Home » racism
Tag:

racism

News

Discrimination in Marseille: “This city which dreamed of being multicultural has become a multi-discriminatory city”

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

“Death to the Arabs”: Marseille Confronts Rising Racism, Activists Demand Change – Breaking News

Marseille, France is grappling with a surge in reported racist incidents, triggered by deeply disturbing graffiti discovered on the office door of a local deputy mayor. The phrase “Death to the Arabs” has ignited outrage and spurred the formation of a collective, “Stop Stigmatization,” dedicated to combating the normalization of hate speech and advocating for a more inclusive future. This breaking news comes at a particularly sensitive time, as France navigates complex debates surrounding identity and immigration. This isn’t just a local issue; it reflects a broader European trend, and understanding the roots of this tension is crucial. We’re following this story closely for archyde.com, providing updates as they unfold.

A demonstration on the Place du Vieux Port in Marseille. (SOPA Images/LightRocket via Gett – SOPA Images)

A City at a Crossroads: Marseille’s Multicultural Fabric

Marseille is renowned for its vibrant multiculturalism, a characteristic deeply woven into the city’s history and identity. Home to a significant North African population, the city boasts between 50,000 and 100,000 residents of Comorian descent and approximately 300,000 with Algerian roots. This rich tapestry of cultures, while a source of strength, also presents challenges. The recent incident underscores the fragility of social cohesion and the potential for prejudice to erupt, particularly during periods of political and economic uncertainty. The “Stop Stigmatization” collective isn’t simply reacting to this single act of vandalism; they’re addressing a perceived pattern of escalating intolerance.

“Stop Stigmatization”: A Manifesto for Change

The collective, comprised of around twenty associations, has launched a manifesto denouncing what they describe as a “nauseating climate” and the increasing acceptance of racist rhetoric. Their primary demand, articulated through a petition gaining traction online, is an end to the trivialization of racism. However, their vision extends beyond immediate condemnation. “Stop Stigmatization” aims to secure lasting improvements for future generations, advocating for educational reforms and policies that promote understanding and respect. This proactive approach is key; simply reacting to incidents isn’t enough. The collective understands that long-term change requires addressing the underlying causes of prejudice.

The Broader Context: Racism in France and Beyond

France, like many European nations, has been grappling with rising concerns about racism and discrimination. Recent years have seen a surge in reported hate crimes, fueled by factors such as economic anxieties, immigration debates, and the spread of extremist ideologies online. The French government has implemented various measures to combat racism, including stricter laws and increased funding for anti-discrimination initiatives. However, critics argue that these efforts are insufficient and that more systemic changes are needed. This incident in Marseille serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing challenges and the need for continued vigilance. For readers interested in learning more about France’s approach to combating racism, resources from the French government provide valuable insights.

SEO & Google News Optimization: Staying Informed

Archyde.com is committed to delivering breaking news with speed and accuracy. We utilize best practices in Google News SEO to ensure our reporting reaches the widest possible audience. This includes utilizing structured data markup and focusing on relevant keywords like “Marseille racism,” “France anti-racism,” and “hate speech.” We believe that informed citizens are empowered citizens, and we strive to provide the information you need to stay ahead of the curve.

The situation in Marseille remains fluid. “Stop Stigmatization” is planning further demonstrations and advocacy efforts, and archyde.com will continue to provide comprehensive coverage of this developing story. The fight against racism is a collective responsibility, and by amplifying the voices of those demanding change, we hope to contribute to a more just and equitable future. Stay tuned to archyde.com for the latest updates and in-depth analysis on this critical issue.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

accused of racist gesture, what does footballer Aron Dönnum risk?

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Toulouse FC’s Aron Dönnum Faces Potential 10-Match Ban Over Racism Accusation

[URGENT: This story is developing. Check back for updates.] Ligue 1 is reeling after accusations of racism leveled against Toulouse FC midfielder Aron Dönnum following a controversial gesture during Sunday’s match against Le Havre. The incident, which occurred in added time, has prompted an immediate investigation by the French Professional Football League (LFP) and could result in a significant suspension – potentially up to ten matches – for the Norwegian international.

What Happened on the Pitch?

