

Zelensky Accuses Russia of Soldier Body Swap

by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief
written by Alexandra Hartman Editor-in-Chief


Ukraine War: Key Opposition Figure Freed, Zelensky Accuses Russia of Deception

In a day of meaningful developments surrounding the ongoing Ukraine war, a key Belarusian opposition figure has been released from prison, while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has made serious accusations against Russia regarding deception and the supply of materials for weapon production.

Belarusian Opposition Leader Freed

Sergei Tikhanovski, the husband of exiled Belarusian opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanovskaïa, was released from prison today along with 13 other individuals. He had been imprisoned following the disputed 2020 elections that kept Alexander Lukashenko in power, a reign now spanning three decades.

Tikhanovski was a central figure in the mass protests that followed the 2020 election, demonstrations that were met with a violent crackdown by the Lukashenko regime, a staunch ally of Vladimir Putin.Svetlana Tikhanovskaïa celebrated her husband’s release with a video posted on X, thanking Donald Trump and European allies for their efforts.ursula von der Leyen, President of The European Commission, hailed the release as a “symbol of hope”.

Zelensky Accuses Russia of Deception and Western Aid

Volodymyr Zelensky has accused Russia of intentionally providing the bodies of Russian soldiers to Ukraine under the guise of a prisoner exchange agreement. Zelensky claims these exchanges, intended to return the remains of fallen soldiers, have been exploited by Moscow to potentially inflate Ukrainian casualty figures and mask their own losses.

According to Zelensky, among the bodies received were those of foreign mercenaries, including an Israeli citizen with identifying documents. The Ukrainian President suggests that Russia may be sending these bodies to minimize their reported casualties and falsely portray a higher death toll on the Ukrainian side.

Western Companies Supplying Russia?

Zelensky also stated that western companies are allegedly supplying Russia with machine tools used for weapon production. He specifically named companies from Taiwan, Germany, Czech Republic, South Korea, Japan and India.

Zelensky is urging the European Union, The United States, and partner nations to impose sanctions on these companies. “We have transmitted all this facts to everyone, our partners, the European Union and the United States. We strongly call on everyone to sanction these companies,” Zelensky stated.

Comparing Claims: Body Exchanges

The Allegations surrounding the body exchanges raise serious questions about the conduct of wartime negotiations and humanitarian efforts. The table below summarizes the contrasting claims:

Claim Details
Ukraine’s claim Russia is deliberately sending bodies of Russian soldiers and foreign fighters to inflate Ukrainian casualties.
Russia’s Claim (Implied) Russia has not responded directly to these accusations, but has previously agreed to exchanges.
Agreed exchange An agreement was made in Istanbul on June 2 for a massive exchange of soldiers’ remains.

Did you know? The Ukrainian Coordination Center for Prisoners of War reported receiving 6,057 bodies but is verifying the identities and nationalities.

Broader implications

These accusations come at a sensitive time, as international scrutiny of the Ukraine war intensifies. The alleged actions could further strain relations and complicate ongoing negotiations.

The accusations of western complicity in supplying Russia’s military industry also raise significant ethical and legal questions, potentially leading to increased pressure on these companies and their home countries.

The Deteriorating Belarus-Ukraine Relationship

While not directly mentioned in the core news, the release of Tikhanovski highlights the complex relationship between Belarus and Ukraine, especially in the context of the Ukraine war.According to Wikipedia, relations between the two countries have deteriorated sence 2020, notably after Ukraine criticized Lukashenko’s regime during the belarusian protests.

lukashenko’s close ties with Putin and Belarus’s geographical location have made it a key player and a potential staging ground in the conflict, further complicating regional dynamics.

Evergreen Insights: The Geopolitical Landscape

The events surrounding the Ukraine war and the internal politics of Belarus underscore several long-term geopolitical trends:

  • The increasing complexity of international alliances and rivalries.
  • The use of misinformation and disinformation as tools of warfare.
  • The fragility of democratic institutions in the face of authoritarian pressure.

These factors highlight the need for continued vigilance and robust international cooperation to address these challenges effectively.

Pro Tip: Always verify information from multiple sources, especially in conflict zones, to avoid being misled by propaganda.

Frequently Asked Questions About The Ukraine War and Related Events

  1. What sparked the recent tensions in the Ukraine war? The recent tensions were sparked by accusations from President Zelensky regarding body exchanges and the supply of machine tools to Russia.
  2. How does the release of Sergei Tikhanovski relate to the Ukraine war? While primarily a Belarusian issue, it reflects the broader geopolitical tensions in the region, given Belarus’s close relationship with Russia.
  3. What are the potential consequences of Western companies supplying Russia? The potential consequences include sanctions, reputational damage, and legal repercussions for violating international trade laws.
  4. What can international organizations do to address this situation? International organizations can investigate the claims, impose sanctions, and facilitate diplomatic solutions to de-escalate the conflict.
  5. how reliable is the information coming from both sides of the conflict? Information from both sides should be treated with caution and verified through independent sources due to the potential for propaganda and misinformation.
  6. what is the current state of Belarus-Ukraine relations? Relations are strained, particularly due to Belarus’s support for Russia in the Ukraine war and the suppression of democracy within Belarus.

what Are Your Thoughts?

What are your thoughts on these developments? Share your comments and reactions below.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestThreadsBlueskyEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.