The altercation began after a tackle by Le Havre’s Simon Ebonog on Dönnum. A brief exchange of words followed, before Dönnum made a hand gesture waving his hand in front of his face. Le Havre coach Didier Digard and the entire Le Havre team immediately accused Dönnum of racism. Dönnum vehemently denies the accusation, claiming he was reacting to Ebonog’s breath, stating, “I do it like this because it smells bad. It has nothing to do with racism.” However, his explanation has done little to quell the outrage.

Investigation Launched & Potential Sanctions

Despite the referee not directly witnessing the gesture, Frédéric Thiriez, president of the National Ethics Council (CNE), has referred the matter to the LFP Disciplinary Commission. Dönnum and Toulouse FC will be required to present their defense as early as next week. The LFP’s disciplinary regulations are clear: any act of discrimination based on any protected characteristic is subject to sanction. Article 2 specifically addresses actions “undermining their dignity and likely to harm their physical and/or psychological state.”

The stakes are incredibly high. A ten-match suspension, while not guaranteed, is a very real possibility. This isn’t just about a single game; it’s about the integrity of the league and sending a powerful message against racism in football. The speed with which the LFP is acting underscores the seriousness with which they are treating these allegations – a crucial step in maintaining a welcoming and inclusive environment for all players.

Precedent and the Weight of History

While high-profile racism cases in French football are relatively rare, precedents exist. In 2007, Lyon striker Milan Baros made a similar gesture towards Stéphane Mbia of Rennes. Though Baros claimed he simply wanted Mbia to move away, he was still suspended for three matches, with the LFP deeming the gesture “unspeakable and unacceptable.” More recently, in May 2024, Monaco’s Mohamed Camara received a four-match ban for concealing a rainbow armband promoting inclusivity. Internationally, Italian defender Marco Curto was handed a ten-match FIFA suspension earlier this year for a racially insensitive comparison of a South Korean player to Jackie Chan.

These cases highlight the evolving landscape of disciplinary action in football. What might have been overlooked or lightly punished in the past is now subject to much greater scrutiny. The increasing awareness of the harmful impact of racism and discrimination is driving a demand for stronger consequences.

The Broader Fight Against Racism in Football

This incident with Aron Dönnum isn’t isolated. It’s part of a larger, ongoing struggle to eradicate racism from football, a sport that prides itself on its global inclusivity. Organizations like FIFA, UEFA, and national leagues are implementing various initiatives, including educational programs, anti-discrimination campaigns, and stricter penalties for offenders. However, the fight is far from over.

The incident also raises important questions about the role of perception and intent. While Dönnum maintains his gesture was not racially motivated, the impact on Simon Ebonog and the wider community is undeniable. This case serves as a stark reminder that even unintentional actions can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and contribute to a hostile environment.

As the LFP Disciplinary Commission prepares to deliver its verdict, the football world watches with bated breath. This case will not only determine Aron Dönnum’s future but also send a powerful signal about the league’s commitment to combating racism and fostering a truly inclusive game. Stay tuned to Archyde for the latest updates on this developing story and for in-depth coverage of the ongoing fight for equality in sports.

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
News

Discrimination Complaints Emerge Over André Ventura’s Posters: ‘This is not Bangladesh

by James Carter Senior News Editor
written by James Carter Senior News Editor

Election Campaign Rhetoric Sparks Outrage in Portugal

Table of Contents


Lisbon, Portugal – Campaign posters released by Andre Ventura, a candidate in the upcoming 2026 election, have ignited a firestorm of controversy. The advertisements, now displayed in municipalities including Moita and Montijo, feature provocative statements that are drawing condemnation from community leaders and advocacy groups.

Among the phrases appearing on the posters are slogans such as “This is not Bangladesh” and “Gypsies must obey the law”. These statements have prompted immediate responses, with complaints filed by Romani and anti-racism organizations to both the Public Ministry and the National Elections Commission (CNE). Simultaneously, representatives of the Bangladeshi community have voiced strong indignation regarding the messaging.

Ventura himself acknowledged the deployment of the posters via a post on his social media account. The campaign’s approach appears to center on themes of national identity and adherence to legal standards, yet it is indeed facing accusations of discriminatory and xenophobic undertones.

The Controversy Unfolds

Critics argue that the language employed in the campaign materials serves to marginalize minority groups and stoke division within Portuguese society. The use of “This is not Bangladesh” specifically has been labeled as disrespectful and exclusionary towards the Bangladeshi diaspora, a community that contributes significantly to Portugal’s economy and cultural fabric. Recent data from portugal’s National Institute of statistics indicates a 30% increase in the Bangladeshi population over the last decade, highlighting the community’s growing presence.

The phrase targeting the Romani community – “Gypsies must obey the law” – is seen as reinforcing harmful stereotypes and implying a systemic disregard for the law within that population. This claim overlooks the diverse experiences and law-abiding nature of the vast majority of Romani citizens. According to a 2024 report by the European Roma rights Centre, discriminatory policing practices remain a important issue for Romani communities across europe, including Portugal.

Key details at a Glance

issue Details
Candidate Andre Ventura
Election Year 2026
controversial Phrases “This is not Bangladesh”, “Gypsies must obey the law”
locations of Posters Moita, Montijo

Did You Know? Portugal has a growing number of immigrants from Bangladesh, a significant portion of whom work in the agricultural sector.

Pro Tip: When evaluating political rhetoric, consider the potential impact on different communities and the broader social cohesion of the country.

The unfolding situation raises significant questions about the boundaries of acceptable discourse in political campaigning and the responsibility of candidates to avoid perpetuating prejudice. As the election cycle progresses, it remains to be seen how these issues will influence voter sentiment and the overall political climate.

Understanding Political Rhetoric and its Impact

The use of emotionally charged language and appeals to national identity are common tactics in political campaigns worldwide. However, when such rhetoric crosses the line into discrimination or xenophobia, it can have damaging consequences for social harmony and democratic values. The case of andre Ventura’s campaign serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of responsible political dialog.

Historically, similar instances of divisive rhetoric have been observed in other European nations, often leading to increased social tensions and even violence. A 2023 study by the Pew Research Center found that attitudes towards immigrants remain divided across Europe, with concerns about economic impact and cultural integration frequently expressed.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Portuguese Election Controversy

  • What is the core issue in this controversy? The core issue revolves around the use of possibly discriminatory and xenophobic language in Andre Ventura’s campaign posters for the 2026 election.
  • Which communities have voiced concerns? Both the Bangladeshi community and Romani (Gypsy) organizations, alongside anti-racism associations, have expressed concerns.
  • What action has been taken in response? Complaints have been filed with the Public Ministry and the National Elections Commission (CNE).
  • Where have the posters been located? The posters have been reported in the municipalities of Moita and Montijo.
  • What is Andre Ventura’s response? Ventura acknowledged the posters’ deployment through a social media post.
  • Is this type of campaign rhetoric common in Portugal? While not universally common, instances of nationalistic and identity-focused rhetoric have been observed in Portuguese politics.
  • What are the potential consequences of this controversy for the election? The controversy could influence voter sentiment and potentially impact Ventura’s electoral prospects.

What are your thoughts on the role of responsible rhetoric in political campaigns? Do you believe candidates have a duty to avoid divisive language, even if it appeals to a segment of their base?

Share your opinions in the comments below!



How might the legal outcome of these complaints influence future political campaigning strategies in Portugal regarding immigration and national identity?

Discrimination Complaints Emerge Over André Ventura’s Posters: ‘This is not Bangladesh’

The Controversy Unfolds: Examining the Campaign Imagery

Portuguese politician André Ventura, leader of the Chega party, has ignited a firestorm of controversy with his recent election posters bearing the slogan “This is not Bangladesh.” The campaign imagery, depicting a predominantly white Portuguese family, has sparked widespread accusations of racism, xenophobia, and discrimination. Complaints have been filed with Portuguese authorities, alleging violations of anti-discrimination laws. This article delves into the details of the complaints,the legal framework surrounding them,and the broader context of immigration and identity in Portugal.

Understanding the Discrimination complaints

Several organizations and individuals have formally lodged complaints against Ventura and the Chega party. Key arguments presented in these complaints include:

* Racial Discrimination: Critics argue the posters implicitly suggest that Portuguese identity is inherently tied to ethnicity, excluding individuals of Bangladeshi origin and other minority groups. This is seen as a clear act of racial discrimination.

* Xenophobia & Anti-Immigrant Sentiment: The slogan is interpreted as a deliberate attempt to stoke fear and resentment towards immigrants, particularly those from Bangladesh. This fuels xenophobic narratives and contributes to a opposed surroundings.

* Violation of Equality Principles: Portuguese law guarantees equal treatment irrespective of origin or ethnicity. The posters are alleged to violate these basic principles by creating a divisive and exclusionary message.

* Incitement to hatred: Some complaints claim the imagery and slogan could incite hatred or violence against immigrant communities.

The complaints are currently under review by the Public Prosecutor’s Office (Ministério Público) and the Commission for Citizenship and Equality (CITE). Potential consequences for Ventura and Chega could range from fines to legal restrictions on campaigning.

Legal Framework: Anti-Discrimination Laws in Portugal

Portugal has a robust legal framework designed to combat discrimination. Key legislation includes:

* The Portuguese Constitution: Guarantees equality before the law and prohibits discrimination based on various grounds, including race, origin, and nationality.

* Law 37/2007 (Framework Law on Discrimination): this law defines discrimination, establishes mechanisms for prevention and redress, and outlines penalties for discriminatory practices.

* Law 71/2009 (Law against Racial Discrimination): Specifically addresses racial discrimination, criminalizing acts motivated by racial hatred or prejudice.

* Law 147/2015 (Law on Equality and Non-Discrimination): Reinforces the principles of equality and non-discrimination in all areas of life.

these laws provide a strong legal basis for challenging discriminatory practices, including those manifested in political campaigns. The CITE plays a crucial role in investigating complaints and promoting equality.

The Context: Immigration and Identity in Portugal

Portugal has experienced a significant increase in immigration over the past two decades. while historically an emigration country, it has become a destination for migrants from various parts of the world, including Bangladesh, Brazil, Ukraine, and African nations.

* Bangladeshi Community in Portugal: The Bangladeshi community is one of the largest immigrant groups in Portugal, contributing substantially to the economy, particularly in sectors like agriculture and textiles.

* Rise of Right-wing Populism: The controversy surrounding Ventura’s posters reflects a broader trend of rising right-wing populism in Europe, often fueled by anti-immigrant sentiment and nationalist rhetoric.

* Debate on National Identity: The campaign has reignited a debate about Portuguese national identity and what it means to be Portuguese in a multicultural society. Ventura’s rhetoric taps into anxieties about cultural change and perceived threats to traditional values.

* Integration Challenges: While Portugal has generally been welcoming to immigrants,challenges remain in terms of integration,access to services,and combating discrimination.

Reactions and Responses to the Campaign

The posters have drawn condemnation from across the political spectrum, and also from civil society organizations and international bodies.

* Political Opposition: Opposition parties have strongly criticized Ventura’s campaign, accusing him of promoting racism and division.

* Civil Society Outcry: Anti-racism groups and immigrant advocacy organizations have organized protests and launched online campaigns to denounce the posters.

* International Condemnation: Several international organizations have expressed concern about the campaign’s potential to fuel xenophobia and discrimination.

* Chega’s Defense: ventura and the Chega party have defended the posters, arguing they are simply highlighting the importance of preserving Portuguese culture and identity. they claim the slogan is not intended to be discriminatory but rather to emphasize the distinctiveness of Portugal.

Potential Outcomes and Future Implications

The outcome of the complaints filed against Ventura and Chega remains uncertain. However,the controversy has already had a significant impact on the political landscape.

* Increased Scrutiny of Chega: The campaign has brought increased scrutiny to the Chega party and its policies.

* Heightened Awareness of Discrimination: The controversy has raised awareness about the issue of discrimination in Portugal and the importance of combating racism and xenophobia.

* Potential for Legal Precedent: The outcome of the legal proceedings could set a precedent for future

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Technology

Unveiling the 2023 Florida Shooting: Key Insights and Takeaways from Netflix’s Documentary

by
written by

Ocala, Florida – Susan Lorincz, 61, was sentenced to 25 years in prison on Monday, November 25, 2024, for the manslaughter of her neighbor, Ajike “AJ” Shantrell Owens, in June 2023. The case, which has ignited debate surrounding Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law, was recently the subject of a netflix documentary titled “The Perfect Neighbor”.

The sentencing, delivered by Judge Robert Hodges at the Marion County Judicial Centre, follows a jury’s guilty verdict in August. lorincz fatally shot Owens through a locked door, with her son present, amidst a long-running neighborhood dispute. the case quickly drew widespread attention due to its racial undertones and the complexities of self-defense laws.

A History of Conflict

Table of Contents

According to law enforcement accounts and witness testimony documented in the Netflix film, the animosity between Lorincz and Owens was ongoing for years. Marion County Sheriff Billy Woods stated that deputies had responded to over ten incidents related to the neighborhood feud since January 2021. These incidents included accusations of trespassing and verbal altercations.

Prior to the shooting, encounters involved Lorincz alleging that Owens threw a sign at her, causing a minor injury. Witnesses described Lorincz as frequently causing issues with neighbors and “messing with everyone’s kids.” The documentary presents footage from 911 calls and bodycam recordings offering insight into the escalating conflict.

The Day of the Shooting

On June 2, 2023, the tension reached a tragic climax.Reports indicate that an argument began when Owens’ children were playing near Lorincz’s property, and Lorincz allegedly used racial slurs and threw an object at them. When Owens sought to address the situation with Lorincz, she was fatally shot through the closed door of Lorincz’s residence. The incident raised immediate questions about the application of Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law.

According to Sheriff Woods, the initial inability to make an arrest was due to the stipulations of the law, which require proof that self-defense was not justified. This aspect of the case sparked considerable controversy and fueled public demand for accountability.

Florida’s ‘Stand Your Ground’ Law Explained

Florida’s “Stand Your Ground” law, enacted in 2005, removes the duty to retreat before using deadly force in self-defense. This differs from many other states which require individuals to attempt to avoid confrontation before resorting to violence. The law has been a source of ongoing debate,with critics arguing it contributes to an escalation of violence.Did You Know? A 2022 study by the Urban Institute found that states with “Stand your Ground” laws saw a meaningful increase in gun homicides.

Feature Traditional Self-Defense Laws Florida “Stand Your ground” Law
Duty to Retreat Generally Required not Required
Legal Justification Reasonable fear of imminent death or great bodily harm Reasonable fear of imminent death or great bodily harm
Place of Application Applies primarily outside the home Applies anywhere a person has a legal right to be

The Netflix documentary highlighted the implications of the law for Black Americans. Activists, like Terry Coney, president of the NAACP Lakeland Branch, have argued the law can disproportionately affect minority communities.

The Aftermath and Sentencing

Lorincz was initially charged with manslaughter with a firearm, as well as related assault charges. The defense argued self-defense, claiming Owens threatened her. However, prosecutors successfully argued that Lorincz’s actions were not justified under the circumstances. After a lengthy trial, the jury found her guilty of manslaughter.

Lorincz is currently incarcerated at the Homestead Correctional Institution in Miami-Dade County, with a projected release date of April 8, 2048. The case continues to generate discussion about racial justice, self-defense laws, and the escalating tensions that can arise in neighborhood disputes. What role, if any, do implicit biases play in cases like this?

Understanding Manslaughter Charges

Manslaughter, unlike murder, generally involves a lack of malice aforethought. There are typically two types: voluntary manslaughter, which occurs in the heat of passion, and involuntary manslaughter, resulting from criminal negligence. The penalties for manslaughter vary significantly by jurisdiction. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, manslaughter accounted for approximately 6% of all homicides in the United States in 2022.

Frequently Asked Questions About The Case

  • What is the ‘Stand Your Ground’ law? It’s a Florida law removing the duty to retreat before using deadly force in self-defense.
  • What was Susan Lorincz charged with? She was convicted of manslaughter with a firearm.
  • Where is Susan Lorincz now? She is serving a 25-year sentence at Homestead Correctional Institution.
  • What sparked the conflict between Owens and Lorincz? A long-running neighborhood dispute involving accusations of trespassing and verbal altercations.
  • What role did Netflix play in bringing attention to this case? netflix released a documentary, “The Perfect neighbor,” which garnered significant viewership and reignited public discussion about the case.
  • How did the community react to the verdict? The sentencing brought a mix of relief and continued calls for racial justice and reform.
  • What is the current status of Ajike Owens’ children? According to reports, Owens’ children are now living with their grandmother.

Do you think the “Stand Your Ground” law needs to be reformed? Share your thoughts in the comments below.

How did the media coverage of the Parkland shooting contribute to the rise of the #NeverAgain movement?

Unveiling the 2018 Parkland Shooting: Key Insights and Takeaways from Netflix’s Documentary

The Timeline of Events: A Detailed Reconstruction

The Netflix documentary, focusing on the tragic 2018 shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, meticulously reconstructs the events leading up to, during, and after the horrific incident. Understanding the chronology is crucial for grasping the full scope of the tragedy and the systemic failures that contributed to it.

* February 14, 2018, 2:21 PM: The first shots are fired at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School. Nikolas Cruz, a former student, opens fire on students and staff.

* Initial Response: The initial response from school security and law enforcement is heavily scrutinized in the documentary, highlighting delays and communication breakdowns.

* Duration of the Shooting: The shooting lasted approximately six minutes,during which 17 people were killed and 17 others were injured.

* Cruz’s Capture: Nikolas Cruz was apprehended approximately one mile from the school roughly an hour after the shooting began.

Nikolas Cruz: A Profile of the Shooter

The documentary delves into the background of Nikolas Cruz, examining factors that may have contributed to his violent actions. This includes his troubled childhood, mental health issues, and access to firearms.

* Early Life & Trauma: Cruz experienced critically important trauma early in life, including the death of his adoptive mother.

* Mental Health Concerns: Reports and documented evidence reveal a history of mental health concerns,including depression and emotional instability. The documentary explores the adequacy of mental health services available to Cruz.

* Warning Signs: Numerous warning signs were missed or dismissed prior to the shooting, including concerning social media posts and reports from classmates and school staff. This raises questions about threat assessment protocols and the duty of reporting potential dangers.

* Firearm Access: Cruz legally purchased the AR-15 style rifle used in the shooting, despite his history of concerning behavior. This highlights the debate surrounding gun control and background checks.

Systemic Failures: Where Did Things Go wrong?

A central theme of the documentary is the identification of systemic failures that allowed the shooting to occur. these failures span multiple levels, from law enforcement and school administration to mental health services and gun control legislation.

* Law Enforcement Response: The documentary critically examines the response of the Broward County sheriff’s Office,specifically focusing on the actions (and inactions) of Deputy Scot Peterson,the school resource officer.

* FBI Tip Line Failure: The FBI received multiple tips about Cruz’s potential for violence but failed to adequately investigate them. This failure is a significant point of contention and led to internal investigations.

* School Security Protocols: The documentary questions the effectiveness of the school’s security protocols, including the lack of controlled access points and the delayed implementation of lockdown procedures.

* Mental Healthcare Access: Limited access to affordable and effective mental healthcare is identified as a contributing factor. The documentary explores the challenges faced by individuals seeking mental health treatment.

The Rise of Gun Violence Activism: #NeverAgain

The Parkland shooting sparked a powerful wave of student-led activism,spearheaded by survivors who formed the #NeverAgain movement. The documentary chronicles the rise of this movement and its impact on the national conversation about gun violence.

* March for Our Lives: The March for our Lives rally, organized by Parkland students, drew hundreds of thousands of participants across the country and became a defining moment in the gun control debate.

* Political Advocacy: Students actively lobbied lawmakers, organized voter registration drives, and campaigned for stricter gun control legislation.

* Media Influence: The students’ powerful stories and unwavering advocacy garnered significant media attention, amplifying their message and raising awareness about gun violence.

* Impact on Midterm Elections: the #neveragain movement is credited with mobilizing young voters and influencing the outcome of the 2018 midterm elections.

Legal Proceedings & Aftermath

The documentary also provides updates on the legal proceedings against Nikolas cruz, including his trial and sentencing.

* Cruz’s Trial: The trial focused on determining Cruz’s guilt and, subsequently, his sentence.

* Sentencing: In November 2022, Cruz was sentenced to life in prison without parole, avoiding the death penalty.

* Civil Lawsuits: families of the victims have filed civil lawsuits against various entities, including the Broward County School Board and the manufacturer of the AR-15 rifle.

* Ongoing Trauma: The documentary highlights the lasting trauma experienced by survivors, families, and the Parkland community as a whole.

Resources for Support & Advocacy

* Everytown for Gun Safety: https://everytownresearch.org/

* **G

0 comments
0 FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
Newer Posts
Older Posts
@2025 - All Right Reserved.

Hosted by ByoHosting - Most Recommendeed Webhhosting. For complains, abuse, advertising contact:
[email protected]

Adblock Detected

Please support us by disabling your AdBlocker extension from your browsers for our website.